Sentences with phrase «evidence of the existence»

Apart from transmitting a positive signal, the act of liking something is evidence of existence in the online realm.

Neither is there any single solitary shred of evidence of the existence of God.

A god could do anything, and hide evidence of its existence perfectly well, there is then nothing I can provide you which proves a god is not possible.

Seriously, a scrap of papyrus is somehow taken this seriously, but the fact that no first century historian wrote of Jesus, that Jesus himself left no writings, that Jesus left no Physical evidence of his existence, those don't matter, right?

A related question but on a more modern front is, Why can't god put up some clear modern evidence of his existence?

And why would we have evidence of what is designed but no actual evidence of the existence of the designer?

Oh wait, I don't believe yet but I will believe as soon as some evidence of his existence and a need for his existence is shown.

I was responding to your implication that you had evidence of the existence of God and wanted to know what that evidence was.

It is not my purpose nor intent to provide you with empirical evidence of the existence of God.

I'm more than willing to believe in God if I see any evidence of his existence.

They come very close to admitting God doesn't answer prayer when they explain that if God answered too many prayers it would be evidence of his existence and then people wouldn't need to develop faith.

Instead they'll be trying to find evidence of his existence, and when people are looking for evidence to support a bias they can always find it, particularly when the evidence is all in your perceptions, in your mind.

God has already put evidence of His existence in our hearts and creation according to the book of Romans.

The claims that God doesn't want to be «readily known» and carefully avoids providing evidence of his existence were contrived to explain the lack of evidence.

Well if it's slightly more evidence of the existence of a man outside of Italy in the 1st century who was born of a virgin, died for 3 days before resurrecting himself, then explained he only died because of «original sin» which is the idea that a woman ate magical apple given from a talking snake in a garden at the beginning of time which caused all humans to go to hell when they died.

«The standard Christian explanation for why there is no evidence of God's existence is that if there were evidence of his existence we wouldn't need faith.

No one can describe the actions of something that has no evidence of existence.

JW, Why do you consider defined promises, however wonderful they may be, evidence of existence of the god purported to have given those promises?

Outside of the New Testament there is little if any contemporary evidence of his existence.

Jesus never existed; there is absolutely no evidence of his existence (except the Christian bible) anywhere.

That would make no sense to me, given that I am the one who withheld all evidence of my existence in the first place.

But, their act would be meaningless, as far as evidence of existence.

Stories about a magical hero are not evidence of the existence of a non magical person.

If your god (or any god) provides some concrete evidence of his existence, then there would be an actual choice to make; otherwise, it's just believing what someone else tells you without any real reason to.

So a written story isn't evidence of his marriage, but a written story IS evidence of his existence?

Those aren't evidence of the existence of a non magical man.

If there were any such reason, it would be world - wide news given none exists thus far (despite many people devoting their lives to trying to show evidence of the existence of a god).

What I love the most is that it is God himself who hides and withholds all evidence of his existence and then punishes those for not believing in him.

God has given us much evidence of His existence: how about the intricacies of how the human body works - can you really believe that happened without a master plan; what about the beauty of nature - can we really think that that just happened; what about the testimony of millions throughout the ages including Scientists attempting to disprove God, that point to things beyond their comprehension or doing.

You stated that you have evidence of the existence of a deity and point to simple reproduction as evidence.

Only «gods» could understand such evidence and since «man» is not immortal, then «humanity» are not Gods therefore could never have the capacity to understand any evidence of the existence of a «God.»

there is no need to be concerned for spiffy, spiffy does not exist, he appears merely as words on a page, no evidence of existence whatsoever, do not be sucked into the «spiffy» con.

God has given sufficient evidence of His existence and of the divine inspiration of the Scriptures by means of fulfilled prophecy.

If there were a God, and he wanted there to be evidence of his existence, there would be evidence.

Similarly, there is no reason to believe in supernatural beings unless there is definitive evidence of their existence.

@thecollegeadmissionsguru «I would be more interested in how you defend the fact that there is NOT ONE single piece of evidence of the existence of a historical Jesus.»

When we refuse to believe the evidence of the existence of a benevolent creative supreme being, a.k.a. God, we inevitably embrace the alternative, in other words, the Me!

For two reasons: One, there is no reason to believe in the existence of a supreme being until irrefutable evidence of that existence arrives — and, being a person, I can always change my mind once such evidence is presented.

Neither the deep personal convictions people feel, however honest, nor the lengths they will go to prove and defend them, nor the number of people who feel that way is evidence of the existence of the Judeo - Christian god.

If failure to believe that Jesus was an incarnated god will subject someone to eternal punishment, then why did the god not provide more credible evidence of his existence?

Atheists claim that faith and knowledge of, or evidence of the existence of that which faith is being placed, are incompatible.

God refuses to give evidence of his existence but demands that you believe he exists.

are still not going to provide the world with substantiated evidence of the existence of your imaginary god.

And the simple fact is that there is more evidence that hom.os.exuality is innate than there is evidence of the existence of any god.

I have tried to believe but being somewhat smart I can not wrap my head around believe in a god that I can not see or any evidence of his existence except for a motel bible.

It seems that personality one, The Father, was present in the Old Testament without evidence of the existence of personalities two, the Son, and three, The Spirit.

Saying that God must be supernatural, meaning beyond our ability to ever comprehend how he «works», then only amounts to being an excuse for there not being any objective evidence of his existence.

The physical universe in all of its wondrous complexity is the totality of all possible evidence of the existence of God.

Jesus wasn't a myth, more than enough evidence of his existence, in and outside of the Bible.

No, instead, he'll be suppressed by the entire lack of evidence of his existence.