Sentences with phrase «evidence comes before the court»

In practice, if there is helpful evidence of the pre-contractual negotiations, a party will try to run applications for rectification and construction in tandem, (even if the rectification claim is tougher), to ensure that the evidence comes before the court.

Not exact matches

Attorneys for Waymo have said in court that over the nearly year - long case they have amassed a file of evidence against Uber and were ready to go to trial before the revelation of the Jacobs letter, which came days before the original trial date.

I would say in any and every situation until all facts come out, and all evidence is presented, that every man and woman should have his / her day in court before any judgement of them, their character or otherwise is rendered by anyone.

When it comes to corruption in Rockland — in particular, the Town of Ramapo — Zugibe told listeners the seizure of computers, files, taped recordings and other materials in 2013 amounted to more than a million pieces of evidence to be examined and catalogued before any conclusion could be reached — and one that would stand up in court.

But, as U.S. District Court Judge Valerie Caproni advised jurors before evidence about donations to Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo's campaign came up as an issue, there have been no suggestions that the money flow to Cuomo violated any state laws.

The issue of satellite imagery as evidence first came up before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1986 in a dispute between Mali and Burkina Faso [7].

It is common experience that it is advantageous to read all the available papers so as to gain an overview of the entire case rather than limit that task to the relatively small area that is truly relevant to the expert's own field for the expert evidence in a particular case must be given in relation to the whole case if the opinion is to be of real value to the court when it comes to decide on the issues before it.

In the recent English case of EXP v Barker [2015] EWHC 1289 (QB), expert evidence was nearly completely discounted because the expert witness did not state before the case came to court that he had previously worked with one the parties.

It appears that there are no reported cases involving challenges to the admissibility of such evidence, and this was the first time the question had come before the High Court.

A confession is the most powerful piece of evidence that can come before a court.

I had someone faced with this situation, (incorrect toll free number supplied by the Adjudicator) apply to Small Claims Court which he did, and the evidence presented was overwhelmingly on his side not the landlords, and the trial judge had to take time out to consult before he made his decision, and came back quite upset to report that there was NO APPEAL possible from a Residential Tenancy Act tribunal decision other than by launching a court action in BC Provincial CourCourt which he did, and the evidence presented was overwhelmingly on his side not the landlords, and the trial judge had to take time out to consult before he made his decision, and came back quite upset to report that there was NO APPEAL possible from a Residential Tenancy Act tribunal decision other than by launching a court action in BC Provincial Courcourt action in BC Provincial CourtCourt....

In every case there must come a time when the court feels that there is sufficient evidence before it upon which to make a finding.

Unlike the advisory - opinion matters that have come up before the Supreme Court, with their unlimited scope for interpretation of the terms of the Constitution and for the reconstruction of, and reflection upon legal principle — opportunities that provided scope for charting novel lines of jurisprudence — the Presidential - election case, though so vital in the progress of the new Constitution, and so momentous in political profile, was a matter the scope of which was well defined by elements of procedure, evidence and probability - evaluation.

(6) If a provisional order made under this section comes before a court in a reciprocating jurisdiction and confirmation is denied in respect of one or more persons for whom support is sought, the Ontario court that made the provisional order may, on motion within six months after the denial of confirmation, reopen the matter, receive further evidence and make a new provisional order for a person in respect of whom confirmation was denied.

(6) If a provisional variation order made under this section comes before a court in a reciprocating jurisdiction and confirmation is denied in respect of one or more persons for whom support is payable, the Ontario court that made the provisional variation order may, on motion within six months after the denial of confirmation, reopen the matter, receive further evidence and make a new provisional variation order for a person in respect of whom confirmation was denied.