Sentences with phrase «evidence at the high court»

Dan Johnson has been giving evidence at the High Court where Sir Cliff is seeking damages from the BBC for how it reported the police investigation into alleged abuse.

Not exact matches

The judge, who had analysed evidence at a trial in the Family Division of the High Court in London earlier this month, said he had reached his decision with «profound sadness».

Mr Justice MacDonald analysed evidence at hearings in the Family Division of the High Court in January.

The conviction was later overturned by the High Court, which found «there was no evidence to suggest that any of the followers of the appellant's «tweet» found it to be of a menacing character or, at a time when the threat of terrorism is real, even minimally alarming.»

In executing five court - authorized search warrants at addresses on High View Court and Pine Street in Nyack, it is alleged that detectives recovered evidence of the defendants» jobs, income, living expenses and residcourt - authorized search warrants at addresses on High View Court and Pine Street in Nyack, it is alleged that detectives recovered evidence of the defendants» jobs, income, living expenses and residCourt and Pine Street in Nyack, it is alleged that detectives recovered evidence of the defendants» jobs, income, living expenses and residency.

Based on evidence gathered so far in the matter, a case of Criminal Conspiracy and unlawful possession of prohibited firearms was filed by the Nigeria Police Force at Federal High Court Lokoja on 16th March, 2018 against the two principal suspects (i) Kabiru Saidu a.k.a Osama (ii) Nuhu Salisu a.k.a Small, Senator Dino Melaye and Alhaji Mohammed Audu.

«After carefully weighing the evidence, the court agreed with the Justice Department and 33 state attorneys general that executives at the highest levels of Apple orchestrated a conspiracy with five major publishers to raise e-book prices,» the assistant attorney general in charge of the DoJ's antitrust division, Bill Baer, said.

Five Supreme Court justices are analysing evidence at a hearing in London following rulings by judges in the High Court and Court of Appeal.

Five Supreme Court justices are analysing evidence at a hearing in London following rulings by judges in the High Court...

[3] In that case, the Ontario Court of Justice judge found that searches at a high school by a sniffer dog and police were unconstitutional and excluded the evidence found as a result of such searches.

New Brunswick's highest court recently quashed Dennis Oland's second - degree murder conviction in the death of his father, stating that the jury had sufficient evidence to reasonably convict Dennis Oland of murder, but had been improperly instructed on what was needed to arrive at that conclusion.

In Wilson v Her Majesty's Advocate 2009 JC 336, which also concerned opinion evidence, the High Court of Justiciary, in an opinion delivered by Lord Wheatley, stated the test thus (at para 58): «[T] he subject - matter under discussion must be necessary for the proper resolution of the dispute, and be such that a judge or jury without instruction or advice in the particular area of knowledge or experience would be unable to reach a sound conclusion without the help of a witness who had such specialised knowledge or experience.»

The high court reinstated the decision of the trial judge, who had ordered the parties negotiate utilization of the funds and arrive at a mutually agreeable implementation process or submit further evidence so the court could make that determination.

During their interview with the Citizen, the lawyers called for a high - level national debate over new media and its growing impact on Canadian court proceedings and spoke of how they deliberately put a protective «code of silence» on the Williams evidence — even within their own office — and how they agonized for days over the statement Edelson read in court at the end of the hearing.

For instance in Li itself, the error that the High Court identified was that the Tribunal had given «too much weight» to the fact that the applicant had had several opportunities to present evidence, and «insufficient weight to her need to present further evidence» (at [85]-RRB-.

And I think that criminal courts here have some of the jurisprudence I've seen demonstrates a stricter interest in the nuts and bolts of adducing social media evidence because of course there's a liberty interest at stake and making sure the evidence fits I think is a higher bar to me.

The Court of Appeal had erred by placing «too high a premium on the «full appreciation» of evidence that can be gained at a conventional trial, given that such a trial is not a realistic alternative for most litigants.»

On the rare occasions that conduct is a relevant factor, the following approach may be adopted; Allegations of conduct should be included in Form E although the parties should be discouraged from raising allegations of conduct unless absolutely necessary; The district judge should clarify at the directions appointment whether conduct is being pursued and, if so, order particulars to be given of the precise allegations relied on and give directions as to the evidence to be adduced by each party; An alternative route may be to defer the filing and service of conduct statements until after the family dispute resolution hearing to allow potential settlement to be explored; It should be taken into account that conduct is one of the relevant considerations in determining whether proceedings should be transferred to the High Court, although conduct alone is unlikely to be sufficient to justify a transfer.

Further evidence of contact between senior figures at Vote Leave and BeLeave during the referendum came in a witness statement from Matthew Elliott, the campaign chief, which was submitted to the High Court on March 13, 2018 as part of a judicial review.