Sentences with phrase «evidence supporting this claim such»

If a borrower was in school or military within the recent two full years, he or she must provide evidence supporting this claim such as college transcripts or discharge papers.

If a borrower was in school or military within the recent two full years, he or she must provide evidence supporting this claim such as college transcripts or discharge papers.

Not exact matches

No evidence was provided to support such a claim.

There is no evidence to support such claims or need of deity in understanding nature.

I lack a belief in a god or gods because there is simply NO empirical evidence to support such a claim — for YOUR version or anyone else's.

:... still we have a ton of physical evidence that God is real...» One point of view: Most, if not all, Atheists would disagree with this statement and ask for solid scientific evidence to support such a claim.

Unfortunately for you, not only is there absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support any of these claims, the existence of any such God leads to numerous questions and apparent inconsistencies for which none of you can provide convincing answers.

We're such terrible people for not acquiescing to your superior knowledge, wisdom, and judgement without issuing a demand for evidence in support of your claims.

In point of fact Christianity is an elaborate web of such theories and claims, none of which is supported by any objective evidence.

In order to calculate the probability of a specific miracle claim with mathematical integrity, other factors such as the evidence supporting the claimed event must also be taken into account.

I don't believe a god or gods exist because there is no evidence to support such a claim.

First, Wickman claims that this discovery «has significant implications for the Judeo - Christian worldview, offering strong support for biblical beliefs» because «this new evidence strongly suggests that there was a beginning to our universe», and according to Wickman, any such beginning «sounds a lot like» Genesis 1:1's claim that God did it.

Atheists believe that ALL claims must be supported by objective evidence, and that we are obligated to withhold belief until such evidence is presented.

Offering specious arguments such as in the article to support that... claiming there's evidence of that when there isn't... that offends.

Because the claims of Darwinism are presented to the public as «science,» most people are under the impression that they are supported by direct evidence such as experiments and fossil record studies.

It is widely claimed that the globalization of production helps to cut costs, and that (as long as gains are not outweighed by transport costs) everybody benefits; the truth of such claims is also strenuously challenged, and there is strong evidence that the real beneficiaries are powerful, wealthy, western countries, and the transnational companies they support.

It's ironic because you said that creationist have no evidence to support their claims but you mentioned organizations that find such evidence And again their point is that history and science will not contradict the Bible

You can say there is evidence to support biblical claims, such as a building in ruins that proves some of the historical writings.

You believe you will live for ever after death, with zero evidence to support such a preposterous claim.

«The draft orders and supporting submissions filed by the TWU and [National Union of Workers] fail to provide any substantive evidence or analysis to support the existence of such cogent links between claims and safety outcomes.»

Unfortunately, such claims must be relegated to the domain of gardening lore because of the lack of scientific evidence to support them.

That may well be the case if you are very fortunate but the reality is that widely - held beliefs such as a firm mattress is always better if you suffer from a bad back are not actually supported by any overwhelming medical evidence to support the claim.

However, you will need to provide evidence to support your claims, such as text messages, voice mails, and witness accounts.

Matt, in the article Dr. Amy says «THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire speciesEVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species&SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species&rCLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire speciesevidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire speciesevidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species&support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species&rclaims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species».

-1 If you're going to make such significant leaps in judgment as stated in your third paragraph, you'll need significant evidence that supports the claim.

BASC has previously been in contact with both the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) and the Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) and when asked, neither organisation could produce the evidence to support such claims.»

Although the work provided some evidence supporting the claim that Colombian planes had failed to respect the limit, Mena did not feel that the results were sufficiently certain for him to testify at The Hague, because parameters such as the height and velocity of the Colombian planes were unknown.

Based on the evidence available to date, there is no evidence in support of such claims and plenty of reason to be skeptical of them.

As a result of this study, HD 284149 ABb therefore becomes the latest addition to the (short) list of brown dwarfs on wide circumbinary orbits, providing new evidence to support recent claims that object in such configuration occur with a similar frequency to wide companions to single stars.

Our food regulatory body, FSANZ (Food Standards Australia and New Zealand), will only allow such a health claim after they have decided that there is enough scientific evidence supporting this, so it's safe to say that we're going the right way by tucking into oats as part of our regular diet.

Though some proponents of agave nectar say that it doesn't cause blood sugar spikes, scientific evidence doesn't support such claims.

No, there isn't clinical evidence to support such a claim.

The plant is also used topically to treat skin conditions such as eczema, and folk traditions claim it can be used as a hangover cure and aphrodisiac, although little scientific evidence exists to support such uses.

Although there are numerous claimed benefits of using probiotic supplements, such as maintaining gastrointestinal health, in part by lowering risk of and severity of constipation or diarrhea, and improving immune health, including lower risk of and severity of acute upper respiratory tract infections, i.e., the common cold, such claims are not all supported by sufficient clinical evidence.

Yet the evidence Ginsburg musters to support such claims falls well short of its mark.

I wanted to know how I could scaffold writing activities such that students could use relevant evidence to support powerful claims.

They'll also work toward curriculum standards such as mastery of language conventions, appropriate word choice, providing specific evidence to support claims, and more.

Writing Task The Lesson Level Learning Goal for this task is: Construct and present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support the claim that activities such as deforestation or reforestation can cause changes in the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

There is, however, no evidence to support such claims.

We're trying to do new and different things, such as synthesize information across standards, clusters and domains in math, or draw evidence from text to support a claim in ELA, so we want to be able to report how they're working.

It's no surprise that the authors of the report offer no evidence to support such a sweeping claim.

[Response: There is no synthesis of evidence that supports your claims of such a large change at the Maunder Min.

Gavin Says: «There is no synthesis of evidence that supports your claims of such a large change at the Maunder Min.

You have however made claims that are simply not true such as the correlation of the aa index to global temperature; and you claim this as evidence to support your assumptions; and you still apparently don't understand forcing.

All the evidence such as the recent lull in Atlantic hurricane activity supports their claims.

While members of the HF have many times called me a liar they have very rarely made any specific claims that something I wrote was wrong, and have never supplied convincing evidence in support of such claims.

I can't find ANY evidence to support such a claim, unless you are willing to use the highly adjusted temperature data created by the Team, using secret data and secret methods.

However, when I'm asked to BELIEVE that the world is headed to a catastrophic warming due to the wrong - doings of us industrialized societies and that we need to do something now to stop the disasters, I'm faced with several problems: - More often than not, when I've tried to analyse the concrete evidence to support such claims I have found logical inconsistencies or severe uncertainties that you don't need to be an expert to perceive.

There is no empirical evidence to support such a claim, but that hasn't stopped the leftists / liberals / progressives / Democrats from lying to the public about this issue.

With the CCC being responsible for informing decisions with consequences for policy decades into the future, it reflects very badly on the CCC that its Chair routinely makes such uncompromising, and unfounded claims in public, which can not be supported with evidence, apparently to defend the CCC's advice to Parliament from criticism.