Sentences with phrase «evidence against any theory»

This based on some of the absolute worst pseduo science I've read where they claim that testosterone binds to mercury in the brain (it's always mercury with them, despite the mountain of evidence against the theory).

The treatment group read an article that laid out scientific evidence against the theory of a fixed intelligence that can not grow and change.

There is always evidence for and evidence against any theory.

Such deceitful statements coming from the IPCC should be enough to raise serious doubts about anthropogenic global warming (AGW) even without the abundant physical evidence against the theory.

In this situation rejecting a «unit root null hypothesis» or not rejecting a «no unit root null hypothesis» can be taken as evidence against the theory.

Not exact matches

That could in theory help stock markets, which are generally boosted by lower rates, though investors will be weighing that against the evidence that the underlying economy is not as strong as hoped.

Mr. Hawking wins easy battles against uneducated (in science) religious persons, but taking his statement on perspective, He is based on assumptions with serious underlying problems, basically everything from mathematics, to the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and relativity, and the lack of proof and evidence for string theories, he is launching a very aggressive statement, probably his last effort on life to counter the anthropomorphic ideas of God, and this is very common in all scientists.

We do not continue to buttress bad theories against the tsunami of evidence to the contrary of how it suposes the world to operate.

Many religious folks accept evolutionary theory because they know they can't argue against factual evidence.

Are you saying that you no longer have any problem with evolution, the big bang theory, radio carbon dating, the age of the Earth, the scientific unlikelihood of the great flood, and the archeological evidence against the chronology of the bible story?

Later Einstein on other grounds developed the theory of relativity; only then did the Michelson - Morley experiment, performed twenty - five years earlier, appear as important evidence against all ether theories.

Although scientists behave as if their theories are facts, often arguing ferociously against critics, key paradigms of science can shift rapidly and fundamentally when empirical evidence reaches a tipping point.

To understand the recently discovered evidence against Whitehead's theory it is necessary to examine the Newtonian gravitational law in the light of Einstein's and Whitehead's / theories.

The influence of these older evolutionary cosmologies on Whitehead's thought, moreover, is never carefully examined so much as it is presupposed.1 Against such presuppositions, I shall argue here that evolution and evolutionist theories play no significant role in Whitehead's metaphysics, and that there is no evidence in his major works of any significant influence from earlier process - oriented «evolutionary cosmologies.»

The scientific method argument could be used against the M - Theory because some of the required evidence to prove the theory has no possible teTheory because some of the required evidence to prove the theory has no possible tetheory has no possible testing.

Same for evolution, evolutionary theory is not fully proven (although there is NO evidence found that goes against it which makes it very very likely to be correct), but its a FACT that we evolved along with all other life on earth.

BRC, there is no evidence?!?! what an uneducated statement, there are hundreds / thousands of books and studies, research by thousands of scientists, some christians some not... evolution is REAL... it's a proven theory and i would put that against your ONE book that was written when everyone thought the earth was flat.

No evidences from human experiences (Holocaust, hurricanes, slavery) or from other interpretations (evolutionary theory and Marxism) will ever count against the revelation whatever the content of the «ultimate purpose» might be.

On Charles Darwin's 200th birthday, a new Zogby poll shows that the majority of Americans favor teaching biological evidence both for and against evolutionary theory.

The great fact that drives a coach and horses through the theory of evolution, the lack of fossil (or skeletal) evidence for it, is here described dismissively as «one of the arguments against».

There is a quite widely held theory in the football world that Arsenal have become a team that just can not seem to produce our best performances when it really matters and there is evidence that the proponents of this theory can point to for support, most recently the slips against the likes of Swansea and Man United that effectively ended our chances of the Premier League title.

I didn't see anybody argue against that logical theory, or ask for evidence, or call it a «conspiracy theory».

Pseudoscience never sees the need to change, no matter how much evidence piles up against a theory.

«Early on the commissioner did not allow Carl Paladino, as it relates to the conspiracy theory, that they were conspiring against him, she didn't allow that evidence in because all of that stuff was submitted after the date that you had to admit it,» Buffalo District Parent Coordinating Council President Sam Radford explained.

A judge ruled the jury reached the verdict against the preponderance of evidence in the case because prosecutors strayed from the legal theory presented in the original indictment.

«Further evidence found against ancient «killer walrus» theory.»

The theories point to purported inconsistencies in the events of Nov. 22, 1963, and in the evidence collected against Oswald.

Celebrated for his pendulum experiment in 1851, Foucault also produced decisive evidence against the particle theory of light, invented the gyroscope, perfected the reflecting telescope and measured the sun's distance

A wealth of observational evidence made it possible to test the theory against a cosmic instead of a local background.

A jury assessing evidence against a defendant, a CEO evaluating information about a company or a scientist weighing data in favor of a theory will undergo the same cognitive process.

Despite the perilous odds stacked against them in vaccine court, the evidence of a vaccine / autism link is so strong that vaccine court judges and government agencies have now recognized at least two theories of how vaccines cause autism: the Vaccine - to - ADEM - to - ASD link in Bailey Banks» case, and vaccine - induced aggravation of an underlying mitochondrial dysfunction that caused full - blown autism in the Hannah Poling case.

Despite the evidence stacked up against the theory, it is strangely tenacious.

Alternatively, the planet could be evidence against the migration theory, suggesting that giant planets can in fact form close in to their stars.

Evidence indicates that increased iodine consumption replaces and therefore helps detox other halogens, such as fluoride and bromide, and even toxic metals like lead, aluminum and mercury.11 One theory is that liberal amounts of iodine in the diet can protect against the harmful effects of fluoridated water.12 Iodine supports the immune system and protects against abnormal growth of bacteria in the stomach.13

Shows scientific proof against the theory of evolution and evidence for creation, gives.

If there had been wide variation in enrollment trends among the participating schools, that would count as evidence against the Overregulation Theory.

It also includes refuting arguments and conspiracy theories that movement conservative offer as evidence against the standards — and demanding that they stop embracing the kind of shoddy thinking that no respectable movement conservative icon — especially Kirk and Reagan — would even find acceptable in a conversation.

re: «In the distribution of expert estimates we find no evidence in support of the ** two - camps theory **, as shown in the following graph...» — first this arguing against a falsity put out by scientific incompetents and professional skeptics & deniers.

3) Isn't there overwhelming observational evidence against the «theory»?

Finally for now, empirical evidence mounts against the IPCC theory.

But since they're actually aware of the real evidence for and against the theories, not only is their work useful, they also know that the other theories aren't obviously wrong at all.

Scientific theories are tested, and stand or fall, against the evidence.

In fact the evidence against your pet theory is mounting.

If the ocean cooled over long periods we would call it evidence against (disconfirmation) of the theory.

Not having a theory is evidence against a proposition.

«confirm» and «disconfirm» captures the way evidence and theory work together, or in your parlance «counts for» and «counts against»

One truly has to wonder what alternate reality Phil Shabecoff lives in, regarding his «crimes against humanity» comment at Gelbspan's post, which happens to be an insider's reference to Gelbspan's 2004 Boiling Point book chapter 3 title, «Criminals Against humanity,» which contains on page 51 Gelbspan's favorite phrase bit of so - called smoking gun evidence, the leaked memo phrase «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.against humanity» comment at Gelbspan's post, which happens to be an insider's reference to Gelbspan's 2004 Boiling Point book chapter 3 title, «Criminals Against humanity,» which contains on page 51 Gelbspan's favorite phrase bit of so - called smoking gun evidence, the leaked memo phrase «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.Against humanity,» which contains on page 51 Gelbspan's favorite phrase bit of so - called smoking gun evidence, the leaked memo phrase «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.»

I'm against Ocean Acidification theory because I've done loads and loads of background reading... about the lack of credible scientific evidence that it represents any kind of problem... in the eyes of all those undecideds who can't make up their mind whether they agree with me on climate science or whether I'm talking bollocks...»

For that we need to go back to the lab experiment, the empirical basis of global «greenhouse» theory, and pit that empirical evidence against the hugely complex real - world environment.

There is little evidence of that and it descends into the grand conspiracy theories that people who rail against the IPCC and AGW are so fond of.