Sentences with phrase «evidence for global»

As a result, the principal evidence for global warming stands less certain and unaccountable.

The real fantasists here are those like CJ who imagine that they can stand judgment on 200 years of cumulative scientific knowledge, by rubbishing all those men and women who have established the understanding we now have, including the scientific evidence for global warming resulting from human activities that is now incontrovertible.

It could be considered the most important evidence for global warming.

As most don't have the time to scour through the peer - reviewed scientific literature, the multiple lines of independent evidence for global warming are given here.

As scientists have accumulated evidence for global warming and its possible consequences, so the scientific and political consensus has favoured attempts at reducing carbon emissions through taxes and regulations and subsidies, many of them directed at factories and motor - cars.

When done so, proxy records and climate models indicate that the response to past global warming was profound, with evidence for global reorganisation of the hydrological cycle and profound local increases and decreases in rainfall; combined with elevated temperatures and terrestrial vegetation change, this appears to often result in warming - enhanced soil organic matter oxidation, chemical weathering and nutrient cycling.

Southern hemisphere observations of a long - term decrease in F region altitude and thermospheric wind providing possible evidence for global thermospheric cooling

To show the imbalance, as one reads in the popular press, we have created a companion site that presents the evidence for global cooling, just as most newspapers and alarmists present only the science that supports warming.

The new research supports the idea that the vast majority of the world's active climate scientists accept the evidence for global warming as well as the case that human activities are the principal cause of it.

A new Pew Research poll shows that fewer US residents think there's solid evidence for global warming than in previous years, with just 57 % seeing climate change evidence.

Thus, by 2001, there was no evidence for a global warming influcence on hurricanes.

Does that mean, since I see evidence for a global warming in the last 100 years and also an anthropogenic influence, that I am in the «apocalyptic half» of this study, beside the fact, that I am indeed very skeptical of the predictions for our future as given in the IPCC - reports?

Reblogged this on thenoblegasbag and commented: A nice explanation of why there is no evidence for a global warming pause

I can tell you that the evidence for global warming is far weaker than its proponents would ever admit.»

EIR 2014 - 24122 is a reply from the DECC Climate Science team for a request about the evidence for global warming.

Thickening ice in Antarctica has been predicted by climate scientists for a long time, as a consequence of the greater moisture - carrying capacity of warmer air, so evidence for a thickening ice sheet would actually support, not negate, other evidence for global warming.

Politically conservative educators who reject evidence for global warming are increasingly seeking out supplemental materials that present the skeptical view, said Mark McCaffrey, programs and policy director for the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), a science advocacy group.

That said, the safest route between two scientific points is not the mushy middle, «well, the critics raise some good points too, so I'll compromise by saying that the scientific body of evidence for global warming is probably exaggerated».

The evidence for global warming due to human influence has been recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized countries.

«The thermometer - based global surface temperature time series (GST) commands a prominent role in the evidence for global warming, yet this record has considerable uncertainty.

Organized in four sections, the book first lays out the evidence for global warming in two - page verbal and visual snapshots of a single topic — whether birds, butterflies, tree rings, or ice cores.

Though the book covers much of the same ground, albeit at a lower reading level, as Al Gore's famous global warming presentation, it is never alarmist, and instead focuses on the grounded evidence for global climate change and the collective efforts of many different kinds of scientists.

Temperature Rising: Articles in this series are focusing on the central arguments in the climate debate and examining the evidence for global warming and its consequences.

The conclusion of the late climate scientist Roger Revelle — Al Gore's supposed mentor — is worth pondering: the evidence for global warming thus far doesn't warrant any action unless it is justifiable on grounds that have nothing to do with climate.»

I personally consider this a criminal act of tampering with evidence for global warming.

Dr Meier:» The significant changes in the Arctic are key pieces of evidence for global warming, but the observations from Arctic are complemented by evidence from around the world.»

The significant changes in the Arctic are key pieces of evidence for global warming, but the observations from Arctic are complemented by evidence from around the world.

With the evidence for global warming so strong, why, Powell asks, does half the American public doubt it?

Yet, as Festinger would have predicted, instead of falling silent, perhaps even admitting error, the denialists have become more vehement in their attacks on climate scientists, environmentalists and anyone who accepts the evidence for global warming.

We shouldn't look at them as evidence for global warming, but as examples of what is to come.

Prominent was a press release reaffirming that the evidence for global warming was «incontrovertible».

Lots of interesting finds to be had in AR5 — I just came across this in the introduction: «there is no evidence for global - scale tipping points in any of the most comprehensive models evaluated to date.»

«I was irked by the persistent use of wishy - washy terminology such as «likely» and «very likely» that was totally uncalled for... Such «social sciences» terminology might be allowable if there was no other available evidence for global warming except for the statistical analysis of a relatively short global temperature time - series (on which there is superimposed a substantial natural variability component).

The industry of climate science denial is succeeding: public acceptance has declined even as the scientific evidence for global warming has increased.

while there is undoubtedly scope for statisticians to play a larger role in paleoclimate research, the large investment of time needed to become familiar with the scientific background is likely to deter most statisticians from entering this field... In the end, it's important not to lose sight of the forest for the trees, where the «forest» refers to the totality of scientific evidence for global warming.

There's no evidence for a global, synchronous MWP.

You seem to be leaving out the ocean temperature data, as additional evidence for global warming independent of the urban heating effect: http://www.john-daly.com/mobydick/oceans.htm

There is no evidence for a global, synchronous LIA.

There is LOTS of evidence for a global MWP (studies from all over the globe using different paleo methodologies, composite studies from several sites, historical records from all over the civilized world at the time, actual physical evidence, etc..)

(Those who count the Arctic warmth as evidence for global warming should count the Eurasian code [cold] as evidence for global cooling.)

Guest essay by Douglas J. Keenan Temperatures on Earth's surface — i.e. where people live — are widely believed to provide evidence for global warming.

«Those who count the Arctic warmth as evidence for global warming should count the Eurasian [cold] as evidence for global cooling»

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

``... there is no evidence for global - scale tipping points in any of the most com ¬ prehensive models evaluated to date in studies of climate evolution in the 21st century.

To be honest, the evidence for global warming is so blatantly obviously everywhere, so incredibly pervasive that it becomes hard for anyone with a scientific mind to treat those that can't see the obviousness with dislike.

Are you implying that people that know about the evidence for global warming are not trying to reduce their footprint, thus they don't «really» believe in the evidence?

The late John Daly showed that there was no evidence for any global warming at over 200 rural and remote weather stations upto ca. 2001.

I'll also report on new results of our «Berkeley Earth» project — a detailed re-analysis of the evidence for global warming; see http://www.BerkeleyEarth.org."

At this stage, you are probably thinking ``... but, it's not just the weather record analysis — there's loads of other evidence for global warming — the Arctic sea ice is melting, the oceans are heating up, sea levels are rising, etc.» You're right — there is plenty of evidence that there has been some global warming in recent decades.

Beginning in the 1990s, particularly in 1997, when the Kyoto Protocol calling for reduced CO2 emissions was established, conservative commentators such as Rush Limbaugh began to critique both the evidence for global warming and proposals for reducing carbon emissions.