Not exact matches
While I respect your stance, my main problem is that your arguments are almost entirely based on suppositions
of what Amazon might do rather than what they have done or any
actual numbers or
evidence.
It says nothing about people rushing to stoke the engine with more and more coal, or how much
actual coal is added (thus the
actual range
of speeds to expect), or the possibility
of a precipice with bridge out up ahead (runaway GW), how dangerous that might be at various speeds, entailing greater or less
number of deaths, or how far or close that precipice is, which we don't know either (except we have some fossil
evidence of train wrecks in which 90 %
of life died, so we know it could be bad).
But in two
of these seven populations (Davis Strait and Southern Beaufort Sea) there was good
evidence from
actual population studies that
numbers were increasing, which was overturned in the final analysis by «estimates»
of decline.
Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative
evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare
actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half
of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression
of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the
number of long term thermal radiation / heat energy absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx
of energy to the lower atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends
of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels
of ghg has stabilized.
IPCC relied heavily on the since discredited Mann hockey stick and «spaghetti copies», but the
number of studies cited by NIPCC make a pretty strong argument for a warmer MWP, as extensive historical records as well as
actual physical
evidence from today have also suggested.
Moreover, at the mid point
of 2012 we are seeing
evidence that the
number of claims reported is up again and that claims costs for the 2012 program (that is projected costs for resolving
actual claims plus the cost
of running LAWPRO's claims units) will come in at the same $ 100 million level if not more.
The General Court noted that McDonald's had to provide
evidence of actual use
of a sufficient
number of trade marks to constitute a family.
Joyce said there was «no
evidence before me that the financial institutions were aware
of the large increase in the
number of marijuana grow operations in homes in the Lower Mainland or that they ought to have been aware based on their
actual experience as
of 2002.