While it is true that a student does not lose his constitutional rights at the school house door or at the entrance to the college campus neither does he become cloaked with greater protection than any non-student who is the subject of a seizure of
evidence by a private citizen.
Not exact matches
In May 2012 it was reported that billionaire Robert Agostinelli had been targeted
by a
private detective named Steve Whitamore working for Rupert Murdoch's newspaper to gain confidential information pertaining to Agostinelli's business affairs — this
evidence brought to light the fact that high - profile U.S
citizens were targeted
by private investigators in the UK within Rupert Murdoch's empire.
The bottom line is that while there are myriad reasons to support or oppose
private school vouchers, the argument that one sector will generate
citizens better prepared to participate in our democracy is not supported
by the weight of the research
evidence.
If they don't like any of the particular options that fit the best available
evidence on sea level rise, or don't like the particular ones that they suspect a majority of their fellow
citizens might, they can be expected to try to stigmatize the municipal and various
private groups engaged in adaptation planning
by falsely characterizing them and their ideas in terms that bind them to only one of the partisan cultural styles that is now (sadly and pointlessly, as a result of misadventure, strategic behavior, and ineptitude) associated with engagement with climate change science in national politics.
This data may be subject to demands
by other
private citizens, and has been successfully subpoenaed as
evidence establishing the locations of alleged philanderers in divorce cases.
If letters and
private documents can thus be seized and held and used in
evidence against a
citizen accused of an offense, the protection of the Fourth Amendment declaring his right to be secure against such searches and seizures is of no value, and, so far as those thus placed are concerned, might as well be stricken from the Constitution... The tendency of those who execute the criminal laws of the country to obtain conviction
by means of unlawful seizures and enforced confessions, the latter often obtained after subjecting accused persons to unwarranted practices destructive of rights secured
by the Federal Constitution, should find no sanction in the judgments of the courts which are charged at all times with the support of the Constitution and to which people of all conditions have a right to appeal for the maintenance of such fundamental rights.