There is
evidence on both sides of this question, but in recent years we have observed moments of great deference as well as moments of judicial constraint of executive behaviour in wartime.
Not exact matches
As a scientist, I think it is important to look at
evidence on both
sides of a debate before giving an answer to a
question like this.
You are arguing based
on your opinion that the
evidence is strongly
on your
side but you still have not answered a single
question of mine to show your data to support your claims, nor have you posted any links to support your claims.
The weight
of the
evidence is very strongly
on the «No»
side of these
questions.
In your flag you put
evidence in favour
of AGW
on one
side and
evidence against
on the other — but post modern
questions are only just around the corner at any time — whose
evidence?
While Kip's quick to be sceptical
of charts and graphs — and perhaps there is a small grain
of truth to some part
of some
of Kip's
questions — but slow to furnish
evidence for such assertions as «The BIG money,
of course, is paid out and spent
on the CAGW
side and has always been.».
Although his comment suggested such, I doubt that he really believes that individual commenters here were responding because something had been «deemed urgent» by some unspecified «deemers,» and, (2) it seems to me that you might be drawing conclusions from Lewandowsky's research that (assuming you find his research methodology to be valid — which some seem to
question) are not supported by the
evidence he offered: Evidence that informs the question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent on the «skeptical» side than the «realist&raqu
evidence he offered:
Evidence that informs the question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent on the «skeptical» side than the «realist&raqu
Evidence that informs the
question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent
on the «skeptical»
side than the «realist»
side.
Once sufficient
evidence has been collected, both you and the defendant will be
questioned by lawyers
on both
sides of the case.