The bottom panel shows
the evidence of ocean acidification, an important clue that the warming was due to carbon dioxide.
Not exact matches
New NOAA - led research maps the distribution
of aragonite saturation state in both surface and subsurface waters
of the global
ocean and provides further
evidence that
ocean acidification is happening on a global scale.
The lab finding is «part
of a growing body
of evidence that
ocean acidification alone and combined with other stressors will have effects beyond shell mineralization,» said Terrie Klinger, a University
of Washington marine sciences professor studying the impacts
of acidification.
A team
of European geoscientists has found the most direct
evidence yet that
ocean acidification was a major part
of the die - off.
Oceanic uptake
of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) causes pronounced shifts in marine carbonate chemistry and a decrease in seawater pH. Increasing
evidence indicates that these changes — summarized by the term
ocean acidification (OA)-- can significantly affect marine food webs and biogeochemical cycles.
An international research group led by the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for
Ocean Research Kiel has now found
evidence for potentially harmful effects the increasing
acidification of the
oceans may have on larvae
of commercially important fish species such as cod.
Therefore, there is, as yet, no robust
evidence for realized severe disruptions
of marine socioecological links from
ocean acidification to anthropogenic CO2, and there are significant uncertainties regarding the level
of pH change that would prompt such impacts.
There is no
evidence that the rates
of overfishing,
ocean acidification and pollution are «accelerating.»
What it means In summing up the implications
of their findings, the Portuguese scientists say that they further support the fact that «there is no
evidence of CO2 - related mortalities
of juvenile or adult bivalves in natural habitats, even under conditions that far exceed the worst - case scenarios for future
ocean acidification (Tunnicliffe et al., 2009).»
In summing up the implications
of their findings, the Portuguese scientists say that they further support the fact that «there is no
evidence of CO2 - related mortalities
of juvenile or adult bivalves in natural habitats, even under conditions that far exceed the worst - case scenarios for future
ocean acidification (Tunnicliffe et al., 2009).»
This
evidence unearthed late last year seemed to confirm it:
Ocean Acidification may well turn out to be the marine version
of Michael Mann's Hockey Stick.
Growing
evidence suggests that
ocean acidification will strongly impact many types
of marine organisms, from microscopic plankton to shellfish and corals.
Whether we look at the steady increase in global temperature; the buildup
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to the highest level in a half - million years; the march
of warmest - ever years (9
of the10 hottest on record have occurred since 2000); the dramatic shrinking
of mountain glaciers and Arctic sea ice; the accelerating rise in sea level; or the
acidification of our
oceans; the tale told by the
evidence is consistent and it is compelling.
The 2009 State
of the Climate Report
of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) tells us that climate change is real because
of rising surface air temperatures since 1880 over land and the
ocean,
ocean acidification, sea level rise, glaciers melting, rising specific humidity,
ocean heat content increasing, sea ice retreating, glaciers diminishing, Northern Hemisphere snow cover decreasing, and so many other lines
of evidence.
The anthropogenic influence on atmospheric CO2 is about as solid as science gets, supported by multiple lines
of evidence — simple accounting,
ocean acidification,
ocean CO2 increasing at the surface (by Salby it would have to be decreasing), decreasing atmospheric O2, isotopic balances, etc..
The
evidence includes accelerated sea level rise, rising global temperatures, warming
oceans, declining Arctic ice sheet, worldwide glaciers retreat, increase
of extreme weather events and
ocean acidification.
I'm against
Ocean Acidification theory because I've done loads and loads
of background reading... about the lack
of credible scientific
evidence that it represents any kind
of problem... in the eyes
of all those undecideds who can't make up their mind whether they agree with me on climate science or whether I'm talking bollocks...»
There are no radical departures in this report from the previous assessment, published in 2007; just a great deal more
evidence demonstrating the extent
of global temperature rises, the melting
of ice sheets and sea ice, the retreat
of the glaciers, the rising and
acidification of the
oceans and the changes in weather patterns (3).
The
evidence that
Ocean Acidification represents any kind
of threat is threadbare — and getting flimsier by the day.
It is unprecedented in its scale and scope, and examines
evidence of changes in
ocean temperature and ecosystems, rising
acidification and methane levels, and massive shrinkage
of the polar ice caps.
Some comforting reassurances on
ocean acidification and the rate
of sea level rise would go down a treat — all the
evidence I've seen on these ugly items is pretty discouraging so far.
Rocky shores are one
of the few ecosystems for which field
evidence of the effects
of ocean acidification is available.
New findings from fieldwork undertaken at the University
of Sydney's One Tree Island Research Station provide
evidence ocean acidification resulting from carbon dioxide emissions is already slowing coral reef growth.
If the paper finds
evidence that
ocean acidification is serious, the paper is categorised as pro-AGW and added to the list
of papers addressing the «
ocean acidification isn't serious» myth.
I believe the strong role
of anthropogenic contributions to climate change with potentially significant adverse impacts (global warming and
ocean acidification) is well documented by a large array
of independent
evidence.
Consider the facts: the climate system is indicated to have left the natural cycle path; multiple lines
of evidence and studies from different fields all point to the human fingerprint on current climate change; the convergence
of these
evidence lines include ice mass loss, pattern changes,
ocean acidification, plant and species migration, isotopic signature
of CO2, changes in atmospheric composition, and many others.
The increasing
acidification of the
oceans is another line
of evidence indicating the overloading
of the atmosphere with CO2,
evidence independent
of any computer modeling.