Parties are prohibited from submitting documents obtained during the mediation process as
evidence in subsequent proceedings should settlement fail.
(1996) 23 EHRR 313, an exception was created by the Companies Act 1985 where Department of Trade and Industry inspectors could compel a person to answer questions, and s 434 (5) established that the answers obtained could be used in
evidence in any subsequent proceedings.
Not exact matches
If they are stripped of their right to silence by statutory compulsion, their answers can not be used against them
in subsequent criminal
proceedings and «exclusion of the
evidence is compulsory».
As Articles 6 and 7 of the proposal preclude the use (and not merely the collection)
in criminal
proceedings of
evidence obtained
in breach of the right to silence and the privilege not to incriminate oneself, these provisions should also be complied with during administrative
proceedings whenever the results of these
proceedings can be used
in subsequent criminal
proceedings.
While being interviewed voluntarily may seem attractive
in that it suggests a co-operative attitude toward law enforcement, the record of the voluntary interview (including any admissions made by the witness) could be used
in evidence against the witness
in subsequent legal
proceedings.
The significance of these interviews is that the replies may be used as
evidence in any
subsequent Court
proceedings.
Those discussions will not be used
in evidence in any
subsequent employment tribunal
proceedings for unfair dismissal.
These discussions are then inadmissible as
evidence in any
subsequent employment tribunal
proceedings for unfair dismissal.
Where criminal
proceedings follow civil
proceedings, ordinarily findings of a civil court on the matters
in issue
in the criminal case will not be admissible
in those
subsequent criminal
proceedings, although
in some circumstances civil judgments may be admissible pursuant to the rules concerning
evidence of bad character.
In any subsequent civil proceedings, the fact of a conviction will be admissible in evidence for the purpose of proving, where relevant, that the convicted person committed the offence, and the information, complaint, indictment or charge - sheet on which the person in question was convicted are admissible for the purpose of identifying the facts on which the conviction is base
In any
subsequent civil
proceedings, the fact of a conviction will be admissible
in evidence for the purpose of proving, where relevant, that the convicted person committed the offence, and the information, complaint, indictment or charge - sheet on which the person in question was convicted are admissible for the purpose of identifying the facts on which the conviction is base
in evidence for the purpose of proving, where relevant, that the convicted person committed the offence, and the information, complaint, indictment or charge - sheet on which the person
in question was convicted are admissible for the purpose of identifying the facts on which the conviction is base
in question was convicted are admissible for the purpose of identifying the facts on which the conviction is based.
In particular, the applicant is not required to provide evidence of the type which, if furnished in subsequent proceedings, would be required to prove all matters needed to make out the clai
In particular, the applicant is not required to provide
evidence of the type which, if furnished
in subsequent proceedings, would be required to prove all matters needed to make out the clai
in subsequent proceedings, would be required to prove all matters needed to make out the claim.
At times, witnesses may be concerned that their
evidence at a the Council hearing could be used against them
in subsequent criminal or civil
proceedings.