Not exact matches
(Varied
Assessments) Continuous, authentic, and appropriate
assessment measures, including both
formative and summative ones, provide
evidence about every student's learning progress.
Because
formative assessment strategies and techniques produce so much information
about student learning,
formative assessment experts must be adept at recognizing which information is critical
evidence for moving teaching and learning forward and which information is not.
Accomplished
formative assessment teachers work fluently and automatically within the current instructional context to address students» immediate learning needs in real time — rapidly processing
evidence of student thinking and learning, automatically considering the learning targets, then making advantageous decisions
about the next steps of instruction to move learning forward, sometimes with a plan B or even C in mind.
The resources in this channel explain what
formative assessment is, why it's important for teachers to use this approach in the classroom, and how to use
formative assessments to gather
evidence about student learning and use this
evidence to adjust teaching.
But I believe it should be called
formative assessment because it's
about the quality of
evidence that teachers have for their instructional decisions.
Formative assessment involves teachers using
evidence of pupils» understanding and learning to make decisions, minute - by - minute and day - by - day,
about the next steps in teaching and learning.
Is there a way to engage in the essential work of
formative assessment, feedback, and differentiated instruction, while still gathering enough summative
evidence for a twice - a-week standard to make a professional judgment
about learning?