Sentences with phrase «evidence than any god»

That is more physical evidence than any god claimed in the history of mankind.

Not exact matches

Hence putting forth any answer without evidence, including «god», rather than saying «we don't know» is pretty intellectually dishonest.

I'm curious, what other reason would you have for a lack of belief in god other than there is no evidence of a god??

sam stone Given we are made in the image of God our core «DNA» (as evidenced by 98 % of the world population) knows there is more to this existence than chemical reaction on organic matter.

No one says that — what they say are» - there is no room for God in explaining the universe, so that is not evidence for your god — prophesies are not proven to be more than coincidences, so that is not evidence for your god» etc. etGod in explaining the universe, so that is not evidence for your god — prophesies are not proven to be more than coincidences, so that is not evidence for your god» etc. etgod — prophesies are not proven to be more than coincidences, so that is not evidence for your god» etc. etgod» etc. etc..

You said, «Since I believe in the God of the Bible and not in Thor, I believe that there is more evidence for the former than for the latter.

Since I believe in the God of the Bible and not in Thor, I believe that there is more evidence for the former than for the latter.

Those explanations provide a lot more empirical evidence than, «It just is,» or «Because the book of God says so.»

If evidence emerges, then of course that sentiment will change, but until there is proof, there is no reason to believe that your god is any more real than Zeus or Thor.

Rather than saying «I / we don't know» he claimed «some god did it» without presenting any actual evidence.

Do you believe in any creature for which there is no evidence, other than your god?

I see no evidence to support your god or any gods existence and until I do see said evidence, there is no reason to accept it as anything more than fiction.

With faith in your heart, you do not need to pursue proof or empirical evidence through human means which you will never find because God Is Spirit, thus, so much greater than mortal men which He created who have limited knowledge.

There is more than substantial evidence that the bible and therefore the biblical jesus and his daddy were man - made frauds based on the other imaginary gods that came before.

What evidence do you have that your god is better than the others?

1 Paul appealed to the evidence around him that God created all things 2 Paul spoke of Gods kindness in providing all their needs 3 This God is different than the statues and idols they worshiped in vain that are empty vs. the living God In Romans 1:19 Paul said: «God has made it plain to them.

I understand your point, but even athiests admit there is some evidence for the bible and Christ, altough they do not believe in a god or that Christ was anyting more than an average man.

made Since there is only evidence that men made your bible, complete with many, many flaws, it is far more likely that your book is part of the deception of men, than any gods having anything to do with it.

FairySea, there is more evidence for the Loch Ness Monster than there is for God, and evidence is not proof.

And so the evidence that Christians continue to present as «proof» of their god is either the earliest fragments of these same man - written stories (proving nothing other than that someone wrote the stories down!)

There is no more evidence for an afterlife than there is for a god.

Nonimus @anonmormoninidaho,»... even athiests admit there is some evidence for the bible and Christ, altough they do not believe in a god or that Christ was anyting more than an average man.

You stopped believing in Santa Claus when you were 6, time to stop believing in gods too (and there's even more evidence for Santa Claus than a deity lol)

What is your evidence, Theo, that the ancient writings, many of which are of unknown authorship, that, for some, represent alleged «Word of God», represent anything other than opinion / hearsay accounting?

I'm more than willing to believe in God if I see any evidence of his existence.

«Now there is no indication that such an opinion is automatically incorrect, but as far as empirical evidence is concerned, that opinion is just that, an opinion, and it is no more solidly based than those who are of the opinion that there is a God who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop faith»

Indeed, there is more evidence that hom.ose.xuality is innate than there is evidence to support the existence of any god.

In any case, no scientist, elite or otherwise, has found any scientific evidence for God's existence, so the basis for their belief in a god has no different than anyone elseGod's existence, so the basis for their belief in a god has no different than anyone elsegod has no different than anyone else's.

«Look at the trees» is not evidence of your god, any more than it's evidence of Zeus.

By the way, the Bible is no more evidence for the existence of God than Juius Leblanc Stewart's painting «Nude in the Forest» is evidence that women actually stand around nude in the forest.

Evidence can demonstrate that God's existence is more plausible than it would have been without that eEvidence can demonstrate that God's existence is more plausible than it would have been without that evidenceevidence.

Chiefly, this means that passages traditional interpreters have employed to argue that the initial aim is derived from the Consequent Nature of God rather than the Primordial Nature alone fail to provide evidence for this view

There is more evidence that god was an extra terrertrial than some devine being.

No evidence of Adam and Eve or hell or heaven or god or satan... just stories meant to fool the weak of heart and gullible... stories to make you feel like you're less of a person than you are.

There is more evidence that being gay is innate than there is evidence of any god.

Yep, the big bang, with all its evidence, is much more absurd than a god who «speaks» everything into existence.

Why play the holier than thou card when your own book of stories is immoral and your imaginary friend (aka god) can't be shown with evidence to exist?

When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.

Discussing at length three biological structures that ID supporters cite as evidence of «irreducible complexity» (and therefore the need, they say, for divine intervention), Collins shows how ID remains no more than a modern version of a «god of the gaps» hypothesis, which posits a «clumsy Creator, having to intervene at regular intervals to fix the inadequacies of His own initial plan for generating the complexity of life» and therefore completely unsatisfactory.

@Alex Most atheists here have openly stated that the existence of a god or gods is logically possible, but the total lack of empirical evidence for any god, let alone the very specific gods of torah, bible, koran, etc, is more than a little suspi - cious.

On the contrary, I believe there is far more compelling evidence for the existence of God, than against.

Lastly, I can honestly admit that if proven wrong today, tomorrow, or in the future and someone gave me empiracle evidence that god exists, that gravity is not constant on earth, that the sun IS actually revolving around us and not the other way around, I would be more than happy to revise my current view of the universe around me and change accordingly.

I think I can provide more verifiable evidence to support the hypothesis that love exists than you can to support the hypothesis that your god exists.

For example, if a god believer would require more evidence of ownership before purchasing a house or gemstone than they require of their god belief, then that's just stupid, and the believer needs to realize this horrible bias they employ.

It is no more evidence for the existence of the Judeo Christian god than it is evidence for the existence of Azura Mazda, Angus, Belenos, Brigid, Dana, Lugh, Dagda, Epona, Allah Aphrodite, Apollo, Ares, Artemis, Atehna, Demeter, Dionysus, Eris, Eos, Gaia, Hades, Hekate, Helios, Hephaestus, Hera, Hermes, Hestia, Pan, Poseidon, Selene, Uranus, Zeus, Mathilde, Elves, Eostre, Frigg, Ganesh, Hretha, Saxnot, Shef, Shiva Thuno, Tir, Vishnu, Weyland, Woden, Alfar, Balder, Beyla, Bil, Bragi, Byggvir, Dagr, Disir, Eir, Forseti, Freya, Freyr, Frigga, Heimdall, Hel, Hoenir, Idunn, Jord, Lofn, Loki, Mon, Njord, Norns, Nott, Odin, Ran, Saga, Sif, Siofn, Skadi, Snotra, Sol, Syn, Ull, Thor, Tyr, Var, Vali, Vidar, Vor, Herne, Holda, Nehalennia, Nerthus, Endovelicus, Ataegina, Runesocesius, Apollo, Bacchus, Ceres, Cupid, Diana, Janus, Juno, Jupiter, Maia, Mars, Mercury, Minerva, Neptune, Pluto, Plutus, Proserpina, Venus, Vesta, Vulcan, Attis, Cybele, El - Gabal, Isis, Mithras, Sol Invictus, Endovelicus, Anubis, Aten, Atum, Bast, Bes, Geb, Hapi, Hathor, Heget, Horus, Imhotep, Isis, Khepry, Khnum, Maahes, Ma'at, Menhit, Mont, Naunet, Neith, Nephthys, Nut, Osiris, Ptah, Ra, Sekhmnet, Sobek, Set, Tefnut, Thoth, An, Anshar, Anu, Apsu, Ashur, Damkina, Ea, Enki, Enlil, Ereshkigal, Nunurta, Hadad, Inanna, Ishtar, Kingu, Kishar, Marduk, Mummu, Nabu, Nammu, Nanna, Nergal, Ninhursag, Ninlil, Nintu, Shamash, Sin, Tiamat, Utu, Mitra, Amaterasu, Susanoo, Tsukiyomi, Inari, Tengu, Izanami, Izanagi, Daikoku, Ebisu, Benzaiten, Bishamonten, Fukurokuju, Jurojin, Hotei, Quetzalcoatl, Tlaloc, Inti, Kon, Mama Cocha, Mama Quilla, Manco Capac, Pachacamac or Zaramama

those who have already decided that God does not exist and that all processes must have a naturalistic explanation, do not see the obvious evidence that the universe was designed, rather than happened by chance.

That most people believe in gods is no more evidence for the existence of gods than the belief that the earth was flat is evidence for its shape.

No one has more «pure bias» than one who believes in mystical beings (gods) without evidence (christians, muslims, hindus, etc).

There is more factual evidence for recent violence by christians than there is for any god, The Babble or the jesus myth.

This evidence doesn't support your god's existence OR being the one actually start the universe any more than it proves Odin's, Quetzlcoatl's, Ra's, Kronos's, or Ahura Mazda's existence or claims of starting the universe.