Not exact matches
At cl 4 (5) the Lord Chancellor is to have regard to the
actual investments made by investors
of relevant
damages, although there is no requirement for him to publish any
evidence he considers
of such investor behaviour.
[19] More importantly, there was no
evidence of any kind that the Respondent suffered any
actual damage as a result
of the termination.
The deputy judge had already found that the
evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish either causation or
actual damages in her assessment
of the Respondent's claim for mental distress.
The defendant employer appealed the award
of aggravated
damages given by the deputy judge, arguing that she erred in law when she awarded aggravated
damages when there was no finding by the deputy judge that the employer had conducted itself in a manner that was unfair or in bad faith when it terminated Mr. Walker such as to justify an award
of aggravated
damages; and furthermore, there was no
evidence, in any form, to show that the Respondent suffered any
actual damages as a result
of his termination.
For such a business claim to succeed, the judge had been entitled to require specific
evidence such as
evidence of the
actual use
of the
damaged vehicle for business purposes before the accident and the use to which the hire vehicles had been put during the period
of hire.
The affidavit
evidence must be specific, must be based on the personal knowledge
of the affiant as much as possible and should specify that the
actual or potential
damage to the plaintiff is «very serious».
Barking Hound argued that the trial court erred in not granting summary judgment on this claim because the plaintiff had failed to present
evidence that the deceased dog had
actual market value, which Barking Hound contends is the sole form
of damages recoverable.
«We believe this verdict is not justified by the
evidence, and that the award is clearly excessive and far out
of line with any factual assessment
of actual damages,» Kristina Chang, a Janssen spokeswoman, said in an e-mailed statement.
Generally speaking, the Court is not going to award any
damages for accelerated depreciation unless there is direct
evidence supporting an
actual loss suffered by the owner
of the
damaged vehicle.
Dismissal for lack
of evidence or prosecutorial discretion is not the same as having a right recognized on the record that would enable you to win a claim for false arrest or other
damages, get state laws struck down, etc. that would be able to be done if you had an
actual right.
In the appeal, the defense argued that if the bills have to go in, then the amounts actually paid should go in too and that the jury can then decide, based on this competing
evidence, what the
actual «value»
of the services was for purposes
of assessing
damages.
The hospital ultimately moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted, finding that: (1) the technologist did not act within the scope
of her duties, as is necessary for the hospital to be vicariously liable for the technologist's conduct; (2) the plaintiffs failed to adduce sufficient
evidence to support a finding
of intentional infliction
of emotional distress; and (3) none
of the plaintiffs suffered
actual damages as a result
of the technologist's conduct.
The trial court had found that while the Appraiser and Lender may have acted with conscious disregard
of the false statement made to the buyers, there was no
evidence that they had
actual knowledge
of the Beeman's fraud and so the trial court did not submit the punitive
damage claims against the Appraiser and the Lender to the jury.