Sentences with phrase «evidence we've heard so»

Not exact matches

«I think, given the extraordinary evidence we've heard so far today, it is absolutely astonishing that Mark Zuckerberg is not prepared to submit himself to questioning in front of a parliamentary or congressional hearing, given these are questions of fundamental importance and concern to his users, as well as to this inquiry,» Damian Collins, the member of parliament heading the UK committee, said earlier on Tuesday.

So, in the absence of testimony, evidence, hearings, and similar niceties, the Seattle Times really had no choice but to go ahead and destroy Brock Adams on its own.

So basically, you heard a story you liked and decided to believe that story, regardless of the fact that no evidence actually supports that story.

Of course, I don't think you want proof, so you foolishly keep asking for evidence you refuse to review.You only want to believe a book that tells you what you want to hear.

I myself recalled having heard a number of Dallas faculty members and graduates in recent years distance themselves from «hardline» dispensationalism, reducing C. I. Scofield's highly articulated framework to virtually two principles: the literal reading of the text is to be preferred unless strong evidence indicates otherwise, and Israel and the church remain distinct in biblical chronology (and so in eschatology) to the end.

The signs are that the Catholic Church will at least make its voice heard when the Bill comes to be debated in the Commons: but any hope that the C of E will come up to scratch seems, on the evidence so far available, dubious to say the least.

I wanted to also add what I've heard is that animals eat their placenta to get rid of evidence so predictors don't come after them.

«The court heard strong evidence that at least five people were in the group that killed Stephen and so the guilty verdict of only two people, however welcome, can only be partial justice.

«We have consistently requested an early date for this evidence, so that parliament could be better informed of the government's approach to the discussions taking place and so that ministers could hear the views of the committee.»

«I heard Tim Farron speak earlier and Nick Clegg said this to me as well, they are flabbergasted that essentially we are in a situation where a man... where the allegations and the evidence have now been thoroughly tested and have actually been found to be credible, so nobody is suggesting that they think we are lying.»

The time available for these hearings is limited so contact the People's Inquiry if you wish to attend or submit oral evidence to the panel.

She added: «I heard Tim Farron speak earlier and Nick Clegg said this to me as well, they are flabbergasted that essentially we are in a situation where a man... where the allegations and the evidence have now been thoroughly tested and have actually been found to be credible, so nobody is suggesting that they think we are lying.»

It's unclear what the document was, but Manhattan federal Judge Valerie Caproni closed her courtroom during a hearing last week so that lawyers could argue about whether unknown sensitive evidence could be admitted at trial.

The hearing provided the most formal legal test yet of whether fMRI lie detection meets the so - called Daubert standard for admitting evidence in federal court, and as such it could set an important precedent.

The debate became so heated at one point that Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D — Ohio), who called the hearing, snapped at Hoover for interrupting David Carpenter, director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany, State University of New York, as he argued there was enough evidence to warrant more scrutiny and a government warning of potential damage.

This was the message I heard at the Forensic Science Research Evaluation Workshop held May 26 — 27 at the AAAS headquarters in Washington, D.C. I spoke about pseudoscience but then listened in dismay at how the many fields in the forensic sciences that I assumed were reliable (DNA, fingerprints, and so on) in fact employ unreliable or untested techniques and show inconsistencies between evaluators of evidence.

So there is evidence that the birds can bounce back, and the team's modelling indicates that they will very probably try to adapt to their changing circumstances by colonisation Bouvet Island, and by increasing their numbers on Heard and South Georgia islands, which should benefit from improved foraging conditions as the APF edges ever poleward.

Current users of the book have said: «this is groundbreaking stuff... so simple and so powerful...», «I feel stronger because I know what to ask about the evidence... any evidence», «my primary colleagues love this book... now we bounce off each other and have become a great school», «Dr Slater is a real living teacher and I think a modern day maverick... as soon as I hear words like «the evidence says...» I use what I got from this book...» «I want the best from my students, my staff and myself and....

We want to hear about the very best practise so that we can recommend only the most effective policy in Westminster» To give evidence to the Skills Commission, please visit the inquiry page here http://www.policyconnect.org.uk/sc/lifes-inquiry

The parliamentarians heard evidence about children who existed on a diet of crisps and others who were so hungry that they were unable to take part in a football tournament, because «their bodies simply gave up».

Anecdotal evidence: I'm using NPV in my own personal finance planning, so I'd be very interested in hearing out alternative theoretical perspectives.

If, upon hearing the evidence and testimony of the parties and their witnesses, the committee shall sustain the charges, it may suspend the defendant from the privileges of membership in the Club for a period not exceeding six months from the date of the decision, except that a defendant so suspended shall be permitted to pay dues owed during such suspension.

We know that most dogs have a superior sense of hearing and smell, but the bloodhound is so trustworthy that it is the only dog whose evidence is admissible even in court in the U.S.

I've also heard anecdotal evidence that the show floor is so quiet that you can get cell signal.

no more season's my opinion is no this game will continue to evolve evidence is the survey it over 9000 people took for the future of Killer instinct is in the hands of the community they hear us same situation with the limited edition Shadow Jago figure about the two colors but there are people out there that don't even have internet or don't have no access to the internet so this is good in terms of Making the fan base grow I am always positive meaning there might be a season 4 who knows predictions might be a sequel in the words but who knows I just hope I made some valid points if anybody wants to discuss it with me feel free to do so

For many years, I heard smokers say that the evidence about smoking and illness was hooey, that «scientists» weren't sure, that their grandpappy smoked until he died at 90 and so forth, I heard all kinds of claims about the granola police and the rest, and this was fed by the same crowd, by so called «scientists» working for tobacco companies, and the tobacco state politicians who fought every regulation and report tooth and nail and claimed it was all liberal propoganda and the like.

* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change

So... the snowy weather had to be turned into evidence of a «warmer» climate, that's when we started to hear that cold snowy winter «weather» is exactly what climate change «looks» like.

(As propaganda depends on quantity and repetition... The truth just needs to be heard by a thinking mind...) So truthful questions and truthful evidence and truthful doubts and truthful counter points are attacked, vilified (usually «attack the messenger»), deleted, and drowned out in a flood of non-sequitur and appeal to authority arguments... (Another useful tool, btw, is just to measure the number of Logical Fallacies vs correct logical syllogisms... the more LF the more it's propaganda... the more correct logical syllogisms, data included btw, the less propaganda and the more honest science... but I haven't named that thought tool yet... Perhaps the LF Ratio?

The fact is that this idea is a misconception and the so called evidence we constantly hear is simply based on fallacious arguments.

So far we've heard some good anecdotal evidence from a few sources, but not enough to be sure if it really performs better than expected.

Let's also hear from loonies of the precautionary environmentalist side — the ones who had quite enough evidence in 1990 that AGW was a problem and would likely lead to many problems including increased storms (heat energy could become kinetic energy, they reasoned), so let's start turning off lights not in use & a myriad of other measures that not only save the earth but save us money.

But, in extradition hearings, the court can not discount dubious evidence and so, based on the problematic handwriting analysis, Diab was committed to custody to await surrender to France.

We heard extensive evidence of the tangible benefits to victims and the role of restorative justice in reducing reoffending, so it clearly benefits wider society as well.»

I, generally, do not represent injured workers on appeal when I did not represent them at the hearing because I need to have my evidence, facts, and exhibits put together at the hearing level so I have a basis for the appeal.

To recover damages for a claim under this statute, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant engaged in a deceptive or unfair business practice, which was so severe that it «rises to a level of rascality» which would «shock the conscience» of a judge or juror hearing evidence.

The defendant gave evidence that the crash was so minor that «he did not hear any impact».

In both trials, the accused parents were found not guilty, albeit for different reasons, perhaps surpringsly so based on media accounts (but not apparently too surprising for the respective jurors who sat through weeks of testimony hearing all of the evidence).

The lower court's findings were «particularly problematic» given they were based so on contested affidavit evidence and without the benefit of a full hearing, said the ruling.

The complainant did not look due to fear, so her evidence was based on what she heard and felt, not on what she perceived visually.

so LAT adjudicator stated — at the FINAL hearing: «Tarion does not wish to give up their tactical advantage...» «Tarion must be given a chance to present evidence and submissions.»

In addition to providing an overview of new accident benefits arbitration process under the License Appeal Tribunal (LAT), which came into effect on April 1, 2016, Michelle will share valuable anecdotal discussion of what counsel have experienced so far on both sides, such as evidentiary and production issues at the case conference stage and before a hearing, what evidence adjudicators are looking for or emphasizing, the format of the hearing (written, oral, hybrid), witness issues, etc..

Record all evidence, including issues with an employee advertising a conflicting business, so that it can be provided at a hearing

AE's counsel described the hearings on the applications with much of the evidence being closed and so outside the knowledge of AE and his legal advisers as being «Kafkaesque» and grossly unfair to AE without it coming anywhere near satisfying the requirements of Art 6.

30 Although defence counsel may well run the risk of having evidence of an accused viewed as tainted when testifying after hearing other defence witnesses testify, I do not in this case find that Mr. Pasloski's evidence should be so characterized.

But because the consequences are so severe, she wrote, the sanction of forfeiture should not be imposed until the defendant has had a full and fair opportunity at a hearing to offer evidence as to the totality of the circumstances that may bear on the question.»

However, different considerations may apply where there is relevant fresh evidence that was not available at the date of the hearing, or a change in the law, and so this principle has no application where there is a change in circumstances or there are new events after the date of the decision.

The defendant asserted that, without some medical evidence there was nothing to suggest that the claimant's hearing loss was noise induced as opposed to constitutional given his age; it would be disproportionate to require the defendant to go to the expense to retrieve the records when the proposed claim was so speculative.

Furthermore, it did so without holding an oral hearing and did not invite the parties to address the matter or consider any further evidence or expert opinion.

Such evidence would not of course suffice at trial; but in my view it does afford sufficient reason to believe that the appellant may indeed have suffered hearing loss, and that, if so, it may have been caused by the fact that he worked for many years in a very noisy environment.