Sentences with phrase «evidence for both arguments»

Then, to claim that the bible wrote that too as evidence for your argument?

yeah, lol, that is, IF faith's relentless calling people stupid and not providing any evidence for her arguments is what you mean by «destroying the feeble - minded»; lol

And they have really good evidence for their argument.

The evidence for this argument [38] can be found in Cull of the Wild: A Contemporary Analysis of Wildlife Trapping in the United States [39](hereafter COTW) and Facts about Furs [40](hereafter, FAF).

There is very little evidence for both arguments which makes judging the coach an incredibly difficult task.

Neither side provides evidence for their argument.

The recently published Future of England Survey 2014 provides evidence for this argument with its conclusion that people in England see a «democratic deficit» in the way they are governed («devo - anxiety»), and that one dimension of that deficit is a desire for civic engagement.

Their findings provide more evidence for the argument that gender differences aren't brain differences but the result of variations in the ways boys and girls are treated.

Country Comparisons in Current Events Class Do you have middle or high school students who are eager to debate current events, but sometimes lack evidence for their arguments?

A study from North Carolina provides some evidence for this argument, showing that teachers trained elsewhere were less effective than teachers trained in - state, though the difference was very small.

In history, on the other hand, students are frequently expected to evaluate the plausibility of an interpretation of past events and to refer to documentary sources as evidence for their argument.

Present the main argument of your management research paper at the very beginning of your writing, give evidence for your argument with the help of authoritative sources, however, do not forget to make references to the quotes you are using in your management research paper in order not to be blamed in plagiarism.

Not exact matches

In section one, «The Wakeup Call,» Huffington lays out the arguments for why we need sleep, pulling in evidence from history, religion, science, and economics.

Much of the technical evidence in the case has been filed under seal, making it impossible for outside observers to independently assess the strength of each side's arguments.

The judge said the Interior Department's argument for suspending the rule was «untethered to evidence.»

The larger issue for Uber is that this could give credence to Waymo's argument that members of the jury be notified that Uber destroyed or did not disclose relevant evidence as the company was required to by the court.

«The US government acted as police force (identifying the foreign government's crime), prosecutor (making the legal arguments), jury (ruling on the evidence), and judge (sentencing the foreigner to US retaliatory punishment),» Chad Bown, a senior fellow at the pro-free trade Peterson Institute for International Economics, wrote in a memo about Section 301's history earlier in August.

McKay cites his own recent three - part investigative series for The Energy Mix as «an evidence - based argument that there is no credible business case to support an expansion of oil sand exports or the proposed Trans Mountain and Keystone XL pipelines.

Evidence in support of this argument arrived in March as Amazon introduced the Alexa Skills Kit for France.

General District Judge Dean Worcester said the legal standard for establishing probable cause to send the case to a grand jury is low, and that arguments about planted evidence are better suited for trial.

No evidence or argument for anything...» I gave you the «how» God works in the salvation of people.

But if you are looking for consilience, in which multiple lines of independent evidence converge on the same target, then Schwartz's argument is a good one to have in your arsenal, for it fits nicely with biological arguments for intelligent design (cf. Michael Behe's Darwin's Black Box), recent philosophical work on mental causation (cf. Robert Koons» Realism Regained), cosmological fine - tuning (cf. John Barrow and Frank Tipler's The Anthropic Cosmological Principle), and consciousness studies (cf. Dean Radin's The Conscious Universe).

Without any evidence for, or even so much as a rational argument in support of your god, or any other god for that matter, believing they exist is patently moronic.

My argument is that without evidence for your god, your entire story is bunk.

You said, «To discount The Bible as merely a «fairy tale», or deny the life of Jesus just doesn't cut it without ANY counter-evidence, so you make the convenient argument for yourself that there is no evidence to counter.

uyour argument has no merit NO evidence whatsoever for macro evolution.

In fact one of my strongest arguments for atheism is that I can find no evidence of god.

Philosophers themselves distinguish between a defense of the existence of God (for instance) and an argument for the existence of God: While the latter actually sets out to prove that God exists, the former lays out evidence which fits the picture of a God - created universe.

He called the arguments for a «strong natural disposition to believe in gods...» a «mounting body of scientific evidence.»

This line of apologist argument is at best a draw, but perhaps doesn't even rise to that level because at least we have physical evidence for the singularity.

The evidence for it is less clearly found in Process and Reality than in Religion in the Making, yet it seems to be present in the philosophy of Whitehead in such a way that this third argument is really more fundamental than the two just summarized.

If those who have most deeply entered into the contemporary situation find what is said dull or vacuous, it is not saved by the amount of evidence amassed for its conclusions or the tightness of its logical arguments.

But this argument based on historical evidence is inconclusive because for every good deed or accomplishment, we could put alongside it an evil deed.

Despite the pro-life movement's best efforts, the evidence does not indicate this capacity for fetuses prior to ~ 22 - 24 wks, and there is no argument that an embryo is incapable of experience suffering as we understand it.

With the empirical evidence of the universe evolving, it is possible to accept the Thomistic argument from finitude and contingency as recast in evolutionary categories.5 Without the evolutionary category of birth, it would be impossible for us to argue that the universe had a Creator - Ground, for we would have to imagine process as a horizontal straight line that extends in either direction indefinitely and infinitely.

Chesterton's Autobiography is not always a reliable source; but there is corroborating evidence for these protective feelings from his childhood onwards: and since this evidence is virtually unknown, it is probably best here to take this opportunity to publish it for the first time (much of it will appear in my forthcoming book Chesterton and the Romance of Orthodoxy, though I discovered some of it too late for it to be included) rather than repeat old arguments.

Having once been an agnostic, I know most of the arguments unbelievers use, I use most of them myself... I also know for a fact that you can not argue someone into a belief in God, they have to get their on their own, with the evidence presented for Him...

He shows the full evidence and argument for the Greek text he establishes, and provides an original translation.

This outlook has represented a prominent strand in theology from the Hellenistic influence apparent in Hebrews 11:6 («Whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him»), through the medieval Anselmic and Thomistic arguments for the existence of God, reaching a climax in the 18th century deistic arguments for a Great Designer evidenced by the intricacy and harmony of the universe.

To arrive at the God of Christian Theism, other evidences can be offered in addition to this more basic one (e.g. aspects of natural theology, historical arguments for the life, death, and resurrection of Christ, alleged special revelation, etc.).

Whenever pluralism in theology resists the need for argument, warrants, theory, evidence, praxis, it becomes a kind of Will Rogers pluralism: one where theologians have never met a position they didn't like.

A lot of text offering no positive evidence for an alternative, just one painfully long disjointed argument of incredulity based in arguments of general (and clearly personal) ignorance...

Your argument is one religions feed their believers so they won't ask for evidence everyone knows doesn't exist.

Only if everyone agreed that biblical prophecies have come true, when this be good evidence to use in your argument for the divinity of Jesus.

-- the theists have not provided a coherent argument or evidence for the existance of god, other than «wishful thinking»

provided the slightest argument for god, never mind objective factual evidence.

Sure... 1) Evidence for the existence of God can be found in the Law of Causality applied to the Argument from Contingency.

Note that the «evidence» for creationism is almost invariably negative, i.e. arguments of incredulity targeting evolution.

I'm showing as Alias does and as C.S. Lewis taught us in the 1930's that people who pine for a «perfectly just world» as evidence for God, ala DD, have a flawed argument.

If one destroyed the Genesis story of creation and substituted the gradual emergence of different forms as they struggled for survival in their environment, then one destroyed the entire argument for the proof of God from the evidence of creation.