Sentences with phrase «evidence against your god»

For instance — You can throw as much evidence against a god disproving it... lets say Thor for example... but if someone has faith in Thor... your communication is mute.

The magnitude of evil in the world seems like excellent evidence against God's existence.

There is no evidence for God, but that is not logically in itself evidence against God.

Unless you have evidence against God that I am completely unaware of.

Such feelings, Freud says, are often the unconscious basis for faith, and they were too strong in Dostoevsky to be overcome by his mind that saw the evidence against God so clearly.

Given all the objective evidence against the gods so far worshiped, it's not unreasonable to ask for objective evidence for a god.

To the rest of us, the evidence against your god is completely obvious.

Not exact matches

Mr. Hawking wins easy battles against uneducated (in science) religious persons, but taking his statement on perspective, He is based on assumptions with serious underlying problems, basically everything from mathematics, to the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and relativity, and the lack of proof and evidence for string theories, he is launching a very aggressive statement, probably his last effort on life to counter the anthropomorphic ideas of God, and this is very common in all scientists.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

You said, «But I do know you have no evidence AT ALL to support your claims against God or Christianity.

So, if you are against birth control because of your belief in your god, please provide verifiable evidence that your god exists.

You may say there is zero evidence for gods or souls; there is also zero evidence against.

Yes youtube has a collected Biblical evidence of false churches against the truth of God.

You are going against all evidences by denying God.

The existence of God can only be dis - proven by factual evidence, none of which has been produced against it.

The Christian god is guilty of horrid crimes against humans Evidenced by the atrocities recorded in the bible

I don't have a belief on the situation one way or the other, my grounding in the question of any God or gods comes from the lack of evidence for or against.

I actually do find evidence supporting Christianity and God in general throughout history, mathematics, and science, but you will call me blind nonetheless because you adore grouping people together to discriminate against them for actually comprehending something you can not fathom.

On the contrary, I believe there is far more compelling evidence for the existence of God, than against.

Sadly, these initiatives are fought tooth and nail by anti-gay groups (sadly pretty much all of which identify as Christian) who want to claim (against all evidence) that being gay makes you more likely to commit suicide not anything that you suffer as a result of being gay, just some arbitrary offense against God thing.

I was not arguing for the existence of God... I was arguing against your declaration that there is no evidence.

«An atheist is someone who is certain that God does not exist, someone who has compelling evidence against the existence of God.

And as you've obviously researched all religions to select the one you did, show us the evidence against the other gods and why you made your choice.

Huebert — I don't believe that a god exists; however, I do recognize there is neither evidence for or against a supreme being.

, directed against Brunner in 1934, but rather the book about the evidence for God of Anselm of Canterbury which appeared in 1931.

I grew up an atheist, but when I studied it, I found the evidence FOR God to be more compelling than against.

Even more to the point you have Hitler, a man who evoked god countless times in his speeches, had the nazis were belt buckles that said «God with us» and you see this as mountains of evidence AGAINST him being a christigod countless times in his speeches, had the nazis were belt buckles that said «God with us» and you see this as mountains of evidence AGAINST him being a christiGod with us» and you see this as mountains of evidence AGAINST him being a christian?

For anyone interested in the evidence against creationism and for evolution in the anatomy of creatures living today, I'd suggest «Some More of God's Greatest Mistakes» at oolon.awardspace.com/SMOGGM.htm.

Rather we are well reminded that the Judaeo - Christian God is the immediate sustainer of all, and that to give a scientific explanation is more evidence for the Creator than against him.

For Luke — it was evidence that Jesus was innocent of the charges against him — a righteous martyr, vindicated by god.

Evidence for or against the reality of God, if it is there, pervades every moment of the experience of existence, every employment of reason, every act of consciousness, every encounter with the world around us.

But this is not evidence against the existence of God but merely evidence of the duality of nature.

Learn the history of the Jewish people, that is all the evidence you need, if you reject this evidence then you reject Life, you are living in Denial, you are lying to yourself stop bothering us faithful believers cause you will be cursed by the God of Israel, The ten commandments says all Jews must believe in the God of Abraham so stop trying to make us sin against our God.

No, I wasted 5 hours listening to him rehash the same old and tired lines about why he believes and how everyone will burn in hell and how there is all this «real» scientific «evidence,» but the scientists and the media won't talk about it because they want us to turn against god.

And the evidence of Scripture is that Israel and the church continued to battle for this discernment of God, always against the temptation to drive God back to heaven, to squeeze God back into the safety, serenity and irrelevance of the other gods.

Both the negative evidence in experience and the law - abiding, cause - and - effect nature of God's world are against any such absolute certainty.

Christians to deny evolution by natural selection, or to assert against all evidence that the earth is 10,000 years old rather than four and a half billion years, I can not imagine anyone being counted among the goats at the Last Judgment because when faced with what they sincerely believed to be a choice between God and Darwin, they chose God.

Science doesn't say anything about god, for or against, because there is no evidence to base it on.

Thus he saw modern cosmology and biological evolution as evidence in favour of God, not against.

I applaud Atheists for their challenging Christians for their beliefs, but there is a completely untapped source of evidence against the existence of their God... the daily life of the Christian (as can be seen to a small extent in a blog like this.

very short apparently... I am sorry for whatever happened in your life that has made you so very unhappy... it sure comes thru... I guess since neither of us can prove evidence for or against the existence of God..

It's quite sad and says more about the state of the heart of those writing rather than any evidence against the existence of God.

The entire account of the Fall of the angels points to that conclusion: that the decision for or against God starts with an interpretation of God and then all the evidence of the outside world is marshaled to support that conclusion.

You said: «Even if we were on the same plane with angels, you are perfect evidence, for those who believe, of an intelligent man rebelling against God making it very reasonable to believe in an «intelligent» angel rebelling against God.»

Conversely, if Wright's materialist account of moral progress fails, this also provides evidence neither for nor against anything transcendent: maybe God drives moral progress or maybe a different materialist account could explain the facts

Jesus and the message of the gospel were not against other religions, but against false religion as evidenced by insincerity and hypocrisy in relation to one's God and one's neighbour.

Students are asked to decide whether this provides evidence for or against the existence of God.