Sentences with phrase «evidence about your claim»

His current research seeks to document how people on either side of the controversy collect and use evidence about the claim that GMOs increase crop yields.

He or she can ask for your medical records and other evidence about your claim.

The resume portrays your skills and qualifications to hiring managers, but it also provides evidence about your claims.

Not exact matches

The Facts: There is no publicly available evidence to support this claim about the violent gang.

But the company also acknowledges that there is no evidence to back up the claims about the «V - Steam» in particular.

Pollock, whose documentary, «Strange Fruit,» premiered at the South by Southwest Festival on Saturday, claims the new security tape featured in the film points to a cover - up of evidence on the part of Ferguson police, and a false narrative painted about Brown by city officials.

Even if you didn't have those cases, the very evidence that the Attorney General relies on for his advertising claim is that he says DraftKings suggests in its advertising that anyone can win and that's not true because about 1 % of players win a majority of the prizes.

«There is a lot to like about the book; Chapin has done extensive research and relies on both primary and secondary sources as she provides evidence for her claims.»

But he cautioned that there was not enough evidence for many of the genetic claims being made about exercise and nutrition, and worried that many people would not be able to distinguish the services that are scientifically rigorous from those that are not.

The university said it asked Facebook for evidence to support its claims about Kogan but hasn't received a response.

Among the evidence that would shift our expectations in this regard would be: material equity market deterioration, further weakness in regional Fed and purchasing managers indices, a slowing in real personal income, a spike in new claims for unemployment toward the 340,000 level, an abrupt drop in consumer confidence about 10 - 20 points below its 12 - month average, and at least some amount of slowing in employment growth and aggregate hours worked.

Accordingly, a year - over-year increase in new claims of about 20 % (which would currently equate to a level of about 340,000 weekly new claims) would create a significant concern of a new recession in progress, particularly if coupled with other evidence such as equity market weakness and slowing growth in real personal income.

There is endless scientific evidence that contradicts just about everything the bible claims.

In fact, there is nothing special about christianity — it is just one of many cults that claim to have all the answers, none of which provide any real evidence for any of their supernatural claims.

And that had absolutely nothing to do with his post about applying the same rigors of evidence that you would apply to a number of other claims.

If you require evidence as strong as the extraordinary claims merit, then you will be in the best position to arrive at a justified belief about God.

I suspect the «overwhelming» empirical evidence you claim will slowly be refuted as we learn more about ancient american cultures.

We reasonably expect evidence to support claims about the natural world and you haven't shown evidence that God interacts with the natural world.

All I see are a lot of believers making a lot of claims — often contradictory — unsupported by any evidence about God and his teachings.

If this is your level of understanding of how Science works — it would explain why you might think other claims about Gods existing as being evidence.

Funny that you find the issues with interstellar travel and just anectodes as evidence is not enough to convince you, yet anectodes and even more outrageous claims and you are convinced about Jesus / God.

Of course, we CAN make objective, evidence - based claims about BEHAVIOR.

So should we take the tendency for certain people to get religious feelings about Apple as evidence for the legitimacy of claims that Steve Jobs is god?

What if we factor in the evidence for the existence of God, the Messianic claims Jesus made about himself, how his resurrection would act as the vindication of them, and a host of other details?

To say there is no evidence for the real existence of the most discussed figure in history denies the unique manner in which Christianity came about (a claim that God came in the flesh conveyed with real life details, etc).

And megalomania would be claiming to know all about these things — spirits and gods — when you really have no hard evidence whatsoever to back up your claims.

For example, we might have a difficult time finding appropriate historical evidence for claims about Jesus's life.

Also, if he claims for statements about Jesus» ultimate significance a self - evidence or demonstration in no way dependent upon participation in the community of faith, he would not intend his statements to be theological in the sense of my definition.

There is, in fact, plenty of evidence that points toward the reality of God and that makes reasonable the Christian claim about Jesus Christ.

However, Whitehead uses the experience of CE as evidenced for an objective claim, so it seems as if he is making an objective claim about it, and hence it could be erroneous, since there could be a difference between «seems» and «is.»

Faith is the denial of observation so that belief can be preserved» Now religion is USING the discoveries of science to CLAIM IT IS EVIDENCE to support their unevidenced claims... talk about fraud and hypocrisy.

Archaeology give undeniable evidence that the Bible is the most trustworthy document of antiquity and there is nothing even remotely close to it, and it gives great evidence to the existence of Jesus as well as some of the Bible's claims about Him.

Last, logistics and literary - critical evidence gives great credence that the most logical conclusion about the Biblical claims concerning Jesus are that they are all in fact true.

What about the scientific evidence favoring the Medjugorie visionaries who claim to see the Blessed Virgin Mary?

Theology can not be historically empirical in the sense that claims about Jesus» special relationship to God could be proved by historical evidence, for the evidence will always be consistent with various speculative hypotheses.

you should have read the paragraph after paragraph that Russ posted in a previous story when confronted with the simple question about providing evidence outside of the bible for the supernatural claims made in the bible......

I said that he was controversial, and that the people who DO believe those things about him can point to some pretty solid evidence to back up their claim.

Yet the only evidence Wilson even offers in the case of Gresham is his disputed claim about her son's interview.

Nobo backs up his claims about transition and concrescence with impressive textual evidence.

Most, however, do say that if there is enough evidence to support a certain claim, then that is the current truth about that claim.

I corrected you both times, that I never made a claim about the existence of minds or evidence (though isn't it blatantly obvious to you, me, and pretty much everyone, that they do exist?).

I can't prove God's existence just as much as scientist can't prove the big bang... there is evidence of both but to reach a conclusion takes faith... one side leaves hope and the other does not... maybe I'm agnostic too because I don't claim to know everything about why I'm here, I have to have faith... Honestly, I'm sick of the extremes on both sides... the conservative judgmental Christian, who never thought through things as to why the believe what they do (ie Dinosaurs, cavemen, evolution, etc.) and the intellectually arrogant atheist and humanists.

You may make a claim about the bible that needs to be backed up by evidence concerning it's «truthiness».

Without verified evidence that your god exists, all claims you make about it are illogical and pointless.

[49] Dawkins therefore commits himself here to an empirical claim about the geological record, in contrast to his earlier claim that, «The paleontological evidence can be argued about, and I am not qualified to judge it.»

There isn't, David argues, any evidence for the governor's claims about the benefits of gambling, and the governor himself presents none, and a great deal of evidence against it.

In the light of that with critical engagement, it would be to onus on the character to prove his point about «God» not changing, to provide evidence and make therefore a reasoned proposition for what he claims to be true so it can be considered.

Both someone who requires evidence to make claims about belief and also sits in contemplation of what a risen Savior means for humanity.

I asked a physicist, Dr P E Hodgson, staunch Catholic as well as a physicist, whether the claim that a moving body is constantly in and out of existence (which claim the above understanding of motion implies) was acceptable to science and he replied «there are speculations about this, but no experimental evidence».

Whatever verifiable evidence you can claim about how the exercise program worked for others, you have NO evidence about how it'll work for you.