Sentences with phrase «evidence supports a category»

These are capitalized because the evidence supports a category of evolutionarily homologous experiences, equivalent across different species of mammals.

Not exact matches

«The evidence for the Catholic Church's support of science might be put in three categories.

Davis used his first interview as Shadow Home Secretary in November 2003 to state his personal support for a reintroduction of the death penalty for people convicted of multiple murder «where there is clear evidence and no doubt» surrounding the offender's guilt, citing «Yorkshire Ripper» Peter Sutcliffe and Moors Murderer Ian Brady as examples of offenders who would fall into this category.

Race is a political grouping created to support slavery and colonialism, and its boundary lines have shifted over time and across nations to suit political ends... For the last three centuries, science... has been instrumental in justifying the concept of biological races — and this century's genomic science is no different... Despite the scientific and political evidence, some scientists are attempting to modernize the myth that race is a biological category... What's new is that today's racial science claims to divide human beings into natural groups with more accurate precision and without the taint of racism.»

IES could support states by offering guidance on how they might review and approve interventions meeting the top - three evidence categories.

To support my case, I presented three categories of evidence: (1) the fact that national reform groups seem deeply concerned about Detroit; (2) the similarity in performance between the city's charter and traditional public schools; and (3) the large negative effects of two statewide voucher programs on student outcomes.

Clearly Congress did not intend for the fourth category within its definition to serve as a permanent justification for a program to be considered evidence - based, but rather hoped to increase the supply of programs with empirical support.

Crucially, for many purposes the law also treats as evidence - based a fourth category comprising activities that have a research - based rationale but lack direct empirical support — provided, that is, that they are accompanied by «ongoing efforts to examine the effects» of the activity on important student outcomes.

The level of evidence supporting the idea will determine which category is most appropriate.

This rating indicates that while the CSRQ Center found some evidence of effectiveness, more rigorous research and evidence needs to be conducted on this model to fully support its effectiveness or quality on the category reviewed.

Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire consequences of man - made global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.

In response, the first category attempts to provide evidence to support the above - stated AGW premise, whether from recent climate change or from paleo - climate studies.

A good lawyer will seek every category of damages that applies to your case, and find ways to support those damages with evidence that will be admissible in court.

Much of the available review evidence only addresses predetermined categories of interventions (eg, group, 10 psychological, 11 media15), and do not address other potentially important parent and family support functions such as social support, chronic illness education and skill development or support with relevant common parenting issues.

It remains unclear whether severe irritability should be declared a disorder or seen as the extreme of a spectrum.16 Empirical evidence supports chronic irritability as a continuum; however, clinical decisions require thresholds and binary disease categories are commonly used for such purposes in many other disorders.

As to paragraph 8 of Form 4 it was held by French J (as President of the Tribunal) in Waanyi Peoples» Native Title Application (1994) 129 ALR 100) in relation to Form 1 under the old Native Title Act provisions relating to a claim for native title determination, that an «outline of the type of evidence» which the applicant will produce to the Tribunal to support its claim did not require a description of the content of such evidence but rather «a listing of its categories».