Sentences with phrase «evidence without any bias»

James, if you had the courage to look at the evidence without bias, you'd not be making the claims you do and suggesting that the bias problem is with others.

«Whilst the possibility of this is extremely low, possibly even zero, as scientists it's important that we avoid complacency and examine observations and evidence without bias.»

This describing just sets forth the objective evidence without any bias, and since the ultimate truth is, any child's play is just worthy and fine as it is, the child tends to conclude just that, that he is just fine the way he is.

Not exact matches

«People are claiming that they can train away biases,» Greenwald says, «[They're] making those claims without evidence.»

It does not stand up to scrutiny without such confirmation bias, and there is no evidence that you can produce to support your absurd beliefs.

Without the ability to subjective evidence to external subjective scrutiny there is no way to know it's anything more than confirmation bias or even delusion.

No one has more «pure bias» than one who believes in mystical beings (gods) without evidence (christians, muslims, hindus, etc).

But it's really a process that, as a core foundation, is based on providing evidence - based information, clinical judgment and expertise without a bias, and clear outlines of risks and benefits and alternatives, including doing nothing in any given situation.

The study results show that participants are bound to a «false - consensus» bias, i.e. they believe without evidence that the attitudes of others resemble their own.

Although reanalysis of the available evidence is important, the ability to properly control for bias and confounding [factors that can influence outcomes] in observational studies is often limited, and without randomized controlled trials specifically designed to test the hypothesis, the issue of nonspecific effects of vaccines may remain subject to continuing debate.»

Firstly when a so called science paper alleges bias and political activism and without any evidence it deserves to be rubbish binned pretty fast.

Here we have a post written by a climate scientist in order to complain about the biasing effect of a politicization of climate science, in which she openly embraces an analysis that presents a completely politicized picture of science, without even a cursory attempt to present objectively collected and analyzed evidence in support..

As an example of an objective engineer's presentation of global warming data, and a typical engineer's reaction to it without panic or fear mongering, I recommend Burt Rutan's global temperature presentation, what we should be doing now in the face of this evidence, and critique of biased data presenters at: http://rps3.com/Files/AGW/EngrCritique.AGW-Science.v4.pdf

Do you really think that it is likely that you are without the reasoning biases that incline you to filter data and evidence so as to confirm your preconceptions?

On the surface, however, there is good evidence that at least one reviewer had a biased opinion (with or without legitimate gripes, his statement clearly indicates a bias), and at least some anecdotal evidence that the editor chose to let this color his decision.

There is overwhelming evidence that law firms and their inhabitants can not act without the influence of bias, even when combined with the best of intentions

Jury instructions typically leave the jury with wide discretion in choosing amounts, and the presentation of evidence of a defendant's net worth creates the potential that juries will use their verdicts to express biases against big businesses, particularly those without strong local presences.

Figures from the American Bar Association state that 88 % of all lawyers are white, and there is overwhelming evidence that law firms and their inhabitants can not act without the influence of bias, even when combined with the best of intentions.

The judge must hear your case, your evidence and all that you and the other lawyer or the other party have to say without bias and without favouring either you or the other party.

He has turned an arbitration over his termination during the probationary period of his employment in 1999 into a legal battle that apparently continues today, including allegations of bias against members of the BC Labour Relations Board (which were noted as being without merit), a Statement of Claim against the BC Attorney General (and others) which was dismissed as an abuse of process, and the attempted swearing of two informations against a vice chair of the BC LRB (which the court found there was no evidence to support).

(correct test for Barrister appeals; whether outside the ex improviso rule, prosecutor may call evidence after prosecution and defence case closed; use of debarring orders against prosecutor; whether tribunal may «enter the arena» and strongly request the attendance of a prosecution witness; whether BSB has power to summons witnesses; whether prosecutor may communicate with disciplinary judge behind the back of the defence; whether such communication redolent of actual bias of judge where judge wishes prosecutor good luck on appeal; whether apparent bias doctrine can be engaged by post-trial conduct of judge; legal effect of serving BSB prosecutions department officer being 1 of 4 appointing members of the COIC «Tribunals Appointments Body» (TAB); whether TAB ultra vires the Bar's Constitutions; whether open - ended power of removal of member of COIC pool without cause, unlawful given position of BSB Chair and senior staff on COIC; whether ECHR Article 6 guarantees against pressure on disciplinary judges to conform with a prosecutorial mentality; whether disciplinary judges Art. 6 «independent» within Findlay v United Kingdom given key role of BSB prosecutions department in appointing disciplinary judges; serious non-disclosure by BSB of notes of secret meeting between BSB and disciplinary judge until day before appeal and despite requests and application for disclosure by defence)

The fact that the chair of the discipline panel in 2010 also participated in the most recent discipline decision did not create an issue of bias, where the 2010 decision was based on an agreed statement of facts, without anyone calling any evidence.

And it is hard to imagine convicting someone of a bias crime without any evidence of bias.

I was not feeling comfortable buying an insurance plan which is a long term contract from him as he was biased about his insurance company without having any substantial evidence for his statements.

You spew forth your superficial argument mantra without any kind of back - up evidence to support your own personally biased way of leeching from the newly bleeding MLS / realtor.