Sentences with phrase «evidence during any proceedings»

An official police report will act as authoritative evidence during any proceedings.

She introduced evidence during the proceedings which she alleged supported her claims, arguing that the Trademarks had been generic from the time of their creation in 1916.

Not exact matches

During the court proceedings, Levandowski exercised his Fifth Amendment rights to avoid providing testimony or handing over evidence regarding his use of proprietary data from his time at Google.

Mr Ngole's barrister submitted evidence that the committee was chaired by a prominent and long - standing LGBT campaigner, Professor Jacqueline Marsh, and that both she and the university failed to disclose her interest in the issue at any point during the proceedings.

The Attorney General (Broadbent) must appoint a Special Advocate, Claudia Simmons - Howe (Hall), who has clearance to see the classified evidence and is tasked in representing Erdogan during the «closed» proceedings.

These proceedings present the evidence of rapid environmental change in the Arctic discussed during the 2003 SEARCH Open Science Meeting.

The proceedings and what evidence is allowed in your trial will be governed by the judge, and your criminal defense lawyer will be fighting continually for you during this highly technical and difficult time.

Trial: Your attorneys will attempt to prove to a judge or jury that the defendant is responsible for your injuries or other damages by using evidence collected during pretrial proceedings.

During discovery opposing parties request the production of relevant evidence and documents to encourage fair judicial proceedings and case settlements.

Next, Congress could also delay collateral attacks on the conviction by turning writs of Habeas Corpus proceedings into second trial by adding some clause that if the respondent to the writ does not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner committed the crime from the evidence heard during the proceeding, the writ shall be issued, which essentially means the defendant's original trial is invalidated.

As Articles 6 and 7 of the proposal preclude the use (and not merely the collection) in criminal proceedings of evidence obtained in breach of the right to silence and the privilege not to incriminate oneself, these provisions should also be complied with during administrative proceedings whenever the results of these proceedings can be used in subsequent criminal proceedings.

The General Court considered that the fame of Mr. Messi did not need to be further demonstrated by the applicant with documentary evidence — which had not been done in a timely fashion during the administrative phase of proceedings before the EUIPO — as — according to the General Court — Messi's name is so well known, that there is no need for further proof.

The Federal Circuit granted en banc review to consider whether that requirement was at odds with § 316 (e) and the AIA's requirement that petitioners bear the overall burden of proving unpatentability during IPR proceedings by a preponderance of the evidence:

Statements made during the course of court proceedings are subject to an absolute immunity and this immunity extends to a report which formed the basis of the witness» evidence.

The media are not banned, nor are publications of the proceedings prohibited or restricted, save and except for actual «in - camera» portions of evidence during the course of a proceeding.

He accepted the Council's evidence, some of which — unusually for judicial review proceedings — had been given during cross-examination, that none of its decisions had been taken for an improper political purpose.

However, the panel's decision as to whether the health care provider violated the standard of care may be admissible as evidence during any subsequent court proceedings.

In light of SAS, the PTAB may opt to expand the evidence considered during the trial proceedings, and to resolve patentability challenges to all claims identified in a petition, not simply those as to which a trial is instituted.

During their interview with the Citizen, the lawyers called for a high - level national debate over new media and its growing impact on Canadian court proceedings and spoke of how they deliberately put a protective «code of silence» on the Williams evidence — even within their own office — and how they agonized for days over the statement Edelson read in court at the end of the hearing.

At any time during the arbitral proceedings the arbitral tribunal may require the parties to produce documents, exhibits or other evidence within such a period of time as the arbitral tribunal shall determine.

The disciplinary panel noted that Mr. Groia had conceded during the trial that he had insufficient evidence to seek a stay of proceedings on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct, but he nevertheless «persisted in repeating [these allegations] ad nauseum»; this drew the panel to the conclusion that Mr. Groia's real intentions were to «disrupt the orderly proceeding of the trial» and «creat [e] the conditions for the trial to collapse under its own weight» (Ibid.).

In Sicurella, [1997] O.J. No. 4580, Justice Renaud has a discussion on scope of s. 13: Determination of whether a justice presiding at a preliminary inquiry could prevent the Crown from adducing certain evidence emanating from an accused during judicial interim release hearings given that section 13 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms provided that a witness who testified in any proceedings had the right not to have any incriminating evidence used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except for the giving of contradictory evidence.

In keeping with the underlying purposes of the doctrine, this extension will «promote -LSB--RSB- the public notice function of the intrinsic evidence and protect -LSB--RSB- the public's reliance on definitive statements made during» IPR proceedings.

In addition, although the Federal Circuit has not addressed the broader issue, patent owners should expect that short of actual disclaimer, all statements made during AIA post grant proceedings, including statements in expert reports, will be considered «intrinsic» evidence that a district court may consider, along with the patent specification and prosecution history, in conducting claim construction.

The lack of cross examination of Experts within adjudication, coupled with the potential for self - selection (and discarding) of relevant evidence can lead to the service of reports which do not, or which do not appear to, comply with the standards which would be expected during litigation proceedings.

Parties are prohibited from submitting documents obtained during the mediation process as evidence in subsequent proceedings should settlement fail.

However, one question remains unanswered: can a claimant rely on something said during the disciplinary proceedings as evidence rather than as the basis for a claim?

However, rules on evidence in civil proceedings set forth deadlines by which documents and information need to be produced or alleged, and this may make it difficult to use information and documents that emerged at the end of the investigations in the context of civil proceedings started during the same investigations.

Specifically, the Judge stated that the jury would be instructed about the data loss and that the lost data affirmatively would have provided information relevant to the claims and defenses; defendant would be precluded from offering certain evidence in support of its defense; plaintiff would be able to re-depose, at defendant's cost, defendant's key witnesses about belatedly produced «substitute» data; and defendant would be responsible for 75 % of the Special Master's fees and costs and 50 % of plaintiff's attorneys» fees incurred during the Special Master proceedings.

Weighing these factors and presenting compelling evidence during court proceedings or settlement negotiations is an important part of a Pennsylvania divorce proceeding.

Information can subsequently be used as evidence against the company showing its hand, while it can also become public during court proceedings and then published by the media if there is no restriction in place.

● in an unusual case and the first of its kind, an individual was found to be in contempt of court as a result of false statements which she had made during the course of personal injury proceedings which had been compromised after the disclosure of surveillance evidence.

Take photographs of an accident scene to secure evidence which can be presented during court proceedings

Insurance fraud investigators may also visit scenes of accidents to acquire photographic evidence that can be presented during court proceedings.

Insurance fraud investigators usually testify in court during a hearing, they also present evidence during court proceedings.

In addition to providing standard clerical, secretarial and administrative support, I have been highly involved in providing core assistance during court room proceedings by recording minutes, calling witnesses, marking evidence exhibits and swearing in jurors.

• Proficient in assisting during courtroom proceedings, including recording minutes, marking evidences, calling witnesses, and swearing in jurors

(2) If, during the proceedings, the court considers, from the evidence in the proceedings or the attitude of the parties to the marriage, that there is a reasonable possibility of a reconciliation between the parties, the court may adjourn the proceedings to give the parties the opportunity to consider a reconciliation.