Most cases show only
evidence of problems in the mouth, nasal passages and the conjunctiva (mucus membranes) of the eyes.
Not exact matches
In the post, Coleman runs down all the
evidence for the many benefits
of lifelong learning, turning up studies and reports that show continual study is the cure for many
of life's most pressing
problems.
This valuable
evidence is indicative
of the power
of content marketing, and is one more reason for you to step up your game
in terms
of offering valuable, free content that solves a key
problem for your target audience.
But officials are now dealing with a fresh
problem:
evidence of active transmission by mosquitoes
in the Wynwood neighborhood
of Miami.
«When you have
evidence of a
problem like this, regardless
of what the standards say, automakers should develop a better approach,» says David Friedman, who served as NHTSA's acting administrator
in 2014 and is now director
of cars and product policy and analysis at Consumers Union, the policy and mobilization division
of Consumer Reports.
The company said it found no
evidence of a widespread
problem in its iCloud or Find my iPhone services.
Those
of us interested
in cybersecurity were underwhelmed by the amount
of air time the issue got during most
of the 2016 campaign, but worse was the empirical
evidence that the Democratic candidate — famous for an email security
problem — was clueless about cybersecurity.
While a smaller issue
in comparison, largely because it doesn't impact the live ethereum network, the
problems facing the Casper test network also provide
evidence of the early - stage nature
of ethereum as a technology.
The
problem is that when a religion gets
in the way people lose objectivity
in weighing the value
of various types
of evidence.
Before the era
of mass incarceration, there was already
evidence linking
problems in poor neighborhoods to the high number
of single - parent households and also to the high rate
of mobility: the continual turnover on many blocks as transients moved
in and out.
Mr. Hawking wins easy battles against uneducated (
in science) religious persons, but taking his statement on perspective, He is based on assumptions with serious underlying
problems, basically everything from mathematics, to the incompatibility
of quantum mechanics and relativity, and the lack
of proof and
evidence for string theories, he is launching a very aggressive statement, probably his last effort on life to counter the anthropomorphic ideas
of God, and this is very common
in all scientists.
In sum, although a few apologists such as Stephanie Coontz still insist otherwise, just about everyone else in possession of the evidence acknowledges that the sexual revolution has weakened family ties, and that family ties (the presence of a biologically related mother and father in the home) have turned out to be important indicators of child well - being — and more, that the broken home is not just a problem for individuals but also for societ
In sum, although a few apologists such as Stephanie Coontz still insist otherwise, just about everyone else
in possession of the evidence acknowledges that the sexual revolution has weakened family ties, and that family ties (the presence of a biologically related mother and father in the home) have turned out to be important indicators of child well - being — and more, that the broken home is not just a problem for individuals but also for societ
in possession
of the
evidence acknowledges that the sexual revolution has weakened family ties, and that family ties (the presence
of a biologically related mother and father
in the home) have turned out to be important indicators of child well - being — and more, that the broken home is not just a problem for individuals but also for societ
in the home) have turned out to be important indicators
of child well - being — and more, that the broken home is not just a
problem for individuals but also for society.
The sad part it, these numbers you trot out, which you are oblivious to the statistical
problems inherent
in them, were obviously put together by someone with a knowledge
of statistics and manipulated so gullible people like yourself would use them to argue a cause which the true
evidence does not support.
The
problem is most believers believe
in that type
of God, which your school
of thought can not set those parameters around.Now if that school
of thought helps you come to a belief or an opinion that there is no God then fine, because I certainly could not bring any solid
evidence to contradict that belief, but if your proclaiming that there is no God to be a fact, there really is no basis for that fact.
The
problem for the skeptic is that there is no
evidence for anything
in the web and so nothing
in the web
of theories can be tested objectively.
Macroevolution posed a
problem to Darwin because his principle
of descent with modification predicts gradual transitions between small - scale adaptive changes
in populations and these larger - scale phenomena, yet there is little
evidence for such transitions
in nature.
I have no
problem saying that an intelligent person could believe, and this is because humans tend to compartmentalize their beliefs, and give special exceptions
in terms
of standards
of evidence to the belief that they were either raised with, or feels most comfortable to them.
I will further try to show that Whitehead the metaphysician displays interests
in important respects not unlike those
of Hegel, but that
in his solutions to certain metaphysical
problems, Whitehead not only
evidences a conception
of metaphysics quite different, and considerably more modest than that
of Hegel, but also (and this will be my main point) develops his position
in terms
of a logic that is entirely non-dialectical.
Of course, to the man without faith this appears to be both a piece of evasion of real issues in that it shelves difficult problems, and a piece of wishful thinking in that it believes in the ultimate goodness of God in some nebulous hereafter, even though the daily evidence of life denies such goodness and lov
Of course, to the man without faith this appears to be both a piece
of evasion of real issues in that it shelves difficult problems, and a piece of wishful thinking in that it believes in the ultimate goodness of God in some nebulous hereafter, even though the daily evidence of life denies such goodness and lov
of evasion
of real issues in that it shelves difficult problems, and a piece of wishful thinking in that it believes in the ultimate goodness of God in some nebulous hereafter, even though the daily evidence of life denies such goodness and lov
of real issues
in that it shelves difficult
problems, and a piece
of wishful thinking in that it believes in the ultimate goodness of God in some nebulous hereafter, even though the daily evidence of life denies such goodness and lov
of wishful thinking
in that it believes
in the ultimate goodness
of God in some nebulous hereafter, even though the daily evidence of life denies such goodness and lov
of God
in some nebulous hereafter, even though the daily
evidence of life denies such goodness and lov
of life denies such goodness and love.
And secondly, Stephen Barr's point seems to be a real solution: that theologians need to learn the language
of science - not just absorbing the factual
evidence of recent discoveries, but also the methodologies and modes
of thought that scientists, whether quantum physicists or population geneticists, employ
in their day - to - day grappling with
problems in their fields.
The New Jerusalem, however, poses a
problem: for, though it can certainly be seen as
evidence for Chesterton's Zionism and for his appreciation
of the «mystical as well as mysterious» dimension
of the Jewish heritage, it also contains passages which explain why Gopnik perceives Chesterton's agreement with the Zionist's perception that «we are aliens here»
in a sinister light.
Having examined
evidence such as Big Bang cosmology (yup, I'm what you'd call an «old earth» creationist), the Cambrian explosion
in the fossil record, the
problems of abiogenesis, and textual criticism
of the Bible, I've found that the Bible describes historical events and other aspects
of reality much more plausibly than any other faith system.
Reason,
evidence, scientific method — A commitment to the use
of critical reason, factual
evidence and scientific method
of inquiry
in seeking solutions to human
problems and answers to important human questions.
But also it does seem to suggest that the universe exists because
of God's creative action and the scientific
evidence we have indicates that this creative action was not a one - off event because,
in addition to the
problem of inheritance, the actual conditions for life to occur on Earth are so stringent that they could not have happened by a process
of natural chance.
Whatever may be the solution
of this difficult and perhaps insoluble
problem, the
evidence of the New Testament is clear that an organized cultus, with accompanying ideas
of sacramental efficacy, was already
in process
of formation before the canon closed.
The
problem lies
in the fact that modern society has evolved effective justice and penalty, based on the collection
of facts and
evidence.
Speculation about what nature is
in itself, backed up by rational arguments, particularly about the mind - body
problem, and empirical
evidence from the sciences, is therefore a necessary dimension
of a process Christian theology.
A part
of the
problem listing
evidence is that there is so much that a few are stated and then believers try to pick away at those
in isolation.
The
problem is not one
of deciding
in favor
of Bellah's emphasis or Berger's (plenty
of evidence exists to support the importance
of both types
of symbolism
in most religions).
First, he should make up his mind,
in the light
of the
evidence, on the
problems of authorship taking into consideration the value
of the speeches
in Acts.
One might invoke Bedouin rule as parallel, but the better course is to drop the
problem for lack
of evidence and go on to our earliest sources for Israel's life after the settlement
in Palestine.
They had their own courts
in which they handled cases concerning marriage, divorce, inheritance, and other
problems of Islamic law,
evidence of the influence and power
of Islam
in China at that time.
The
problem is,
of course, that there is no
evidence, nor a rational narrative
in favor
of belief.
RB, This is a
problem for us
in a discussion if you allow questions to considered
evidence, things that have perfectly good natural explanations as
evidence of supernatural things, etc..
The only
problem is,
in the entire history
of atheism, not one atheist has ever been able to offer even a single shred
of evidence to back up their claim that God doesn't exist.
Wolfhart Pannenberg
evidences more concern for the
problem of the particularity
of his theological subject by basing his theology
in historical revelation as universal.
Significant empirical
evidence concerning the amount
of drinking and
of problem drinking among various social class groups was made available
in 1963 when Harold A. Mulford reported on a scientific survey
of a cross section
of the non-institutionalized adult population
in the United States.
Eight years
of experience with special training programs for men who have been
in the ministry at least five years have provided a vast amount
of evidence as to the basic
problems confronting Christian ministers today.
But my biggest
problem with all these stories is with the idea
of a god who generally tries to hide anything that could be seen as real
evidence (because you need faith) and then slips up and shows it every now and then
in very culturally and belief specific ways.
Though the
problem is so rooted
in the nature
of both Church and secular society that it is always present, yet it has a peculiar urgency for the modern church which is confronted with unusual
evidences of misery
in the life
of human communities and
of weakness within itself.
As for celibacy, if instances
of clerical sexual abuse, including homosexual abuse, are as frequent
in churches where the clergy can marry» and the
evidence is that they are» celibacy would seem to be, at most, marginally related to the
problems that produced the scandals.
Michael Behe (
in The Edge
of Evolution) points out that there is abundant
evidence for «microevolution» (smaller population change), but there is a boundary at which the
evidence for microevolution stops and
evidence for macroevolution either doesn't exist, or any clues that do exist are beset with
problems so serious that explanatory attempts boil down to «just - so - stories.»
Some
evidences of this,
in spite
of problems still to be resolved, may be seen
in the birth
of both the ecumenical movement and the United Nations
in our time.
There is abundant
evidence that Catholics
in this country do sincerely believe
in democracy and practice this belief, but I do not see how they themselves can deny that their polity poses a
problem for democracy that is not posed by churches which make their decisions
in regard to public policy by processes
of open discussion
in which both clergy and laymen share.
In the late 1970s a Home Office Minister, advised by his Civil Servants, told me there was no paedophile problem in the United Kingdom despite the evidence presented to him by a deputation of MP
In the late 1970s a Home Office Minister, advised by his Civil Servants, told me there was no paedophile
problem in the United Kingdom despite the evidence presented to him by a deputation of MP
in the United Kingdom despite the
evidence presented to him by a deputation
of MPs.
These may appear at first glance to be merely practical
problems, but there is already
evidence that
in the long term they might well prove to be symptomatic
of moral and theological ones too.
In persons at risk for blood sugar
problems, intake
of both oats and oatmeal have been associated with healthier levels
of hemoglobin A1C — which researchers consider
evidence of blood sugar support provided by the intake
of this grain.
Although chile powder is notorious for causing sneezing and coughing among those who inhale it, there is anecdotal
evidence of the use
of Capsicums
in breathing and lung
problems.
Six years later, there is little
evidence that this
problem has been completely rectified given the number
of non-compliances issued by auditors due to training shortcomings
in the industry.
There are various theories about why the Gunners keep falling short
in the race for the Premier League title and our various and numerous injury
problems certainly do not help, but it is the way that the team fails to turn up at times
in crucial games, such as the EPL defeat by Wartford recently or the Champions League hammering at the hands
of Bayern Munich that many will point to as
evidence that the boss is not getting the best from his squad anymore.