Not exact matches
Benefits: Greater accountability; Drawing teachers
focus on what skills need to be taught; Identification
of students who have not reached expected benchmarks in reading and numeracy, supported by
evidence and data; Improved preservice teacher training and teacher professional
learning.
Glenn Finger, Professor
of Education and Dean (
Learning and Teaching) of the Arts, Education and Law Group at Queensland's Griffith University said the report highlights the need for an evidence - informed approach which focuses on teacher education students learning and demonstrating approaches which improve student l
Learning and Teaching)
of the Arts, Education and Law Group at Queensland's Griffith University said the report highlights the need for an
evidence - informed approach which
focuses on teacher education
students learning and demonstrating approaches which improve student l
learning and demonstrating approaches which improve
student learninglearning.
When it comes to a
focus on
students, research suggests effective professional
learning communities «make intelligent use
of evidence to pinpoint areas needing intervention to enhance
learning outcomes for all
students».
While the rationale is perhaps a bit misguided (some
evidence suggests that our
students already experience as much instructional time as their peers ~ and other research confirms that teachers in the United States spend more time on instruction than teachers in other nations do) ~ there are certainly reasons to
focus on the issue ~ not least
of which is the summer
learning loss that disproportionately impacts our nations most disadvantaged youth.
Teachers» time and resources would be better spent on
focusing on providing timely and specific feedback to
students as there is strong
evidence which shows this has an impact of eight months» worth of learning progress (Evidence for Learning,
evidence which shows this has an impact
of eight months» worth
of learning progress (Evidence for Learning,
learning progress (
Evidence for Learning,
Evidence for
Learning,
Learning, 2017b).
Students learn through the following tasks: - Gauging and collaborating previous knowledge
of «propaganda» through a discussion - based starter task; - Using an interactive, out -
of - seat, group activity to build understanding
of the features
of propaganda; - Reading chapters 7 and 8 with a particular
focus on the character
of Squealer, and demonstrating their understanding through a related activity sheet; - Developing their understanding
of Squealer's actions, and finding textual
evidence to back this up, through a scaffolded, retrieval activity; - Using their imaginative and creative skills, in addition to their knowledge
of Squealer and propaganda posters, to construct their own propaganda poster for Animal Farm; - Peer assessing their partners»
learning attempts.
States could use their authority over teacher preparation programs to strengthen the qualifications
of beginning teachers and lower costs to districts by
focusing on the recruitment and admission
of a qualified pool, rigorous clinical preparation, and collecting
evidence of program impact (hiring rates, graduate and employer satisfaction, Pre-K — 12
student learning, and related measures).
If the authors
of the above article want to really help teachers differentiate their programs to improve
learning outcomes for every
student, offer practical,
evidence - based suggestions
focusing on the «how».
But when leaders can provide a frame that's
focused on instruction and say «listen, all forms
of evidence are useful here, what we want you to do is anchor your instructional decisions in
evidence, and talk about instruction and use that
evidence to think about
student thinking... what do we really know about
student learning in this context?»
The RAND study
focuses on three key variables that schools
focused on to varying degrees — flexible pacing,
student choices to personalize
learning, and evaluation based on
evidence of proficiency.
To assess their effectiveness in helping all
students learn, educators in a PLC
focus on results —
evidence of student learning.
Evidence of student learning and
student learning challenges provide direction and
focus for coaches and teachers in their work together.
They use the same research - based formative
learning processes that raise
student achievement by
focusing on three powerful sources
of evidence, knowing where
learning is headed, having a clear understanding
of where it is now and using up - to - the - minute
evidence to decide what to do next to improve understanding (Black & Wiliam, 1998; Moss & Brookhart, 2009, 2012).
The most compelling line
of research
focuses on teachers «use
of formative or «just - in - time
evidence «232 about
students «
learning to shape their own instruction.
The tasks teachers engineer to elicit
evidence of student learning must be designed to align with the standard on which they are
focused.
For example, when Christina was
focused on her goal around
student - to -
student interactions, Jan looked for
evidence of Christina fostering an environment in which
students demonstrated respect, caring, and support for one another's
learning.
Through 2005, there is little research
focused on implementing technology in the K - 12 social studies classroom (Swan & Hofer, in press), yet many authors advocate that teachers need to explore this frontier without models
of classroom success, examples
of «tried and true» curricula, and
evidence of increased
student learning.
Considered a seasoned collaborator and
evidence - based strategist, Dr. McGlawn served as the Senior Associate for Linked
Learning at The Education Trust - West, where she led assessments
of Linked
Learning implementation, with a strong
focus on the quality
of curriculum and instruction delivered through Linked
Learning pathways, as well as equitable systemic access and improved outcomes for
students.
Focusing on
evidence prompted further discussions about lesson planning,
learning progressions, tiered levels
of support, and new instructional strategies to move individual
students from where they are to where they need to be.
As a member
of the task force, I am excited for the opportunity to join my colleagues in making recommendations to craft a new structure to improve California's education system
focused on inclusive education practices, high expectations for
students and education leaders, and providing
evidence - based instruction and
learning supports so that all
students have an opportunity to
learn the standards in all core subject areas, which will ultimately lead to increased accountability and academic success for all.
It prepares district and school administrators and / or leadership teams to: • Make data actionable and competency - based • Use data to bring coherence across improvement initiatives & maximize their impact • Build a system - wide culture
of data - literacy and
student -
focused teaching and
learning • Create capacity to collect
evidence needed to validate successful implementation and gauge impact on achievement Leaders will
learn what it takes to initiate, support, and sustain the meaningful and productive use
of data throughout an organization — with an emphasis on how to support teachers» use
of data.
The
evidence from research on these and other systems indicate that through using performance assessments schools can
focus instruction on higher order skills, provide a more accurate measure
of what
students know and can do, engage
students more deeply in
learning, and provide for more timely feedback to teachers, parents, and
students in order to monitor and alter instruction.
During the classroom walkthroughs, principals record descriptive
evidence of student learning to
focus specifically on the elements that provide the
students with relevant, challenging, and empowering
learning experiences.
This framework provides a structure for analyzing the process
of teaching and
learning in a lesson or shorter instructional episode and
focuses on four fundamental steps: (a) specification
of learning goals; (b) analysis
of evidence of student progress and / or difficulties; (c) reasoning about impact
of teaching decisions on
student thinking and
learning; and (d) suggestions for next steps and instructional improvement (Hiebert, Morris, Berk, & Jansen, 2007; Santagata, Zannoni, & Stigler, 2007).
This study
focused on an underexamined aspect
of teacher competence — the ability to draw on
evidence of student thinking and
learning directly linked to lesson
learning goals to assess the effectiveness
of teaching.
During a recent round
of consultation sessions, which included
focused «
learning walks,» we were able to gather
evidence of how teachers are amplifying
student language use.
Robert's rationale for his Lesson 1 evaluation
of a 3 (i.e., midway between not at all effective, 1, and very effective, 5) was vague along the
Focus and Quality
of Evidence dimension, in that it lacked a direct connection to his lesson
learning goal
of students coming to understand the base - ten system through the use
of a place value chart.
The
focus will be on effective teaching
of mathematics for all
students by emphasizing visualization, spatial reasoning and
evidence of learning.
The
focus of this session is on effective teaching
of mathematics for all
students by emphasizing visualization, spatial reasoning and
evidence of learning.
But standardized tests
focus on just a narrow slice
of student learning and experience; they provide neither insight into a given school's strengths and weaknesses nor much
evidence regarding whether the school should be closed or overhauled.
The researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with
focus groups and recorded
evidence of student learning through anecdotal reports.
Our design
focuses on providing
evidence, direct or indirect, about the effects
of district policies and practices on schools, classrooms, and
student learning.
Within these pages, you will find valuable information on why traditional grading fails our
students, as well as ideas that will inspire you to create an
evidence - based grading system that
focuses on supporting
students in the cycle
of learning.»
CMHC's training site provides excellent opportunities for family and marriage therapists, social workers, as well as graduate
students in the field
of psychology, to
learn about severe psychiatric disorders, complex trauma, and to
learn skills
of rapid stabilization through
focused and
evidence based treatment methods.