«Well, we have no burden of proof and we think the fact they didn't call key people in this case is a reflection of the lack of
evidence in this case which is.
Not exact matches
There's the third, more realistic action,
which is you have to get some sort of production order of the data at Uber as
evidence in a court
case.
The other phones,
which were seized
in a variety of criminal investigations, are involved
in cases where prosecutors are compelling the company to help them bypass the passcode security feature of phones that may hold
evidence, the Journal added.
For instance, we were once
in a proceeding
in which the judge made a ruling on
evidence presented at trial by opposing counsel that was going to fundamentally change the outcome of the
case.
In this case, the black - and - white evidence against the cartel was revealed in the form of damaging email communications which included statements such as «with a bit of talking and cooperation between us, we all win!&raqu
In this
case, the black - and - white
evidence against the cartel was revealed
in the form of damaging email communications which included statements such as «with a bit of talking and cooperation between us, we all win!&raqu
in the form of damaging email communications
which included statements such as «with a bit of talking and cooperation between us, we all win!»
«This
case has already been dismissed with prejudice by the court that heard it,
which ruled
in Yelp's favor and also found the claims not to be supported by credible
evidence,» Vince Sollitto, Yelp's vice president of communications said.
There isn't much
evidence that the category is more than a small niche,
in which case Apple's pricing is smart.
«There is little or no
evidence of
cases in which expert judgment does better than intelligently constructed formulas,» Kahneman said.
«Because Congress did not have a «strong basis of
evidence» upon
which to conclude that DoD was a passive participant
in pervasive, nationwide racial discrimination — at least not on the
evidence produced by DoD and relied on by the district court
in this
case — the statute fails strict scrutiny,» the decision stated.
Joan Illuzzi, the prosecutor now overseeing the Harvey Weinstein inquiry, has expertise
in cold
cases in which there is little or no physical
evidence and the credibility of witnesses is paramount.
In search of any
evidence of White House pressure on the Department of Justice, AT&T asked the judge overseeing the
case for access to White House correspondence,
which the judge denied.
By midday Tuesday Mr. Snowden himself,
in a Twitter message from his exile
in Moscow, declared that «circumstantial
evidence and conventional wisdom indicates Russian responsibility» for publication,
which he interpreted as a warning shot to the American government
in case it was thinking of imposing sanctions against Russia
in the cybertheft of documents from the Democratic National Committee.
Taxes are applied at the highest rate unless there is
evidence to support a lower percentage,
in which case an explanation is given
in the net worth summary.
Attorneys for Waymo have said
in court that over the nearly year - long
case they have amassed a file of
evidence against Uber and were ready to go to trial before the revelation of the Jacobs letter,
which came days before the original trial date.
As
evidence of this, he observed, «I can't think of any
case in which a doctor has been accused of taking money for doing something a doctor would not have done anyway.»
In the
case of creationism, for example, scientific
evidence now exists
which contradicts directly with the creation myth (unless one thinks of the creation story as being an allegory or something like that).
Has a boss who calls women employees «honey» given
evidence of evil intent,
in which case he should be properly chastized, or is he of good will but ignorant of social conventions?
On face value, W. E. Hocking's remark that when Whitehead arrived at Harvard «his speculative structure... was already well advanced
in its main outlines» is a bit of external
evidence against my hypothesis, but it may mean nothing more than that Whitehead was little influenced by the philosophical opinions and controversies of his American colleagues during these years,
which seems very much to have been the
case.
There just plain wasn't enough
evidence to support either side's version of events,
in which case a jury must acquit.
So
in other words all you have is the bible and nothing more because if have actual
evidence, you'd be the first and you should be sharing it with the world, unless of course what you consider
evidence is simply your own personal stories
in which case it is only
evidence to you and does not pertain outside of your small mind.
Dodd's whole thesis with regard to a kerygmatic chronology fails for lack of the confirming
evidence required to establish a position
which would reverse the course of scholarship, and thus must move against the stream of current views as to the probabilities
in the
case.
Here again I appeal to Susanne Langer's
evidence,
which consists largely
in noting
cases of irrational fear on the part of chimpanzees, fear that can not be explained either by instinct or by learning.
Unless, of course, there was a major disaster that rapidly buried all sorts of plant and animal life under extreme pressure,
in which case science would allow for fossil fuels to develop
in such a circu.mstance (as
evidenced in the Mt. St Helens eruption)... but said disaster never occured
in the bible, did it?
Jesus refuses to testify against himself (18:21)
which is
in fact illegal
in any
case:
evidence must come from witnesses, not from the accused.
In fact, there is a
case for saying that the zeal with
which ID is attacked by materialist scientists and philosophers is, arguably,
evidence of its explanatory force and the threat it poses to the materialist orthodoxy.
Philadelphia (CNN)- Opening arguments started Monday
in the first
case in which a Roman Catholic archdiocese official is accused of covering up
evidence of suspected sexual abuse of children.
So, show us that there is NO GOD with
evidence so we can allow Atheism to lead us into ALL «truth»,
which in this
case... THEY DO N'T HAVE IT.
Facts, or
evidence, seem incontrovertible only
in the light, or dark as the
case may be, of human judgment,
which is the only source of error on this planet.
Our criticism of ID is that itrestricts the
evidence for Intelligence to only a certain class of
cases for
which no natural explanation is said to be discernable;
in other words where there appear to be gaps
in the fabric of natural causality.
«First, if
cases can be found
in which there has been widespread human cooperation and yet there has been no success, these
cases would count as
evidence against the existence of such a conditional guarantee.
They had their own courts
in which they handled
cases concerning marriage, divorce, inheritance, and other problems of Islamic law,
evidence of the influence and power of Islam
in China at that time.
In such a (remarkable, but not - miraculous) case, he could present himself with holes in his hands and feet and in his side, to Thomas, and you and I both know that this «evidence,» which does not prove death and resurrection, still would be convincing to Thomas that Jesus both died and rose from the dea
In such a (remarkable, but not - miraculous)
case, he could present himself with holes
in his hands and feet and in his side, to Thomas, and you and I both know that this «evidence,» which does not prove death and resurrection, still would be convincing to Thomas that Jesus both died and rose from the dea
in his hands and feet and
in his side, to Thomas, and you and I both know that this «evidence,» which does not prove death and resurrection, still would be convincing to Thomas that Jesus both died and rose from the dea
in his side, to Thomas, and you and I both know that this «
evidence,»
which does not prove death and resurrection, still would be convincing to Thomas that Jesus both died and rose from the dead.
I shall assume that the aim of an explication of «valid induction» is to find a numerical or comparative function c (h, e)-- the «confirmation of hypothesis h given
evidence e» —
which is a syntactic function of the statements h and e, and
which has a high or comparatively high value
in those
cases where normally accepted or intuitive inductive methods would direct us to accept hypothesis h on
evidence e, at least
in comparison with other hypotheses having lower c - value.
Because, it is claimed, evaluation presupposes valuation as a condition of its possibility, any merely «disinterested» or «value - free» understanding of human reflection is of necessity excluded.20 Any consideration of the
evidence of experience could only
in the nature of the
case ever illustrate, but logically could not falsify what must always necessarily be the
case, even if such a consideration could well force a limited reconstrual of the hermeneutical analysis always itself presupposed
in the strictly conceptual presuppositional analysis
which uncovers the necessity of such elemental valuing.21
Of the seventy - seven
cases in which this kind of data was available, only ten were lacking
in evidence of a disturbed childhood.
Even
in the Easter affirmation of the Resurrection of Jesus, so important for Christianity, we can now point to no firm historical
evidence to show that there occurred there a miracle
which involved suspension or reversal of natural laws —
in this
case, the normal processes of decay into
which the physical body enters after the point of death.
Please tell me one, just ONE,
case in which your book was submitted as
evidence in ANY court.
Leaving aside the
evidence that arrives each day from Eastern Europe
which seems to show that the opposite is the
case, that socialism there has
in some sense «frozen» traditional ways of life, there is a more important issue: one wonders if tradition, when purchased and consumed like a commodity, can really play the role
which some conservatives believe it must
in any healthy society.
Feelings don't factor into it unless the believer is claiming that the feelings are
evidence...
in which case, the believer is a moron.
In the
case of Harpur's theory (that Jesus didn't exist, and that deliberate efforts have been made to choose to make the myths interpreted literally), his
evidence is not as convincing or as extensive as the
evidence for Jesus having been a real person, on whom a certain religious and political systems have been formed and
which have embellished, perverted, and developed certain aspects, with intentions both deliberate and unintentional.
In the 1970s
case of the German priest the only
evidence produced
which directly involves Archbishop Ratzinger shows that he allowed the suspected priest to come into his diocese for therapy and to stay briefly at a presbytery, but without pastoral work.
I wonder whether you could confirm, if you know, that that is the
case, that there was a differentiation between that and other existing provisions
in the act
which you have spoken about
in your
evidence today - that is, the purpose of certain conduct.
All the talk about signing a striker
in Jan seems to be only media gossip BUT i think based on some of what wenger has said
which is no surprise from past seasons as it appears we will not sign anyone, I hope that's not the
case BUT if it is it will be more
evidence of real misjudgment by wenger.
Not surprisingly, the media feeding frenzy has resulted, anecdotal
evidence suggests,
in a sharp drop
in youth football registrations for this fall's season, with parents fearful that playing football will almost inevitably expose their kid to an unreasonable risk of injury (
which, of course, is patently untrue; more than 7 million kids
in the U.S. currently play football, very few of whom, statistically speaking and despite a few well - publicized
cases - are likely to end up committing suicide because of the hits they sustained playing the sport, and millions upon countless millions who have played football over the past century without apparent ill effect).
While there is
evidence that accidental suffocation can and does occur
in bed - sharing situations,
in the overwhelming number of
cases (sometimes
in 100 % of them)
in which a real overlay by an adult occurs, extremely unsafe sleeping condition or conditions can be identified including situations where adults are not aware that the infant was
in the bed, or an adult sleeping partners who are drunk or desensitized by drugs, or indifferent to the presence of the baby.
It is considered the lowest form of
evidence, ranked far below randomized trials and observational studies,
which in this
case all suggest that cry - it - out is not harmful.
Except for male sex,
which was not a risk factor
in study participants, the ORs obtained from participants were similar to those obtained from all eligible
cases and controls, providing no
evidence of a noticeable selection bias.
Historically,
evidence suggests that breastfeeding was once perceived as an ordinary «everyday» experience within societies such as the UK,
in which this is now no longer the
case (Oakley, 1979; Carter, 1996).
Furthermore, every
case that involved NPS offences would require the suitably qualified medical expert to provide their
evidence in court,
which would no doubt incur a substantial financial cost
in order to secure their services.»
In each
case he said both,
which the site proves with video
evidence.