There's too much
evidence on his existence to deny him as a real person.
Some advocates would argue this work provides a higher level of causal
evidence on the existence of discrimination; others would argue it shows that discrimination only explains part of the gap.
Not exact matches
sam stone Given we are made in the image of God our core «DNA» (as
evidenced by 98 % of the world population) knows there is more to this
existence than chemical reaction
on organic matter.
you really need to do your research
on your boy jesus... that story is very old... and like all relgions, manifested... as for the
existence of a god... you provide any
evidence (and i mean any) then we can have a discussion... until then, your opinion is invalid... WHAT CAN BE ASSERTED WITHOUT PROOF CAN BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PROOF... HITCHENS
I have posted
on this site numerous times that while I have what I understand to be significant
EVIDENCE for the
existence of God, I can not prove it.
You can not test the
existence of things that only leave «supposed» traces of
evidence, when the
existence of such things is based
on their pervasive influence yet pervasive elusiveness that remains elusive because nobody has yet to devise a means to find it yet.
A related question but
on a more modern front is, Why can't god put up some clear modern
evidence of his
existence?
However, they have looked at many truths (facts based
on physical
evidence) and non existent physical
evidence of any God and have made a personal decision that the
existence of any God is highly improbable and defies almost all logic.
Posters
on this board constantly give
evidence as justification for
existence without purpose or design yet as you well know there is no such
evidence.
However, it does not exist based
on all
evidence and there is no such thing as non
existence in substance or concept
historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical
evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical
evidence - no remains, no proof of
existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go
on and
on... the fact is, there is not a single proving
evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no
existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it
on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...
They are all premised
on certain key beliefs for which you have no
evidence, the most critical of which is the
existence of God.
We don't see the wind, but we believe that the wind exists through indirect
evidences, i.e., leaves are moving, feeling the wind
on our skin, etc..., Seeing is believing, the empirical
evidence that we seek to prove that God exists, but the
existence of God alone does not make us a believer.
On the other hand, there is NO
EVIDENCE WHATSOVER tending to establish the
existence of a god.
While exhorting us to contemplate nature, the Qur» an says, «In the creation of skies and the earth, the difference between night and day, the ships which run at sea carrying that which is useful for mankind, the rain water which Allah sends down from the sky to revive the earth after its death, and to spread animals
on it, and the arrangement of winds and clouds between sky and earth, in all those things there are
evidences (for the
existence of God) for those who make use of their brains» (Surah II, 164).
I have reviewed all the actual
evidence for the
existence of any god that has been presented to me or that I have found and have formed the opinion, based
on the available actual
evidence, that the probability of any god existing is very small.
Granted I don't think that the burden is
on the atheist to prove the
existence of something for which no
evidence is supplied.
On the contrary, I believe there is far more compelling
evidence for the
existence of God, than against.
Further
evidence for the
existence of table - fellowship with «tax collectors and sinners» as a feature of the ministry of Jesus is the role played by communal meals in earliest Christianity (E. Lohmeyer, Lord of the Temple [ET by Stewart Todd of Kultus und Evangelism (1942); Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1961], pp. 79ff, discusses the central role of table - fellowship in the ministry of Jesus, but he is particularly concerned with the development towards the Last Supper, which he sees as historical, rather than with the relationship between this table - fellowship and the cross,
on the one hand, and the communal meals of early Christianity
on the other.)
Atheists claim that, given the inherent limitations
on human knowledge, there is no
evidence supporting the
existence of a god, and therefore we reject the claim that there is one.
But,
on a side note, science is uncovering
evidence of the possibility of life coming into
existence without the need of magic.
Just because man is able to split the atom in half and go to the moon, swim in water when man is made for land (boats), travel faster
on land (car, train) than walking, and fly when man naturally does not fly (plane)-- all that is not enough to establish that man has the capacity to understand the
evidence of God's
existence.
there is no need to be concerned for spiffy, spiffy does not exist, he appears merely as words
on a page, no
evidence of
existence whatsoever, do not be sucked into the «spiffy» con.
Nobody
on this planet can provide
evidence that proves or disproves the
existence of any diety.
Actually the «burden of proof» falls
on you to explain how an all powerful being would have to leave
evidence of it's
existence.
The final three chapters summarily consider the
evidence against and for the virgin birth, arguing that it is neither myth nor indemonstrable truth; instead the
evidence for the
existence of an historical tradition anteceding the Gospels, ultimately from Mary herself, is more credible than any alternative explanation; hence, for anyone open to the possibility of miracles, there is good
evidence to affirm Jesus» virgin birth
on the basis of the New Testament's testimony.
One way of responding to this line of thought has been to offer arguments for the
existence of God based
on what is considered
evidence acceptable to any reasonable person.
In chapter 3 of his The God Delusion published last September, Richard Dawkins included a rebuttal of «The argument [for God] from admired religious scientists,» in which he pours scorn
on the citing of eminent believing scientists (contemporary or historical) as
evidence for God's
existence.
Speaking
on a conference call with far - right pastor Rick Scarborough, Gohmert warned listeners that the nation could be coming «toward the end of [its]
existence,» as
evidenced by its leaders and citizens allegedly neglecting to remain true to biblical teachings.
Morality exists, it has foundation and
evidence for its
existence, the argument rests
on where it comes from.
Huffington Post:
Evidence Suggests Flood, Noah's Ark Existed, Says Robert Ballard, Archaeologist Who Found Titanic Robert Ballard, one of the world's most famous underwater explorers, has set his sights
on proving the
existence of one of the Bible's most well known stories.
I can't prove God's
existence just as much as scientist can't prove the big bang... there is
evidence of both but to reach a conclusion takes faith... one side leaves hope and the other does not... maybe I'm agnostic too because I don't claim to know everything about why I'm here, I have to have faith... Honestly, I'm sick of the extremes
on both sides... the conservative judgmental Christian, who never thought through things as to why the believe what they do (ie Dinosaurs, cavemen, evolution, etc.) and the intellectually arrogant atheist and humanists.
• God has never left any physical
evidence of his
existence on earth = > hmm, how about earth itself?
Even the possibility of deducing consequences from a law of nature gives no
evidence for the necessity of any coming into
existence, which is clear as soon as one reflects definitively
on coming into
existence.
But, if one reviews the
evidence for the consistency and inspiration of Scripture, along with the
evidence for the
existence, death, and resurrection of Christ, and is convinced, then one can be a Christian based
on good reason.
A belief is something you have come to based
on an active search where you you gather
evidence and then make a hypothesis changing your view from one of neutral to positive «I believe in gravity after having studied the research that has been done and my personal experience with things falling
on my head» which is different than «I disbelieve Leprechauns because there is no
evidence one way or the other as to their
existence.»
You have to bear in mind that another NYC DA pursued a felony gang assault charge against Renzo Gracie
on exponentially more flimsy
evidence for the scuffle at One Oak several years ago with video
evidence in
existence to contradict the DA's witnesses» false statements which is the only reason it abandoned those charges for a misdemeanor assault plea.
Section 11 (2) of the
Evidence Act states: «In a criminal action, the burden of producing evidence, when it is on the prosecution as to a fact which is essential to guilt, requires the prosecution to produce sufficient evidence so that on the totality of the evidence a reasonable mind could find the existence of the fact beyond a reasonable doubt
Evidence Act states: «In a criminal action, the burden of producing
evidence, when it is on the prosecution as to a fact which is essential to guilt, requires the prosecution to produce sufficient evidence so that on the totality of the evidence a reasonable mind could find the existence of the fact beyond a reasonable doubt
evidence, when it is
on the prosecution as to a fact which is essential to guilt, requires the prosecution to produce sufficient
evidence so that on the totality of the evidence a reasonable mind could find the existence of the fact beyond a reasonable doubt
evidence so that
on the totality of the
evidence a reasonable mind could find the existence of the fact beyond a reasonable doubt
evidence a reasonable mind could find the
existence of the fact beyond a reasonable doubt.»
Whereas the NPP claimed to possess
evidence of the
existence of foreigners from all neighbouring countries
on our register, they only concocted
evidence that sought to impugn the integrity of persons from the Volta Region and create the impression that people from that Region are «foreigners» who shore up the votes of the NDC in Ghanaian elections.
«It sets an unfortunate precedent for the Department of Health to consider that the
existence of a community which believes that homeopathy works is «
evidence» enough to continue spending public money
on it,» Mr Willis said.
Evidence has also been gathered of the
existence of a twilight, which would indicate the presence of a thin high air more rarefied than prevails
on our highest mountain peaks.
There is no
evidence so far of intelligent life out there and we are emitting fewer deliberate signs of our
existence (even if a few messages are still being beamed into space, such as one in the direction of the star Polaris
on 10 October 2016).
Initial projects (both theoretical and practical) include seeking
evidence for the
existence of biomolecules and cells in the upper atmosphere, as well as in comets and interstellar dust; looking for
evidence of biological molecules and processes in material recovered from space; and investigating the effect of space conditions
on living systems.
A third - century coin, recently excavated in southern England, has brought to light an unknown chapter of Roman history: the troubled reign of Domitianus, an emperor whose hold
on power was so fleeting that the only other archaeological
evidence of his
existence is a similar coin found a century ago and dismissed as a hoax.
Astronomers will be searching for direct
evidence of a ninth planet in the far reaches of the solar system; its
existence was inferred this year from its gravitational effects
on icy objects beyond Pluto.
The
existence of microbial life
on Mars remains highly controversial, but recent
evidence of water, complex organic molecules, and methane in the Martian environment, combined with findings from the 1976 Viking mission, have led to the conclusion that existing life
on Mars is a possibility that must be considered, as presented in an article in Astrobiology.
Many physicists expect to hear convincing, or near - convincing,
evidence of the Higgs»
existence on July 4, when CERN will report its latest data.
This and several other lines of
evidence point to the
existence of a mysterious form of invisible matter that exerts a gravitational influence
on other matter and outweighs ordinary matter by a factor of about 6 to 1.
Based
on the emerging
evidence for the
existence of the very interesting extreme metabolic phenotypes metabolically healthy obesity and metabolically unhealthy normal weight the scientist then studied the prevalence of the 4 at - risk phenotypes among the different BMI categories (normal weight, overweight, and obese) in subjects with NGR and prediabetes.
Scientists were already fairly confident in the ocean's
existence, based
on the moon's smooth icy surface —
evidence of past resurfacing by the ocean — and other observations by the Galileo spacecraft, which made a handful of flybys in the 1990s.