Sentences with phrase «evidence against that point»

And parents are not asking for trouble by co-sleeping, there is ample evidence against that point of view despite one's personal experience.

Not exact matches

I know it's not a nice thing to say, but at this point, the evidence is squarely against you.

And, while GDPR advocates have pointed to the lobbying Google and Facebook have done against the law as evidence that it will be effective, that is to completely miss the point: of course neither company wants to incur the costs entailed in such significant regulation, which will absolutely restrict the amount of information they can collect.

I'm curious, was there a point to having this particular selection of quotes or was it more to just pretend / look like you had a lot of «evidence» against?

Rather than go highlighting or cherry picking different stories in the ancient text that point to very disturbing characteristics, (because that would bog us down away from my point and launch a ti.t for tat against someone who has already displayed belief over evidence is what matters to him), I will add to my «doctrine» statement that has inflamed and dominated your attention.

page 285 ^ Robert M. Price (an atheist who denies existence) agrees that this perspective runs against the views of the majority of scholars: Robert M. Price «Jesus at the Vanishing Point» in The Historical Jesus: Five Views edited by James K. Beilby & Paul Rhodes Eddy, 2009 InterVarsity, ISBN 028106329X page 61 [10] Michael Grant (a cla ssicist) states that «In recent years, «no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non historicity of Jesus» or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary.»

One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they they base their beliefs on.

Even more to the point you have Hitler, a man who evoked god countless times in his speeches, had the nazis were belt buckles that said «God with us» and you see this as mountains of evidence AGAINST him being a christian?

Although scientists behave as if their theories are facts, often arguing ferociously against critics, key paradigms of science can shift rapidly and fundamentally when empirical evidence reaches a tipping point.

One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very scriptures they base their beliefs on.

What appears from a Whiteheadian point of view to be truly postmodern is the emergence of new root metaphors or paradigms, radically thought through, and rigorously tested against the whole range of evidence.

The entire account of the Fall of the angels points to that conclusion: that the decision for or against God starts with an interpretation of God and then all the evidence of the outside world is marshaled to support that conclusion.

Put against all actual evidence, we more often than not find ourselves more than 10 points behind the champions in the final league table.

1987 was the last time that the Saints took three points away from Arsenal in our own back yard, but three straight victories, including the recent 1 - 0 victory at Old Trafford against a beleaguered Manchester United, is evidence, if needed, that Ronald Koeman's side should not be taken lightly.

There is a quite widely held theory in the football world that Arsenal have become a team that just can not seem to produce our best performances when it really matters and there is evidence that the proponents of this theory can point to for support, most recently the slips against the likes of Swansea and Man United that effectively ended our chances of the Premier League title.

On the playing side the club has battled manfully to get themselves out of the relegation dogfight, as evidenced by last nights last gasp point against Sunderland, it will take a few more such battles to see them make their way our of trouble but I have a sneaky feeling that they could pull off a Houdini.

But prior evidence, particularly games against the fellow top six sides under Jose Mourinho, quite clearly points to systemic issues across United's attacking setup which undercuts the blame that is willingly shoved on the Armenian.

We will support any criminal action against those involved in such behaviour, and should evidence point to the involvement of Chelsea season ticket holders or members the club will take the strongest possible action against them including banning orders.»

Last season, they were overly reliant on perimeter shooting — as evidenced by the 37 3 - point attempts and only 10 points in the paint against Mercer.

A case in point was when the Special Development Initiatives Ministry GH cents 800,000 website issue came up, he was all over trying to do damage control, insisting against all the available evidence that, it was rather GH cents 80,000.

Legislator Tom Barraga (R - East Islip), who spent over 20 years in Albany as an assemblyman, voted along with legislators Jay Schneiderman (I - Montauk) and Tom Cilmi (R - Bay Shore) against the county Legislature's budget — pointing to past bailouts in New York City and Nassau County as evidence the legislation would not be much of a risk at all.

However, there was also evidence of possible discrimination against ethnic minorities at some points in the system.

Meanwhile, some of them have made useful statements while a few have declined even with the glaring evidences that were found against them in terms of material cash, documents and property recovered pointing to their compromise.

«I was outspoken against it, beginning 15 - years ago because at the point and time, there was no medical evidence whatsoever that there was legitimate medicinal use for marijuna.

While the committee said there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the relationship at any point constituted «quid pro quo sexual harassment,» it unanimously agreed Wozniak's subsequent actions and those of her attorney amounted to retaliation against Farah (who was not named in the report).

Tina Bennet, an attorney who now lives in neighboring Madison County, ran against Fitzpatrick in 2007, and she pointed to his campaign spending as evidence that he shouldn't oversee a panel charged with reforming election laws.

Now a University of Colorado Cancer Center study published online ahead of print in the journal Oncogene offers compelling evidence explaining this failure and offering a possible strategy for the use of retinoic acid or other retinoids against some breast cancers: Because early clinical trials are often offered to patients who have already tried other more established therapies, breast cancer cells may have been pushed past an important tipping point that offers retinoic acid resistance.

The theories point to purported inconsistencies in the events of Nov. 22, 1963, and in the evidence collected against Oswald.

Advocates point to evidence of benefits from police use of similar devices: reduced use of force, reduced complaints against officers, a reduction in crime and improved evidence gathering.

Respondents in this year's survey pointed to five main causes of the field's less than favorable reputation: drug and product recalls such as the withdrawal of Avandia; safety issues such as the discovery of problems with raw material from China used in medical products; scandals, including evidence that pharmaceutical companies have failed to release data from trials whose results cast doubts on their drugs» safety and efficacy; lawsuits brought against companies that failed to warn patients of problems with their products; and ethical issues such as kickbacks for physicians promoting specific medications.

Wilson's article does point out some interesting initial evidence against the long - term use of antipsychotics in schizophrenia.

The geneticists then compared the genetic profile of an Antioquian carrier of E280A against genetic profiles from three potential continents of origin, and the evidence pointed to Western Europe.

The AHA recommendations are at best incorrect and at worst deliberately misleading, and the sum of the actual evidence points to protein as being protective against heart disease, osteoporosis, kidney disease, and liver problems — all things protein is supposed to initiate or worsen.

Unfortunately, the evidence for or against use of soy doesn't point in one clear direction.

Overall, scientific evidence points to curcumin as an effective strategy against anxiety and depression.

Normally I would post studies here but the evidence is so conclusive against smoking that there is no point.

Frequently, we have had to point out that courses cited to us as evidence against our findings were not required courses but electives, just as our paper had made clear.

``... The evidence against VAM is at this point overwhelming.

State the major points of the work and the evidence against every argument.

History is not an exact science and thus there are many points of view and a lot evidence for an against them, so even if you have your own opinion and enough evidence to support it, My Thesis Writing Service thinks that it would be wise for you to anticipate evidence that supports other points of view.

The idea was to provide one data point (and there are many others as well) as strong disconfirming evidence against associating «expensive» with seemingly «high P / E» multiples.

However, like Dreman points out there is reams of evidence against market timing and TAA.

Taking «backfire effect» as a starting point — a phrase coined to describe how people often maintain or even strengthen their beliefs when given factual evidence against them — Tillmans has interviewed scientists, politicians, journalists, and social workers in an effort to understand the political climate in recent decades, with a particular focus on right - wing populism and fake news.

Taking as a starting point the «backfire effect» — a phrase coined to describe how people often maintain or even strengthen their beliefs when given factual evidence against them — Tillmans interviewed scientists, politicians, journalists, and social workers in an effort to understand changes in the international political climate in recent decades, with a particular focus on right - wing populism and fake news.

There is all sorts of evidence for and against natural climate change at various stages of history (and prehistory) that bears discussing, but we rarely ever get to it because everyone is banging on about the hockey stick being inaccurate or accurate (depending on your point of view).

I contend that people should not point to the recent extreme warmth as evidence of global warming any more than they should point to the extreme cold of February as proof against.

Of course, such items do need to be scientifically assessed and reported, but their context and confidence should also be conveyed to avoid the almost laughable situation of having a minor new point that goes against conventional preponderance of evidence conclusions as somehow «falsifying» the mainstream conclusion — that was the tried - and - true trick the American Tobacco Institute used for 30 years of successful denial and delay tactics.

The associations I point to among the man - caused global warming promoters is really just a secondary problem, with the relevance being simply to amplify the core problem: nobody corroborates the corruption accusation against skeptic scientists, and it has been devoid of evidence to prove it true from its inception.

As you, Bill, should realize, it is difficult for an honest peer review officer — even one who does not have a personal pecuniary or professional interest in the support of a particular point of view — to contest an assertion in a manuscript which is clearly supported by a previously peer - reviewed article, a copy of which has come to said review officer along with the manuscript in question, all highlighted and redlined «with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one was to be used as evidence against us.»

If I had conclusive evidence against AGW (Not the smoking gun, just an «hey guys you made a mistake there») and didn't get published, I'd shrug it off and keep working at this point.