By 1979,
the evidence human carbon dioxide emissions were serious threat was strong enough that the National Academy of Sciences published Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment, with this statement, «A wait and see policy may mean waiting until it is too late.»
Not exact matches
HERE is a line of empirical
evidence: (
human / industry CO2
emissions are causing global warming) * Climate Myth The Skeptic - Denier position: There's no empirical
evidence «There is no actual
evidence that
carbon dioxide emissions are causing global warming.
It examines the
evidence (climate change research) and decides whether or not
human - produced
carbon dioxide emissions are interfering in a dangerous way with normal background climate.
The claim is often made that climate realists (a.k.a. skeptics) can not point to peer - reviewed papers to support their position that there is no
evidence of «dangerous global warming:» caused by
human emissions of so - called «greenhouse» gases, including
carbon dioxide.
The new target: Naomi Oreskes who last week found her research used as a foil by some lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives to try and discredit the widely - accepted and growing view that there is a broad scientific consensus on the
evidence of
human - caused global warming caused by rising
carbon dioxide emissions.
This position does not appear to be supported by any observational
evidence, much like the highly exaggerated claims concerning the effects of
human carbon dioxide emissions on climate.
The main
evidence for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW), the principal alleged adverse effect of
human emissions of
carbon dioxide (CO2), is climate models built by CAGW supporters in a field where models with real predictive power do not exist and can not be built with any demonstrable accuracy beyond a week or two because climate and weather are coupled non-linear chaotic systems.
Curry also notes there's
evidence the Earth has been warming for the past 200 years — a period that began before
human carbon dioxide emissions would have been a factor.
The 2010 drought is still under study; some
evidence suggests that the 2005 drought was linked to high Atlantic Ocean temperatures that may in turn be linked to
human emissions of
carbon dioxide.
The main
evidence for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW), the principal alleged adverse effect of
human emissions of
carbon dioxide (CO2), is climate models built -LSB-...]
«There is no
evidence, neither empirical nor theoretical, that
carbon dioxide emissions from industrial and other
human activities can have any effect on global climate.
«We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific
evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that
human emissions of
carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming.»