Sentences with phrase «evidence against evolution»

«Schools censor from students the evidence against evolution.

-- You have tried to provide evidence against evolution, but have not succeeded.

There is no evidence against evolution in Johnson's essay.

There is more evidence against evolution than for it.

1) Evolution does not predict true chimeras; in fact, a true chimera would be evidence against evolution.

In fact, if we ever observed a frog turn into a cow, it would be very strong evidence against evolution.

Not exact matches

To say that evolution was «proven» 100 years ago is to disregard the fact that even Darwin doubted his own contentions (as he states in origin of species), for every bit of scientific evidence for evolution there is scientific evidence against it.

To say that «for every bit of scientific evidence for evolution there is scientific evidence against it.

What I think is funny is that creationist use this as supposed «evidence» against evolution, yet have no explanation as to why there are any fossils at all.

Are you saying that you no longer have any problem with evolution, the big bang theory, radio carbon dating, the age of the Earth, the scientific unlikelihood of the great flood, and the archeological evidence against the chronology of the bible story?

People just have determined to believe in atheistic / naturalistic evolution despite the utter paucity of support for it, and the overwhelming evidence (in terms of what we know of the nature and benefit of mutations) against it.

For anyone interested in the evidence against creationism and for evolution in the anatomy of creatures living today, I'd suggest «Some More of God's Greatest Mistakes» at oolon.awardspace.com/SMOGGM.htm.

There is just as much and as little evidence for and against religious beliefs as there is for, for example, the big bang, or evolution.

See they can teach evolution in schools, not due it being a conspiracy against the poor persecuted christards like you but due to it being based on solid acceptable evidence... regardless of how stupid you may wish to continue to be on the subject, you don't change the facts.

Second, what evidence is there against evolution?

The influence of these older evolutionary cosmologies on Whitehead's thought, moreover, is never carefully examined so much as it is presupposed.1 Against such presuppositions, I shall argue here that evolution and evolutionist theories play no significant role in Whitehead's metaphysics, and that there is no evidence in his major works of any significant influence from earlier process - oriented «evolutionary cosmologies.»

Christians to deny evolution by natural selection, or to assert against all evidence that the earth is 10,000 years old rather than four and a half billion years, I can not imagine anyone being counted among the goats at the Last Judgment because when faced with what they sincerely believed to be a choice between God and Darwin, they chose God.

Thus he saw modern cosmology and biological evolution as evidence in favour of God, not against.

If there is a war against christianity, it is between christian extremists and those «who require evidence prior to believing», and seeing as how there is no evidence supporting creation by an almighty whatever, and that there is tons of evidence supporting evolution, the most effective weapon in the «war» is the utter stupidity that keeps emanating from the mouths of christian loudmouths.

The evidence from paleontology, genetics and other evolutionary sciences is also against the existence of any immanent force or vital principle directing evolution toward the production of specified kinds of organisms (emphases added).

Same for evolution, evolutionary theory is not fully proven (although there is NO evidence found that goes against it which makes it very very likely to be correct), but its a FACT that we evolved along with all other life on earth.

BRC, there is no evidence?!?! what an uneducated statement, there are hundreds / thousands of books and studies, research by thousands of scientists, some christians some not... evolution is REAL... it's a proven theory and i would put that against your ONE book that was written when everyone thought the earth was flat.

a. Evolution, as a science, is based upon testing ideas against evidence.

The great fact that drives a coach and horses through the theory of evolution, the lack of fossil (or skeletal) evidence for it, is here described dismissively as «one of the arguments against».

Darwin was only half - right about evolution: evidence against natural selection is mounting up, argue Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli - Palmarini

The discoveries reported in two independent studies in the American Journal of Human Genetics on January 7 add to evidence for an important role for interspecies relations in human evolution and specifically in the evolution of the innate immune system, which serves as the body's first line of defense against infection.

Or that his argument against language evolution hinges on a lack of testable evidence, while he declares that he knows how language originated — without any testable evidence.

However, an extinct group of non-ancestral humans seems better evidence for evolution than against it; how did such a group of people appear if they and humans did not both evolve from a common ancestor?

NASA's Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution Mission, or MAVEN, in development for a 2013 launch, may provide evidence for or against this new interpretation of the Red Planet's environmental history.

Shows scientific proof against the theory of evolution and evidence for creation, gives.

The best evidence of this is the evolution of the strategy and tactics our opponents have used against us.

Do you think that the fact that there is still considerable debate on the web (including by some people who are scientists and engineers) in regards to evolution means that there is legitimate scientific evidence against it?