Sentences with phrase «evidence than the conservative»

He refers to the nuclear debate as»... a natural experiment in the politicization of science,» and optimistically bets that anti-nuclear liberals will be more open minded and respectful of the scientific evidence than conservatives.

Not exact matches

 But now it seems that 2 months of positive data is more than enough to conclusively declare the recession over — and, for Conservative politicians, more evidence that their plan is «working.»

This article is evidence that illegal immigrants are probably smarter than conservative white citizens.

The Barna Research Group, an evangelical Christian organization that does surveys and research to better understand what Christians believe and how they behave, studied divorce rates in America in 1999 and found surprising evidence that divorce is far lower among atheists than among conservative Christians — exactly the opposite of what they were probably expecting.

Along more conservative lines, a distinguished German scholar, Martin Noth, has recently proposed and presented evidence for a more ancient source than J (he does not commit himself as to whether it was an oral or written source) underlying both J and E and utilized by both.

While he admits that Solzhenitsyn has a romantic «conservative view of nations, holding that their allure lies in their «mystical nature,» Mahoney cites considerable evidence indicating that Solzhenitsyn views nations as spiritual and cultural entities rather than racial organisms, as Fascist ideology does.

This is particularly in evidence at the moment and we typically find that 10 % fewer Labour than Conservative voters are certain to vote.

There is evidence of an interactive effect in the case of the Conservative / Liberal equation: it seems that among poll watchers, and only among them, the propensity to vote Conservative rather than Liberal was related to the gap between the two parties in the most recent poll.

By the same token, the evidence of a national will to bring in proportional representation is one thing — but it will be more willingly accepted, especially by a Conservative government that shows little appetite for reform, if this change to the British Constitution comes through evolution rather than revolution.

[108] There is evidence of this commitment to cutting the state in his party's manifesto, with Osborne and the Conservatives seeking to cut the deficit «faster and deeper» than any other main party as well as committing to various tax cuts such as inheritance tax and national insurance.

On current evidence, the SNP could return 30 - 50 MPs on 3 - 4 % of the UK vote, and these MPs will be much more inclined to work with Labour than the Conservatives (something recent Conservative attack ads will only have encouraged).

And in evidence that the Conservatives are serious about «knowing the enemy», Conservative voters are more likely to correctly identify the Labour shadow cabinet than Labour voters.

Nevertheless, if the Conservatives are serious about their manifesto commitment of continuing «to seek agreement on a comprehensive package of party funding reform», there is further evidence that it needs to happen sooner rather than later.

Not necessarily — a negative anti-government vote counts just the same as a positive vote when it goes in a ballot box and the evidence from 2010 suggests that a large proportion of Conservative voters were driven more by anti-Labour feeling than support for the Tories.

So there is evidence of an exodus from Ukip to the Conservatives, but the figure is far lower than Conservatives would like.

The last time any government won a by - election was in 1983, and with Labour considerably behind in the nationwide polls and Corbyn's popularity low, a gain in either seat would be a remarkable victory for the Conservatives and further evidence that they are dominating the post-Brexit political landscape (though, as Matt Singh points out on NumberCruncherPolitics, it would be even more remarkable than this).

«There has never been more powerful evidence about the need for private school choice than the data that are coming out about public school choice,» says Clint Bolick, vice president of the Institute for Justice, a conservative legal group.

«Going where the evidence points,» as one conservative journal claims it does in its editorial mission statement, requires more sifting for bias than ever.

It's more stylish than its kin but still on the conservative side.There's a wraparound air dam up front, a deck - lid spoiler in back and a trace of plastic cladding over the rocker panels from wheel well to wheel well, but it takes «Intercooled multivalve DOHC» lettering along the front quarter panel to give onlookers more visible evidence this isn't an ordinary Spirit sedan.

But with such a limited understanding of how the climate actually works, I (and Carl Hauser) prefer a more conservative prior distribution which allows for that possibility, assuming it actually is found through Bayesian analysis of the evidence collected later than 1959.

So, the evidence is overwhelming that on average, liberals are more Open to Experience (a personality trait) than conservatives (see here / / sites.duke.edu/niou/files/2011/06/gerber-huber-etal.pdf).

For evidence of Solomon's strange stance on environmental issues, one need look no further than his comments in the conservative National Review where he argued that the Kyoto Protocol, an international treaty dedicated to reducing carbon emissions, was «the single biggest threat to the global environment.»

As for the amount of the bet, look at the paleontological evidence for when temperatures were about 3 C higher than preindustrial levels, find the difference in sea levels, call it a conservative 1 meter, now total the world property values for the land that is less than 1 meter above sea level and see how much that is.

Thus, your determination that Dan's interpretation of the evidence is biased by his priors (when he says that the manifestation of these phenomena isn't disproportional in one ideology group as opposed to another) whereas your interpretation of the evidence to show that Republicans, conservatives, and «skeptics» are less prone to these phenomena (in an issue where they are highly identified, no less) seems more than just a tad ironic.

A new study suggesting that Arctic ice is melting faster than IPCC forecasts has been reported by the BBC as evidence that the IPCC is too conservative.

This exemplifies how so many conservatives are unserious and clueless about scientific issues in general and climate change in particular, more interested in egos than evidence.

And there is no better example of the Conservatives» disdain for evidence - based criminal justice policy than mandatory minimum sentences.

That is far different and far more conservative than the bold view deemed necessary by the LRCC's Report on Evidence and its contained Evidence Code published in December 1975.

If you were looking for evidence that some people take privacy pretty seriously, look no further than the situation that has befallen Cheryl Gallant, a Conservative candidate for Member of Parliament for Renfew - Nipissing - Pembrooke.