Do you still think that MBH98 / 99 «hockey stick» graph and the «spaghetti graphs» in TAR and AR4 were «fraudulent», despite complete lack
of evidence for the assertions underlying the claim?
This is best handled by a direct and public confrontation, for which the alarmists are ill prepared since they have no real
scientific evidence for their assertions despite a muddy ocean of words by the UN and USEPA.
This is hardly a ringing endorsement of the contrarians, since it implicitly suggests that even Stringer recognizes that they have not presented anything close to
compelling evidence for their assertions.
He does not spend much time marshalling
further evidence for his assertion that failure is optional: it's clear that Schuller, the author of Move Ahead with Possibility Thinking and Tough Times Never Last, but Tough People Do!
If you want to express an opinion that would not immediately be viewed by everybody reading it as completely worthless, you could try to defend your position by providing links to credible sources that support the argument that the scientific journal you disparage is in fact a «joke», by providing lines
of evidence for your assertion.
There is
evidence for the assertion that the universe is all physical though, the complete lack of objective evidence for anything other than a physical universe.
The evidence for this assertion is scattered throughout the Wesley corpus but is best summed up in his sermon on «Catholic Spirit» and in his open «Letter to a Roman Catholic.»
Although
the evidence for these assertions were based on solid data, many people really, really wanted it not to be true.
No, atheists are not claiming to be right, but are instead withholding belief until you, or someone from another faith, offer
some evidence for your assertion that a particular god does exist.
«15
His evidence for this assertion is the passage quoted above and a passage, partially quoted here: «His purpose is always embodied in the particular ideals relevant to the actual state of the world.
The civil servants undertook their own research and were not persuaded that there was
evidence for this assertion.
If you have that source, that data, that
evidence for your assertion that she died as a result of a «hospital birth», I would be most grateful if you would share it with us.
«We were surprised and perplexed,» De Cock says, adding that «
no evidence for the assertions being made was presented.»
In particular, it will be more careful about ensuring that it lays out
the evidence for any assertion it makes about the likelihood of any effect of climate change, said Chris Field, a U.S. scientist and a leader of the panel's 2014 report.
The evidence for this assertion is, to be generous, lacking.
You should present
the evidence for your assertion either through inductive or deductive reasons.