The franchisee argued that the particular expert was one of many the arbitrator had worked with in the past and there was
no evidence of any actual bias.
Not exact matches
The authors concluded that the
actual gap may be much smaller, as they found «
evidence of bias in the meta - dataset toward studies reporting higher conventional yields.»
I understand where cynics come from, and some cynicism is normal and ok, but it can quickly get kind
of excessive, and negative and susceptible to confirmation
bias, and poor understanding
of actual evidence.
- projecting your lack
of knowledge and
biases onto others (and especially onto the
actual body
of evidence), and
The IPCC, says the IAC, needs to replace data manipulation, suppression and
bias with honest science; end conflicts
of interest; incorporate contrary data and opinions; and back up headline - grabbing disaster claims with
actual evidence (not just computer modesls or World Wildlife Fund press releases).
(2) thou shalt not fudge the data (3) thou shalt not invent arbitrary statistical methods to suit thy data (4) thou shalt not indulge in any form
of bias e.g. thou shalt not employ incomplete, highly selective, subjective literature reviews (6) in the interests
of transparency and replication thou shalt not hide the data or code (7) thou shalt not make vague or exaggerated statements unsupported by
evidence (8) thou shalt not tolerate
actual or potential conflicts
of interest (9) thou shalt not allow political interference to compromise scientific integrity (10) thou shalt not use unvalidated computer models (11) Thy university shall insulate undergraduate fees from research expenses and require research to be self supporting independent
of the teaching.
(2) thou shalt not fudge the data (3) thou shalt not invent arbitrary statistical methods to suit thy data (4) thou shalt not indulge in any form
of bias e.g. thou shalt not employ incomplete, highly selective, subjective literature reviews (5) thou shalt not exaggerate (6) in the interests
of transparency and replication thou shalt not hide the data or code (7) thou shalt not make vague statements unsupported by
evidence (8) thou shalt not tolerate
actual or potential conflicts
of interest (9) thou shalt not allow political interference to compromise scientific integrity (10) thou shalt not use unvalidated computer models
The principle in R v Sussex Justices [1924] 1 KB 256, [1923] All ER Rep 233 — justice must not only be done but must manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done — requires that, even where a tribunal shows no
actual evidence of bias, it must also satisfy the «apparent
bias test» in Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 676 [2002] 2 AC, para 103 «whether the fair minded and informed observer, having considered the facts conclude that there was a real possibility that the tribunal was
biased».
(correct test for Barrister appeals; whether outside the ex improviso rule, prosecutor may call
evidence after prosecution and defence case closed; use
of debarring orders against prosecutor; whether tribunal may «enter the arena» and strongly request the attendance
of a prosecution witness; whether BSB has power to summons witnesses; whether prosecutor may communicate with disciplinary judge behind the back
of the defence; whether such communication redolent
of actual bias of judge where judge wishes prosecutor good luck on appeal; whether apparent
bias doctrine can be engaged by post-trial conduct
of judge; legal effect
of serving BSB prosecutions department officer being 1
of 4 appointing members
of the COIC «Tribunals Appointments Body» (TAB); whether TAB ultra vires the Bar's Constitutions; whether open - ended power
of removal
of member
of COIC pool without cause, unlawful given position
of BSB Chair and senior staff on COIC; whether ECHR Article 6 guarantees against pressure on disciplinary judges to conform with a prosecutorial mentality; whether disciplinary judges Art. 6 «independent» within Findlay v United Kingdom given key role
of BSB prosecutions department in appointing disciplinary judges; serious non-disclosure by BSB
of notes
of secret meeting between BSB and disciplinary judge until day before appeal and despite requests and application for disclosure by defence)
... the assertion that a visible manifestation
of a Sikh officer's religious faith, as part
of his uniform, will create a reasonable apprehension
of bias is not based upon any
actual concrete
evidence.