Sentences with phrase «evidence for»

Geez, spin it how you wish if It helps you feel like the bigger person (more like an arrogant ass)... what makes you so right and everyone so wrong??? Where is your evidence for this god and don't use the bible - it doesn't prove a god, it merely proves that man has a vivid imagination?

and I took the liberty of chiming in because if a claim has consequences for anyone beside the claimant those other people have the right to examine the claim and demand evidence for its truthfullness.

So you're saying that God planted a complete world of evidence for evolution, and zero for Creationism?

There isn't any evidence for any afterlife at all.

You aren't in charge of what is and what isn't compelling evidence for anyone else but yourself, as far as I can tell.

Without any evidence for this claim must be rejected and theists have not one shred of evidence, despite their insistence to the contrary.

How's that evidence for your particular sky fairy story coming along, Robert?

It should be noted that if you make an positive affirmation, i.e «God exists,» you must provide testable evidence for it.

This charge is simply not true, as there is both philological and archaeological evidence for knowledge and use of this animal in the early second millennium BC and even earlier.

Just like there is no evidence for any of the miracles, talking snakes, or a man living inside a fish.

You know, it's absolutely dishonest that he would use evidence for the big bang to disprove God in the first place: the implications are so theistic that you've got today's brightest atheists positing magical multiverses that are completely and ironically empirically undetectable so that they can elude the big bang implications.

You do know that there is no evidence for any god, don't you?

And more importantly, there's zero evidence for a god.»

Err, no, we can not provide a definitive list — we're still trying to find the evidence for a god — we can't ever seem to find it when we really need it...

To say that «for every bit of scientific evidence for evolution there is scientific evidence against it.

That's the funny thing about faith - there's no evidence for anything you believe in.

«A few hundred years ago, there was no evidence for atoms or molecules, and so it goes.

There are mountains of evidence for the systematic slaughter of Jews and others during WWII, by nominal Christians, by the way.

There is certainly evidence for this assertion.

You got any evidence for this claim?

I do get a great big laugh out of people who absolutely refuse to provide the slightest evidence for their basic position, then hypocritically demand everyone else provide evidence.

@ Chuckles «There is as much evidence for the events portrayed in the Odyssey being true as the events in the Bible» [paraphrase mine]

There is equal evidence for the possibility that when you die, Osiris will weigh your heart against Ma'at's feather to determine what will happen to you in your afterlife.

Because we have actual evidence for the Holocaust, not manufactured history at the hands of Christian writers like Eusebius.

I too am a teacher and see no evidence for evolution as to the answer for the origin of man.

You said, «Your problem LinCA, is that you're «all over the map» trying to rationalize your baseless beliefs...» What part of «if there isn't any evidence for a phenomenon, there is no reason to believe it», is «all over the map» or a «baseless belief»?

'' — the Bible makes the claims and therefore can not reasonably also be used as evidence for those claims.»

My argument is that without evidence for your god, your entire story is bunk.

Further evidence for this hope is that Mormon participants in the Evangelical - Mormon dialogue which Mouw and Mormon theologian Robert Millet have led for fifteen years tell Mouw that the Snow couplet has no canonical status in Mormon theology.

The evidence for early Christian persecution is direct and far more credible than many other well known historical events, yet we appear to have deniers in our midst.

FAIL» = > wrong, DNA is astonishing evidence FOR God, He created the complex, efficient «information system» which encodes life.

There is evidence for the existence of the Loch Ness Monster and the Abominable Snowman.

Please provide factual, verifiable, independent and objective evidence for your god, retract your assertion or admit you are delusional (mentally ill) and / or a liar.

There is not a single shred of evidence for the Exodus, or it's Moses character.

Have you looked critically at what you consider evidence for your god?

Without any evidence for, or even so much as a rational argument in support of your god, or any other god for that matter, believing they exist is patently moronic.

there is a MOUNTAIN of evidence, hard proof, for evolution - there is ZERO evidence for god.

Where's the independent, factual, objective and verifiable evidence for the claimed extraordinary events at the time of the alleged crucifixion and resurrection of some dude allegedly named jesus?

The author IS CHRISTIAN, and we have actual evidence for the Holocaust... Christian martyrs... not so much.

There is plenty of evidence for evolution (althought we didn't come «from apes,» but from a common ancestor with apes) and literally no evidence that we were created as is by a deity.

That there is no evidence for the supernatural claims of any religion?

Instead, the evidence for Jesus» life must be examined on its own historical merits.

Or the guy peddling, GOD IS MAGIC AND INVISIBLE he promises a magic afterlife, btw everything I have said there isn't a shred of evidence for!

In fact, there is nothing special about christianity — it is just one of many cults that claim to have all the answers, none of which provide any real evidence for any of their supernatural claims.

As for not «seeing» evidence for evolution or the Big Bang, both of those scientific theories have been tested, and ample evidence has been found to support them.

In regard to evolution, the evidence for evolution is now overwhelming.

There is no good evidence for it appearing before fairly modern times.

I believe one of the more overwhelming testimonies regarding the depth of archeological evidence for the New Testament is in the account of the famous historian and archeologist Sir William Ramsay.

There are still no reliable evidence for ressurection of dead people.

They may, but until there is some evidence for your god, they are wrong.