Not exact matches
«
Thus far, we have
seen no
evidence that Canada or Mexico are willing to seriously engage on provisions that will lead to a rebalanced agreement.
I'm an Agnostic Atheist... I can't say with 100 % certainty that a god doesn't exist but I do not
see the
evidence supporting one and
thus I do not believe in one.
Thus we
see that the belief in Allah is based on both rational
evidence and intuitive insight,
evidence which is available to all men who are not heedless of the Divine portents.
Christians says faith is the
evidence of things not
seen but the die hard «the big bang is true» refuse to admit that all they have is
evidence for the thing not
seen thus making it a belief.
I don't disagree, but am merely pointing out that the
evidence presented
thus far falls short — and smells fishy (
see original post).
Atheism only means that the
evidence for a god doesn't add up and
thus I
see no reason to believe.
There are two types of atheism: One
see's no
evidence for any God's and
thus does not believe in any.
For a position that is a «non-position» and
thus requires no argument or
evidence, I
see a whole lot of arguments here being trotted out for atheism!
Thus he
saw modern cosmology and biological evolution as
evidence in favour of God, not against.
This too is in line with the natural conception rate reported from other trials,
thus suggesting that «expectant management» (wait - and -
see) may be a reasonable option in patients with unexplained infertility — though there is no strong
evidence in its favour.
Although it was first
seen in the 1940s to be the evolutionary glue that held species together, and
thus a significant evolutionary force, a few decades later when quantitative data on gene flow in plant populations began being collected, this view changed as
evidence seemed to indicate that gene flow was not all that significant.
Thus far, their
evidence indicates that each disease may be linked to severe neurological problems, including a rare disorder
seen in two patients called Opsoclonus - myoclonus - ataxia syndrome or OMS.
Your statement that «
Thus it is natural to look at the real world and
see whether there is
evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in ocean circulation or land use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric circulation.
Thus it is natural to look at the real world and
see whether there is
evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well).
In the absence of any hard
evidence thus far, scientists can only make educated guesses about what we'll actually
see when New Horizons makes its long - awaited flyby of Pluto and its moons on July 14.
Thus, we
see how the sexualization and rape of sisters by plantation owners and their being forced to mate with strangers for breeding purposes rather than for love when added to the inability of emasculated brothers to protect their females have contributed to a distance and distrust still in
evidence.
I am not at all being facetious when I say that this crudely plotted, bargain - basement action flick from Uganda is the best
evidence I've
seen thus far that movies are still alive and kicking.
A conversion to the
evidence - based salary schedule could
thus be
seen as a means of boosting starting teacher salaries without increasing expenditures on education.
Thus, for example, disparities in suspension rates by race are
seen as prima facie
evidence of discrimination rather than symptoms of social ills that strike some groups in America harder than others.
Given the
evidence that I
see thus far, more caution than that is warranted.
As
evidenced by everything we've
seen thus far, the focus of this installment is the Guardians» war against the Red Legion — A Cabal faction.
Your statement that «
Thus it is natural to look at the real world and
see whether there is
evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in ocean circulation or land use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric circulation.
I sit on the fence (I have not
seen compelling
evidence for or against human induced climate change),
thus I have no opinion as to who (or what) has caused what, if anything.
Thus in summary, lets
see what
evidence you have suggesting that cooler photons are actually absorbed by a warmer object.
thus it remains to be
seen what impact the wonderful new
evidence will have within the administration.
I've noticed that members of the legal community tend to not have much to say, or for that matter even undertake to suggest an abuse may have taken place, when a legal decision may be
seen as having very heavy political overtones — as
evidenced by the truth having become so weighted down as to be tethered,
thus clearing the way for the facts to be like blank cheques to be used as unscrupulous currency, by those who can simply choose to control the outcome.