Sentences with phrase «everything you claim on»

To summarize, I stand by everything I claimed on the poster.

Everything you claim on your resume (or social media profiles) is fair game for the interviewer

5 Know everything you claim on your resume and social media profiles cold.

Not exact matches

In August, Moore made a similar argument on mass shootings in the US, claiming America «asked for it,» because it has «taken God out of everything.»

Online reputation management companies abound on the Internet — claiming everything from 100 percent success rate (or your money back) to a «special technology» that reorders search results.

The online giant's move to slash prices on everything from organic baby kale to fair - trade bananas on the same day its $ 13.7 billion acquisition of Whole Foods Market Inc. closes showed the «high - velocity decision making» Amazon founder Jeff Bezos claims as his hallmark, and sent shares of Kroger Co., Costco Wholesale Corp. and Wal - Mart Stores Inc. reeling Thursday.

encrypts everything and claims not to store user data on its servers.

Its all nice and fun to pretend that perhaps a meteor strike caused life to begin but you still fail to tell me who created that meteor, who created everything that was needed for life to exist... really... that had to of been a start to it all somewhere and I would love to see an atheist stumble on explaining only «what they claim to know» while refusing to believe what they don't know and can't see.

But I trust that our countrymen will not be softened to that kind of crimes and criminals; for if we should, our hearts will be hardened to everything which has a claim on our benevolence.

We hurt their feelings and probably interfere with their sleep patterns by calling them out on everything from poor spelling to having a faith grounded in no evidence (at least in its core claims).

Afterall does nt the bible claim that everything else on this planet is for your enjoyment!

Our Jim has always claimed to be a FEDERALIST 49 constitutionalist, which means he believes that the Constitution needs «the veneration which time bestows on everything» to be sustainable.

If you want to claim God as the reason for everything, you then must back your claim with evidence for your god or you deserve to be called on it.

One can live on little food, but not on none; one can defy his environment, but never wholly escape social claims; one can get more education, but can never know everything; one can live to a ripe old age, but eventually the grim reaper comes his way.

They also become rivals when religion claims it's denomination to be the highest form of wisdom to the denial of everything else simply based on dogma.

They frittered away our Social Security money on everything but social security, then claimed the system was broken.

Can we reconceive theological education in such a way that (1) it clearly pertains to the totality of human life, in the public sphere as well as the private, because it bears on all of our powers; (2) it is adequate to genuine pluralism, both of the «Christian thing» and of the worlds in which the «Christian thing» is lived, by avoiding naiveté about historical and cultural conditioning without lapsing into relativism; (3) it can be the unifying overarching goal of theological education without requiring the tacit assumption that there is a universal structure or essence to education in general, or theological inquiry in particular, which inescapably denies genuine pluralism by claiming to be the universal common denominator to which everything may be reduced as variations on a theme; and (4) it can retrieve the strengths of both the «Athens» and the «Berlin» types of excellent schooling, without unintentionally subordinating one to the other?

Even if you would know everything there is to know about Shinto, that does not give you the right to claim that god (or gods) is protecting a specific building from a tsunami, on the top of a hill, no less.

Thing is, that word is a combination of two words, and I was wondering on the meaning of αρσην and κοιτης I've found them, and some articles pertaining to the word itself, and everything I find supports your claim.

Hello Derp (my ignorant responder) Since you enjoy stereotyping so much and compare God to big foot, unicorns, aliens and horned beasts and since you claim to be superior in intelligence then explain how everything that pertains to life and creation and what has been and is happening now and what will be is clearly explained in the Bible in full detail while your beliefs are based on theory?

Religious and political institutions claim that everything they do is advancing the rule and reign of God on earth.

It is based on the total lack of evidence supporting religious claims and the universal fact that everything ever examined operates according to natural laws.

Once we are saved, we are new creatures and so then the effect of believing the gospel is an all encompassing claim on life What if nearly everything in life could be redeemed for discipleship?

People who claim the «Conservative» label rarely agree on everything, in many cases they differ radically, William F. Buckley, for example, supported legalization of marijuana and cocaine, which other people who think themselves conservatives call the height of liberalism.

OF course, two Christians can both claim to have the holy spirit and disagree on nearly everything in the bible and neither of them sees the problem.

... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself.

An honest person who openly disagrees with you on a few things is a better choice than a dishonest person who claims they believe everything you do, and secretly disagrees with you... or even disdains you for your gullibility.

CNN makes no claims that everything on their cnn.com domain name is news that everyone needs to know.

He does not pretend to know God's mind as some TV evangalists and Christian conservative leaders claim to do — blaming everything on gays and liberals.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the worlOn the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the worlon the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.

I can't prove God's existence just as much as scientist can't prove the big bang... there is evidence of both but to reach a conclusion takes faith... one side leaves hope and the other does not... maybe I'm agnostic too because I don't claim to know everything about why I'm here, I have to have faith... Honestly, I'm sick of the extremes on both sides... the conservative judgmental Christian, who never thought through things as to why the believe what they do (ie Dinosaurs, cavemen, evolution, etc.) and the intellectually arrogant atheist and humanists.

But with everyone having a «personal relationship» with «God» and interpreting everything they see on an individual basis anyway, any claim can be made.

Speaking of the Melbourne Conference, C.S.Song said that it would mobilize everything in its power to claim the world as its mission field, and in all likelihood, come up with a well balanced manifesto on the missionary task of the church.

Berrigan's complaint, in short, is that the reestablishment of a Jewish state (a justifiable goal) has come at a tremendous cost in human suffering, armed violence and moral decay; that the course of the new state has been a betrayal of everything the term «Israel» has stood for — justice, compassion, succoring the humiliated and injured; that a «settler state» was established through the expropriation of the people of the land, followed by an imperialist venture, based on the subjugation and exploitation of the conquered; and that, to add moral insult to physical and spiritual injury, the spokesmen of and for the state claim for it a special virtue and glorious achievement which may not be criticized.

If there was any other book claiming to be the authority on everything that you kept having to make excuses for like «Well, that part is ment as an allegory» or «God years are different than man years» or «Well, its says to not eat shelfish or pork in the hebrew scriptures, but apparently God changed his mind later, but that part about ga y's stays» I don't think anyone would have given it a second look had it not been at the point of a sword.

They aren't impressed by Republican claims that everything will get better for everybody once we cut taxes on the high - earners who «built that.»

He claims to put his special spice blend on «everything but ice cream.»

You can claim its everything or anything, its that he should be in AAA working on things, but a year plus into being a full starter he's shown little to no progress as a player

Would it really make sense that a club claiming to be functionally «house poor», who has a lengthy history of thriftiness, would be willing to leverage everything in the kitty and more on a relatively unknown and unproven player that no one rated anywhere near that 11th hour price point.

Whether it's Gazidis making ridiculous claims about our supposedly successful transfer window, even going so far as to suggest that everything went according to plann, or it's Wenger having the audacity to speak about taking a much more proactive approach to the re-signing of players with less than 2 years left on their current deals; which on it's own is a nothing story, it's football management 101, but let's not forget just a few weeks ago he was proudly championing his «ingenious» plan of having his best players playing in the last year of their respective contracts.

Junior Demetris Robertson, a 6» 1 athlete from Savannah who claims offers from Alabama, Florida, Georgia and others, impressed in just about everything he did, from agility drills to one - on - ones.

As it stands, this squad is fairly well positioned to compete for the Wenger Cup and make a deep run in the Europa, if and only if we play first stringers in Europe and use the bench for the League and FA Cups... that being said, and based on the fragility of the manager and the team in recent campaigns, it's more likely that Wenger will focus on a top 4 finish and the FA Cup... while the reasons for such an approach may appear logical, it would confirm a rather disturbing trend and appear counter intuitive for any team which claims to have higher aspirations... I feel that Wenger simply can't afford to put all his eggs in the Europa basket because if he fails the potential backlash could cripple any top 4 chances due to the aforementioned fragile psyche that tends to rear it's ugly head like our own personal groundhog day each and every February... furthermore, can you even imagine Wenger bringing in the necessary recruits to adequately supply top quality lineups in a Thursday / Sunday dominated schedule; based on everything I've seen in recent years, I can't see that happening... in fact, mark my words, it's more likely that we see Lacazette playing out wide in Alexis's position with Giroud at striker, than we see Wenger make the necessary moves to right this ship... god, I hope I'm wrong but is it really that far - fetched considering what we've witnessed for past several years

As soon as AOB recognises this then they bury their heads and claim Wenger has ultimate say on everything... Which is then disproven by Gazidis recent changes and how Wenger is losing power and articles like this one crop up about his reign coming to an end by Gazidis design.

Danny was involved in everything going forwards, was given wrongly offside when through on goal, earned a dangerous free kick and had a decent penalty claim turned down.

After both teams left everything on the field in a 39 - 35 Grizzlies win, Granite Bay receiver Marc Ellis chose not to claim regional dominance, but instead praise a worthy foe.

Chris Smalling has claimed that training sessions at Carrington provide him with everything he needs to improve as a defender, when being pitted against the likes of Robin van Persie, Wayne Rooney, Javier Hernandez and Danny Welbeck on a daily basis.

The Brazilian still has his heart set on a move to the Nou Camp, that we are sure, but trying to piece everything else together is proving a little difficult due to conflicting reports, numerous claims and denials (or lack of them).

However, discontent among supporters on Tyneside has been partially dissipated by a trio of excellent signings: Georginio Wijnaldum, captain of PSV's Eredivisie - winning side and acclaimed as the Dutch Player of the Year (ahead of Memphis Depay); Aleksandar Mitrovic, a Serbian striker who Jose Mourinho claimed «has everything to be a European star»; and Chancel Mbemba, Mitrovic's former team - mate at Anderlecht and a central defender of uncertain age who, it's hoped, will shore up a porous back four.

If you were to go around trying everything (and paying money for everything) because there's no evidence the claims ARE N'T true, you wouldn't have much time or money left on your hands.