They view the questions that rise in their minds as
evidence of a lack of faith, which surely disqualifies them from being authentic believers.
It is clear
evidence of a lack of faith.
Not exact matches
Faith — steadfast assurance despite a total
lack of evidence.
Faith is the belief in something despite the
lack of evidence.
Only people who doubt God is searching for
evidence that will not be given to them because
of the
lack of faith.
Religious
faith is belief despite
evidence (or a
lack of it).
How does the
lack of evidence with Noah's Ark, the birth
of Christ, the creation story and so forth actually prove that there is no God who wants us to rely on
faith instead
of assured knowledge.
I admire your unflinching courage to consider the
lack of evidence and do away with your useless
faith.
It seems to me that the terms «dogmatic» and «
faith» are fairly synonymous in that they describe holding beliefs regardless
of lack of evidence supporting such a belief.
My
lack of faith is due to the
lack of solid
evidence, reason, and skepticism in Christianity.
and there is
faith in things despite a
lack of evidence and knowledge.
Faith is belief in spite
of, even perhaps because
of, the
lack of evidence...
Faith is not allowed to justify itself by argument.
Am I a «
faith - head» choosing to ignore the
lack of evidence?
Are you sure you've managed to pick the One True
Faith despite the total
lack of evidence to support your choice?
If we were to read even that biased
evidence more critically, we would notice the professionals upbraiding the mass
of ordinary people for
lack of faith, as if the gift
of which, we are told, modernity has deprived us was always rather the exception.
He also could have easily placed the fake bones on dinosaurs under the ground to test those
lacking in
faith... as well as removed any
evidence of the global flood after the fact because leaving definitive proof
of biblical events is unnecessary when all you should really need is
faith...
when they wrote it and how life was when they wrote it, believe it or not, I have
faith if you REALLY study the bible and all aspects
of it, you will see its weaknesses... for those who believe are known for the
lack of knowledge
of there own
faith, for those who are PROPERLY educated with open minds, quickly loose there
faith when they are saturated with the false
evidence that's abundantly around us each day..
For
lack of the necessary historical
evidence it is no longer possible to write historical accounts
of either the Mosaic migration upon which the
faith of Israel was founded, or the rise
of the Easter
faith on which Christianity is founded.
But if this content is preached, how is the preacher to escape Bultmann's charge that his sermons are history lessons calling for consent, a consent which
lacks the courage
of faith because it requires the support and legitimization
of historical
evidence before it will say «yes»?
You'll use things like «
faith» and find all kinds
of justifications for your belief, but in the end, you
lack any concrete
evidence that your story is true.
And, not least, there is
evidence of a
lack of unity,
of spiritual energy, indeed
of faith, without which any evangelising efforts must surely fail.
While it is impossible to prove a negative, the complete
lack of empirical
evidence to support belief in any God and the self - professed reliance on belief (
faith) rather than knowledge combined with a rigid and irrational unwillingness to apply basic logic with regards to these particular beliefs strongly suggests that God does not exist.
A
lack of faith in the Christian god is not based on excuses but REASON and
EVIDENCE or the
lack thereof.
It just seems people want to have
faith in some things despite
lack of evidence that they should.
I think it is fair to say that this «allergic» response to
faith sometimes seems dominant among liberal - left metropolitan commentators; I thought Williams
lacked any
evidence that it has been the position
of the Labour government.
There is a
lack of evidence about the magnitude
of health services represented and provided by
faith - based organisations.
However, APHIS established a third penalty reduction — 25 percent — which it gives to the majority
of violators that are unable to show either
evidence of good
faith or a
lack of it — no
evidence either way.
Either — you know what you're talking about, and so can answer your questioner; or — you can't answer, and make up all sorts
of pathetic evasive excuses like the question
lacks good
faith, you don't like rabbit holes, asking the person to go and find the
evidence you claim, etc etc.....
An employer who discloses information about a former employee's job performance to a prospective employer
of the former employee upon request
of the prospective employer or
of the former employee is presumed to be acting in good
faith and, unless
lack of good
faith is shown by clear and convincing
evidence, is immune from civil liability for such disclosure or its consequences.
The court then considered — but ultimately rejected — the husband's argument that the wife's failure to disclose her affair and possible intention to leave was
evidence of a
lack of good
faith and therefore fatal to the agreement's validity.
Australian academic Desmond Manderson responded to the report for The Conversation with a fascinating examination
of the «illegality»
of drugs, and why it continues despite the
lack of evidence, encompassing ideas about racism, social anxieties,
faith and fear.