Sentences with phrase «evidence humans caused warming»

Not exact matches

Decades of scientific investigation across multiple lines of evidence corroborate a powerful yet inconvenient truth: Human - caused global warming and climate change is real, and it's briskly accelerating as we dump more carbon into the atmosphere.

Hacked e-mails from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at England's University of East Anglia (UEA) showed that CRU researchers were defending the thesis that humans are causing global warming by suppressing contrary evidence... Continue Reading

(No errors have been found in the first, and most often quoted, report, which says that the evidence is incontrovertible that human activity is causing the atmosphere to warm and the seas to rise.)

Scientists say there is strong evidence that human - caused global warming has altered the strength and path of the powerful winds.

ASU's longtime climate skeptic Robert C. Balling continues to reject conclusive scientific evidence that humans are the primary cause of global warming and was listed as a recipient of prospective payments in Heartland's leaked budget for work on their «Climate Change Reconsidered» reports.

The Climategate controversy hasn't even touched upon the empirical evidence indicating that human activity is the cause of recent warming:

The assessment examines the following content; global warming, the greenhouse effect / gases, natural and human causes of past climate change, evidence of the little ice age, features of tropical storms and the effects and response to tropical storms.

I call it reasonable cognition of quantifiable and qualifiable evidence in relation to the problem of human - caused global warming.

Merely showing anecdotal evidence of AGW (melting glaciers, hot summers, warm winters, etc.) does not prove that warming is caused by human emitted CO2.

re: 9,» Merely showing anecdotal evidence of AGW (melting glaciers, hot summers, warm winters, etc.) does not prove that warming is caused by human emitted CO2.»

The hockey stick provides compelling evidence for the emergence of a human - caused warming signal from the background noise of natural fluctuations in climate.

The latest evidence is on display over at Realclimate.org, the blog on climate run by a loose network of climate scientists who are part of the broad consensus that human - caused warming poses unacceptable risks.

But as a starting point, I'll propose now — and I'll change this if they disagree — the names of some leading scientists in this field who would NOT say there is sufficient evidence to conclude that human - caused global warming IS the main cause of increasing summer retreats of sea ice (although they would say there is strong likelihood that it will eventually dominate):

fwiw I think Stefan's excellent article can be summarised in one of his sentences: «The evidence for the human cause of global warming is overwhelming.»

I know from the careful wording of his speeches that Inhofe is mainly rejecting evidence pointing to «catastrophic» human - caused warming, but I don't see him being quick to point out that he doesn't dispute the basic reality that greenhouse gases keep Earth warm and more will make things warmer.

The evidence for the human cause of global warming is overwhelming.

He also happens to be right that our nation's top scientists say that evidence for human - caused global warming is «unequivocal», and that approving this pipeline will both symbolically and literally tether our fate to a fossil fuel - dependent economy for the foreseeable future.

That bold statement may seem like hyperbole, but there is now a very clear pattern in the scientific evidence documenting that the earth is warming, that warming is due largely to human activity, that warming is causing important changes in climate, and that rapid and potentially catastrophic changes in the near future are very possible.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (big pdf file) and other climate - research groups have largely rejected the hypothesis that variations in the sun's behavior could have played a big role in warming since 1950 (the period in which the panel and the vast majority of climate specialists see abundant evidence that a human - caused buildup of greenhouse gases is the main influence).

It initially found no conclusive evidence that humans were causing global warming.

Nope, no empirical evidence there that empirically shows that the late 20th century warming was human - caused.

We found that scientific agreement strengthened as more evidence for human - caused global warming accumulated.

Unlike these climate scientists, who have solid evidence that humans are not causing the majority of warming and / or the warming is not dangerous, Galileo and his fellow helieocentrists did not have a shred of evidence to back up the claim.

The evidence is crystal clear that humans are the main cause of the current global warming, and the expert consensus reflects the strength of that body of evidence.

(infamous DENIER David Evans) * The line of Empirical Evidence (peer reviewed, published, replicated) that humans are causing global warming is as follows:.

HERE is a line of empirical evidence: (human / industry CO2 emissions are causing global warming) * Climate Myth The Skeptic - Denier position: There's no empirical evidence «There is no actual evidence that carbon dioxide emissions are causing global warming.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) failed to prove human CO2 is causing global warming as evidenced by their incorrect projections.

In particular, the authors find fault with IPCC's conclusions relating to human activities being the primary cause of recent global warming, claiming, contrary to significant evidence that they tend to ignore, that the comparatively small influences of natural changes in solar radiation are dominating the influences of the much larger effects of changes in the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations on the global energy balance.

You just posted propaganda screeds that provided zero empirical evidence of human - caused climate warming.

And that reality has been demonstrated over and over again, most recently in the work of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project, led by Dr. Richard Muller, who began his comprehensive assessment as an avowed climate skeptic and ended it convinced by the clear evidence that global warming is happening and is caused by human activity.This conclusion is emphatically shared by the best and brightest of the global scientific community, including our own National Academy of Sciences.

John Cook's study finds that in 1998 there were just three peer reviewed science papers rejecting the evidence that humans were the main cause of global warming.

Thanks to a growing body of scientific evidence and improved computer models that can project climate changes more accurately and in much finer detail, each report has proclaimed with greater and greater certainty that human activity is the main cause of global warming.

«There is no convincing scientific evidence that human contribution to greenhouse gases is causing dangerous global warming,» it stated in an official declaration in 2009.

It was achieved, and became a pivotal part of the evidence of human - caused global warming in the 2001 IPCC Report.

It's also now becoming widely recognized that there is no incontrovertible evidence that global warming is caused by human activity, and that there is quite a bit of evidence that human activity is not a primary cause of such warming.

This analysis shows that in fact, in 2008 when Heartland began its conferences, hardly any scientists in the peer - reviewed literature were rejecting the evidence that humans were causing global warming.

The evidence I've seen has not convinced me that the cause of this global warming or an appreciable contribution [to it] is human activity.

Since at least 1995, the balance of evidence in climate science has indicated that human - caused greenhouse - gas emissions are behind the planet's warming.

This is the belief backed up by the scientific evidence; in the most recent report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in September 2013, scientists agreed that it is «extremely likely» that human emissions of greenhouse gases are causing the planet to warm.

To my mind the possibility, which certainly has a great deal of at least circumstantial evidence behind it, that humans are causing global warming is enough to suggest that we should cease the behaviors that have the potential of destroying our planet.

While recent headlines about the woes of U.N. - led efforts to assemble a comprehensive picture of the science have caused gleeful headlines on The Drudge Report and other skeptical media outlets, the vast weight of the evidence — from melting glaciers to warming oceans to satellite temperature readings, and much more — still points to a changing climate caused by human activity.

Many independent lines of evidence demonstrate that the world is warming and that human activity is the primary cause.

«I showed some evidence that humans are causing warming in the surface measurements that we have, but it is not the greenhouse relation,» Christy said.

There is little evidence that global warming is necessarily bad for the world or humans, and especially there is little evidence that it will cause a militarily more dangerous or less stable world, or cause more work or misery for the US Army.

Tweet There is no scientific evidence that human activity is causing the planet to warm, according to Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore, who testified in front of a Senate committee on Tuesday.

According to the report, the «evidence for human influence has grown since AR4» and «it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century,» with extremely likely referring to a 95 — 100 % probability.

Stern, The Economics of Climate Change, 4 — 5, 11 — 16, 95, 193, 220 — 34, 637, 649 — 51; «Evidence of Human - Caused Global Warming is Now «Unequivocal,»» Science Daily, http://www.sciencedaily.com; Browne, «The Ethics of Climate Change,» 100; Spratt and Sutton, Climate Code Red, 30; Editors, «Climate Fatigue,» Scientific American 298, no. 6 (June 2008): 39; Ted Trainer, «A Short Critique of the Stern Review,» Real - World Economics Review, 45 (2008), http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue45/Trainer45.pdf, 54 — 58.

New, convincing evidence indicates global warming is caused by cosmic rays and the sun — not humans.

The few remaining legitimate sceptics, along with some of the smarter ideological contrarians, have looked at the evidence and conceded the reality of human - caused global warming.

In our view, the fact that so many scientists agree so closely about the [causes of the] earth's warming is, itself, evidence of a lack of evidence for [human caused] global warming.