Sentences with phrase «evidence you have seen from»

You seem agitated, which is understandable given the lack of evidence you have seen from your side.

Not exact matches

Wired has a good roundup of the possibilities; some observers fear the company has no intention of reselling e-books, that it merely wants to block others from doing so, but intellectual property experts see no evidence of that.
The Innocence Project is now seeking to get untested physical evidence from Hae's murder case tested to see if there's a match to any other suspect.
I wasn't around in the tech scene in the early 2000s, but from what I've seen we just don't have enough evidence to make that call.
You can see evidence of these scars in many clients» allocation of their financial assets; before we even begin to discuss asset allocation from an investment standpoint, we focus on making sure clients have sufficient liquidity to make it through another crisis.
From what I have witnessed, the Foundation with Buterin at its helm, has exercised a great deal of rational thought in its decision making process, and I have not seen any evidence that it has chosen self - interest over the betterment of the Ethereum community as a whole.
Given some evidence — uncertain and shaky to be sure — that the job market has cooled a bit while inflation is non-threatening, from what I see from here, the Fed should revert to data - driven mode and punt on a June hike.
We've seen a lot of evidence about what's coming, through the HomePod firmware leak, and reports including one from Bloomberg this week that outlines exactly how the iPhone interface will work without a home button, but Apple should still have plenty to reveal that we haven't seen at this event, including at least a few amazing ARKit demos.
The conditions in any two investing environments are never the same, but we do have historical evidence on what has happened in the past when interest rates rose from similar levels as those seen today.
I want to see some technical evidence that buyers have become aggressive and that is still missing from the recipe.
But, judging from recent messaging, Fed policymakers have yet to see compelling evidence of an acceleration in overall activity, viewing growth as set to remain at around trend rates, and are reluctant to factor in any significant impact from the Trump administration's future policies.
Third, we continue to believe recycled commodity prices will increase from April levels and have already begun to see clear evidence of this in the last couple of weeks.
Research findings from the Center for Talent Innovation, a New York - based think tank headed by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, found that having something inherently in common with the funder, decision maker or investor makes an enormous difference, since 56 percent of decision makers in the study did not value ideas they didn't personally see a need for, even when evidence suggests that it's a good, marketable idea.
After all, plant - based meat is already commercially available and we have not yet seen evidence that it has taken market shares from conventional meat.
«There has been quite clearly unethical action from the evidence that I have seen... fraudulent and perhaps even criminal action,» Christensen said.
Scott Hannah, president of the Vancouver - based Credit Counselling Society, which helps consumers who are drowning in debt, says he's seen little evidence households have learned anything from the financial crisis.
No there is a mountain of evidence for evolution: geographic distribution, tree of life, simpler organisms are older, inheritance, DNA, etc. and no evidence for creationism — unless you've seen a woman created from the rib of a man.
I haven't seen evidence of it, or intellectual honesty, from you as of now.
no apparent evidence of ill - will, and 3)... an experience of unity.Now, David, I haven't known you for very long (blogwise), but I respect what I have read from yr deep and thoughtful spirit, so with that in mind, I just don't see how this personal experience is translatable or cd be used as some kind of template when faced with the real Wal - Mart world.Do we not, like Jesus, show out true colours under pressure.Maybe I'm missing something... please correct me If I am and remember, I'm not into boob jobs (cleavage enhancement)
I see little evidence you want to debate, but just belittle people who have a worldview that differs from yours.
An unbiased view would presume the numbers of homosexual men at that time to be quite small — most likely the 2 to 2.5 percent that is now reported — and as far as I can see from the evidence, these few homosexual men did little or nothing to influence the bachelor subculture at the turn of the century.
It was indeed, as we can see from the many readers who fail to take note of this evidence, a perilous decision for him to have made.
Since we have evidence where our idea of rights comes from, and we can not see any such «god», to think this deity of yours is responsible for anything, is delusional.
As we have seen, the story about the women at the tomb, on the showing of the authors themselves, circumstantial as it is, remains inconclusive as evidence apart from further verification.
When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.
I think scientist see evidence from Micro greatest example the Darwin's birds beaks and claim it as macro which would be that birds could eventually create a new species.
See, evolution has heaps of evidence that all life here today evolved from less complex species.
But this immediately raises the question of the relationship between these two uses, necessary uses, as I see it, of the word «I.» It certainly does not seem to me that I have any empirical evidence whatsoever for holding that the «I» writing these words now, at this precise 1 / 10th of a second, is in any sense a different «I» from the «I» which started writing this paper some time ago.
And while I am far from perfect in this area, it is one way I see the evidence of how God has changed me (which is what we call being «born again.»)
«But, at the same time, we have also seen evidence of some of the worst aspects of human nature, in that there are people - men, women and children - in this country who are going hungry, and yes, there are some people who attempt to abuse any system that is put in place, be that from the state or voluntary bodies.
From the evidence I have seen locals in their cultures are better suited to the task and the calling.
Yes there is, I have seen the evidence, from both sides, and tons of religions and promise you, Christianity is the only one where the more you look into it, the more it makes sense
Here's the majors, so plan accordingly for your place in this life or the next: 1) there is not a single fossil to evidence mankind's evolution from some so - called earlier form (see missing link) however we do however have mountains of DNA evidence showing we have common ancestors with primates — so you either believe in a Creator, or Aliens, or actual evolution or a mix of any of the three.
I hope we will remember that, more often that not, what keeps a person from embracing the gospel is not that he hasn't seen enough evidence to support the existence of God in science or in logic, but that he hasn't seen enough evidence to support the existence of God among the people who claim to be following Him.
«There is no way you can deny evidence of history when you have seen the actual hair, the shoes,» he said referring to exhibits at Auschwitz that display hills of hair and shoes from the tens of thousands of Jews gassed there.
Also I would love to see all these Atheists «forcing their religion on the rest of us» You know like creating laws to limit your rights, creating groups to silence and limit the freedoms and expressions simply because they believe didn't from you, that thing we call evidence and proof, can you provide any?
However, I have yet to see a single missive from you that provides any evidence you possess a brain.
There is zero evidence that your psyche abuse works and from the people that I have seen and the reports by the APA it definitely does harm.
Robespierre's address to the Commune of Paris at the convention of 1793 evidences that his Supreme Being also had this same character: «L'homme pervers se croit sans cesse environné d'un témoin puissant et terrible anquel il ne peut échapper, qui le voit et le veille, tandis que les hommes sont livrés au sommeil...» (F. A. Aulard, Le Culte de la raison et le culte de l'Être Supreme (Paris, 1892), pp. 285 f.) How can one isolate this «structure» and separate it from its biblical antecedents, when — to cite only one of the many passages — one can read in the book of Isaiah (29:15): «Woe to those who hide deep from the Lord their counsel, whose deeds are in the dark, and who say, «Who sees us?
The Guardian: Turkey lifts ban on headscarves in schools Turkey has lifted a ban on female students wearing headscarves in schools providing religious education, in a move drawing criticism from secularists who see it as fresh evidence of the government pushing an Islamic agenda.
So maybe forehead had a point at some issues AW simply ruin some players» careers my evidence is Podolski, this guy can score goals he never misses three chances his left foot is a real killer but leProf cant use him the guy is not a winger (why not try OG12 as a winger and see what he can do), he cant find a way to get a lot from this guy he NEVER give him a lot of second chances either.
On evidence so far this team still needs at least 2 defenders, i think Mert will soon be feeling the affects of last season too, in this season and if we not getting a DM, Callum Chambers should be moved to that position allowing us to become more mobile (from what i have seen of him in defense i think he would even be more impressive in DM).
The FA Cup win from last May led us to speculate that we might see a resurgent Arsenal on show at the very beginning of this season but, on the evidences of their displays until now, Arsenal's detractors (one amongst them, Jamie Carragher) have every right to feel vindicated once again.
The reverse line movement on this one is strong, and we have seen supporting evidence from our system plays to back these trends up.
Wenger put ozil on the wing for his development one thing i do nt get is how the fans do nt see that Wenger done the same process with Wilshere, I remember when Monreal was caught out at the back post from a set piece and ozil did nt cover he just jogged abit n let monreal get beat, that would be video evidence for Ozil to learn and work on his duty to defend instead of giving him Candy like a baby n letting him be lazy in the middle not tracking back for the team its a learning process im 100 % Wenger knows ozils best position is in the centre he followed him since Shalke its obvious but Wenger develops players into world class after seeing Ozil in the world cup and coming back after the world cup i coud see he defended alot more helping out monreal on the flanks and putting in alot more effort only then once hes showed his duty in defending will he be given his free role in the middle.
Most people in this thread from what I see have been measured in their response and advocate waiting for evidence before coming to any absolute conclusions
Sure, you can see evidence of their league - leading payroll all over the roster (keeping Kershaw like the Rays wouldn't have been able to, getting Adrian Gonzalez in the first place), but they don't have the shiny, premium free agent from this offseason that the Giants and Diamondbacks nabbed.
Im 100 % with you — from what I have seen — the actions of the Browns — the evidence would point to not only Sashi making the ill fated decisions on the QBs — but also implications that Hue may have had contrary opinions that were not in anyway final.
Another thing I've noticed is that whenever Wenger actually comes under real pressure from the fans, the players actually start performing, which also can be seen as evidence they don't feel the pressure to win most of the time.
We've already seen evidence that Scott Linehan is a petulant child who can't take criticism or any kind of input from his staff or players.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z