Sentences with phrase «evidence on both sides of the issue»

However, one has to ask whether you invariably disclose relevant evidence on both sides of an issue you discuss.

Not exact matches

On one side would be all evidences of the war: conscientious chronicling of its main events — especially where religion had a bearing — coupled with articles and editorials on issues of war and peacOn one side would be all evidences of the war: conscientious chronicling of its main events — especially where religion had a bearing — coupled with articles and editorials on issues of war and peacon issues of war and peace.

B. Incorrect, dogmatic (present on both sides of the E. vs. C. issue) interpretations of either secular or scriptural evidence.

«Research» has been done on both sides of the issue, and on both sides, evidence was found to support that theory.

On the evidence side, I know that the evidence primarily comes from observational studies, and there are methodological issues with measuring dose and duration of breastfeeding particularly after the introduction of complementary foods, however the evidence is fairly consistent in showing a reduction in gastrointestinal, respiratory and ear infections (see «Breastfeeding and maternal and infant outcomes in developed countries» http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17764214).

The important distinction here is — are those on opposite sides of the issue all willing to pay attention to scientific evidence.

This is significant since at the heart of the Silver trial was evidence that the former Speaker was talking out of both sides of his mouth on this issue.

In a paper published in today's issue of Science, they present evidence that when the Isthmus of Tehuantepec in Mexico dried out, it split up dozens of bird populations that now live on either side of the dry area.

I am just curious: Even with no scientific background, how could you have missed that all the peer - reviewed research, all the real expertise, all the evidence are on one side of this issue?

Besides exposing the pros and cons of jury - based trials, «Runaway Jury» sets its sights on the relationship between firearms manufacturers and gun crime — but instead of setting forth the evidence from either side and allowing viewers to reach their own verdict on such complex issues, the film presents a highly prejudicial case, leading its audience to a conclusion that is disappointingly righteous.

Indeed, even before the verdict, members of the plaintiffs» team were talking confidently about plans to present their evidence to California Gov. Jerry Brown, a close ally of the teachers unions, to prod him into joining the reformers» side, at least on key issues such as teacher tenure.

He became concerned with such issues as: the evidence of a causal relationship between common feeding practices and serious health problems; the perceived disconnect between the nutritional requirements of felis silvestris catus and all other species of cats; an industry with a vested interest in grain as the basis for its products; a veterinary education system with little nutritional teaching, subsidized by commercial pet food industries; a questionable government concept approval and oversight process; the economic inertia of maintaining the status quo; and the rejection of science - based belief systems on the extremes of both sides of the issue.

The natural propensity of the press to give equal time to both sides of any issue, even when the evidence lies overwhelmingly on one side, can leave people confused.

The evidence is very much a secondary issue to them - they don't proceed from an evidence - based approach to the world, and they (probably correctly) judge that most people on the opposite side of the issue have very different principles than them.

The global temperature empirical evidence is so clear cut, and verified, that two of the most prominent climate scientists on opposing sides of the global warming issue agree on the science fundamentals: there has been no statistically significant warming over the last 15 years.

Until two years ago I used to teach both sides of the climate change debate and invite students to discuss the issue and reach their own conclusions based on the evidence available, I have now been stopped from doing this — apparently it confuses the students.

On the other hand, if all of the evidence admissibility issues had been sorted out before trial by motion in writing — the US system — and all of the witnesses that either side knew they might call had been available for pretrial deposition and everybody conceivably important had been examined - again the American system — then perhaps your trial and all of the other trials wouldn't have been as long, or have been resolved for whatever reason because the lawyers knew what the evidence would likely be, so there'd have been judges... etc..

In addition to providing an overview of new accident benefits arbitration process under the License Appeal Tribunal (LAT), which came into effect on April 1, 2016, Michelle will share valuable anecdotal discussion of what counsel have experienced so far on both sides, such as evidentiary and production issues at the case conference stage and before a hearing, what evidence adjudicators are looking for or emphasizing, the format of the hearing (written, oral, hybrid), witness issues, etc..

Aside from the glasses issue, Harris also argued on appeal that prosecutors wrongly shifted the burden of proof to the defense in closing and rebuttal arguments by stating that the jury had not heard two sides to the story and that «there is no evidence of innocence to undercut the United States» evidence.»

There are BCCA decisions which suggest that where the parties have lead expert evidence on the issue of factual causation — certainly where both sides do, perhaps even where just one side «leads» the evidence, the robust and pragmatic approach can not be used.