The Bournes, of course, as is amply
evidenced by the behaviours of the three main parties since the end of WWII, couldn't give a damn what the British people want or deserve.
Not exact matches
• Although social modeling theory would suggest otherwise, there seems to be no
evidence that children are more likely to imitate aggressive
behaviour by the same - sex parent: for example, boys model mothers» aggression just as often as fathers» aggression (Davies et al, 2002).
However there is
evidence that at least some children with hyperactive
behaviour are made worse
by one or more of a wide range of food.
An editorial in The Lancet suggested the ACMD did not have sufficient
evidence to judge the harms caused
by this drug class and warned: «Making the drug illegal will also deter crucial research on this drug and other drug - related
behaviour, and it will be far more difficult for people with problems to get help.»
In 2008 the courts ruled that using force for these purposes breaches children's human rights because it can cause serious harm and was not shown to be necessary (the court referred to
evidence that in secure children's Homes restraint is not used to enforce good
behaviour by children convicted of an offence).
This was a reference to the report
by Alistair Webster QC on behalf of the Lib Dems, who said that: «In my opinion, the
evidence of
behaviour which violated the personal space and autonomy of the complainants was broadly credible.»
There was also is
evidence that the norms of adversarial majoritarianism associated with Westminster politics imbued the
behaviour of those within the Coalition, illustrated
by the way that the Liberal Democrats withdrew support for boundary support in retaliation for the collapse of the House of Lords Reform Bill in 2012.
Of course we can point out the utter failure of state - based solutions as
evidenced by increasing brokenness in society and rising violent crime and anti-social
behaviour... Better to encourage marriage to build family, and the independent voluntary sector to play a role etc..
One controversial experiment recently challenged this either / or scenario of light
by apparently detecting
evidence of both wave - and particle - like
behaviour simultaneously.
And in Thailand, a similar database provided
by an American company is used to keep tabs on citizens and log
evidence of antigovernment
behaviour.
«Researchers have known for decades about carnivorous
behaviours by tool - making hominins dating back 2.5 million years, but now, for the first time, we have direct
evidence of exploitation
by our Stone Age ancestors of specific animals for subsistence,» says Nowell.
Some philosophers have found that our sense of free will is less threatened
by determinism than the commentators suppose — so even faced with incontrovertible
evidence that
behaviour is predetermined, we still see ourselves as free and responsible for our own actions.
By testing this and other predictions about the
behaviour of the theta aurora, our observations provide strong
evidence that the plasma trapping mechanism is responsible for the theta aurora,» he adds.
That view was echoed
by Theresa Marteau, director of the
Behaviour and Health Research Unit at the University of Cambridge Institute of Public Health, who submitted
evidence for the report.
Important advances have included the discovery of the first
evidence that the odour response is governed
by neurons, of the intracellular signalling pathways between odorant receptors and sensory neurons, and of specific neurons, receptors and neurotransmitters involved in
behaviour adaption following experience.
The delicate balance between the human microbiome and the development of psychopathologies is particularly interesting given the ease with which the microbiome can be altered
by external factors, such as diet, 23 exposure to antimicrobials24, 25 or disrupted sleep patterns.26 For example, a link between antibiotic exposure and altered brain function is well
evidenced by the psychiatric side - effects of antibiotics, which range from anxiety and panic to major depression, psychosis and delirium.1 A recent large population study reported that treatment with a single antibiotic course was associated with an increased risk for depression and anxiety, rising with multiple exposures.27 Bercik et al. 28 showed that oral administration of non-absorbable antimicrobials transiently altered the composition of the gut microbiota in adult mice and increased exploratory
behaviour and hippocampal expression of brain - derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), while intraperitoneal administration had no effect on
behaviour.
This report gives an account of
behaviour in schools based on national
evidence and provides an analysis of
behaviour in a range of educational settings based on visits
by Ofsted.
In response, the government noted the «worrying picture» in schools, including «some very disturbing
evidence about the sheer volume of sexually predatory and abusive
behaviour experienced
by young girls», but said existing legislation on the issue within the Government Equalities Office was «already strong» and would not be immediately changed.
Noting the «worrying picture» in schools, including «some very disturbing
evidence about the sheer volume of sexually predatory and abusive
behaviour experienced
by young girls», the government said existing legislation on the issue within the Government Equalities Office (GEO) was «already strong» and would not be immediately changed.
Rather than relying solely on qualifications and perceptions of personal qualities that are not substantiated
by evidence, emphasis is placed on actual
behaviours and actions demonstrating application of personal qualities and impact on teaching and learning.
An animal is in a good state of welfare if (as indicated
by scientific
evidence) it is healthy, comfortable, well nourished, safe, able to express innate
behaviour, and if it is not suffering from unpleasant states such as pain, fear, and distress.
There is
evidence that smaller dogs tend to be a bit more high - strung than larger dogs, but it may be people that create this difference in
behaviour: either
by raising small dogs differently, or
by misinterpreting their actions.
In both of these cases, the existence of these phenomena can be disrupted in models (and there is
evidence of similar
behaviour in the real world)
by small changes in freshwater and increasing polar amplification, respectively.
As you're a climate goober
evidenced by your amazing ENSO ignorance and penchant for only imbibing blog slops from where N - evil tells you where to sup — let me enlighten you — you may have noticed the northern hemisphere doesn't look like the southern hemisphere (or maybe given your
behaviour you haven't).
I agree, I do not see any
evidence of bad
behaviour or ill will
by O'Donnell et al..
A new video short produced
by Republic Report's Lee Fang shows just how off - side Republican candidates are in this midterm election cycle when it comes to the overwhelming scientific
evidence that human
behaviour is to blame for the current climate and atmospheric disruption we are experiencing.
If you have specific information concerning unethical
behaviour and lying (e.g. such as that
evidenced in the released emails)
by Steve or other CA participants then bring it forward... or get off the pot.
«The paper
by Skinner provides important
evidence the Southern Ocean is at least a substantial source of the CO2 increase (
by showing a 50 % decrease of 14C in the atmospheric CO2), which is a critical piece of the puzzle when trying to understand, model, and quantify the CO2 source / sink
behaviour of the Southern Ocean in a warming world today and in the future.
But the history of research on the atmospheric circulation seems to conflict with recent theory — which I assume is driven mainly
by Jennifer Francis and colleagues, and which is what US science advisor Holdren is referring to when he says there is a growing body of
evidence linking meandering jet stream
behaviour to Arctic temperature amplification.
The Supreme Court of Canada will hear five appeals this week, including three criminal cases involving driving «over 80» and production of
evidence; an unjust enrichment claim; and an appeal in a sexual assault case in which the Court of Appeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred
by relying on a stereotype about the
behaviour of sexual assault victims.
At cl 4 (5) the Lord Chancellor is to have regard to the actual investments made
by investors of relevant damages, although there is no requirement for him to publish any
evidence he considers of such investor
behaviour.
This requirement can be satisfied either
by adducing direct
evidence or
by asking the court to draw an inference based on, notably, whether the link was user - activated or automatic; whether it was a deep or a shallow link; whether the page contained more than one hyperlink and, if so, where the impugned link was located in relation to others; the context in which the link was presented to users; the number of hits on the page containing the hyperlink; the number of hits on the page containing the linked information (both before and after the page containing the link was posted); whether access to the Web sites in question was general or restricted; whether changes were made to the linked information and, if so, how they correlate with the number of hits on the page containing that information; and
evidence concerning the
behaviour of Internet users.
In fact, some
evidence would suggest that business schools are sending the implicit message that unethical
behaviour is acceptable, at least as assessed
by the prevalence of student dishonesty.
These statements are seriously problematic because, as you also state, ethical
behaviour of the jury «requires the juror to impartially and fairly assess the
evidence respecting the law as set out
by the trial judge».
As well, he rejected the expert
evidence produced at trial
by California because it showed only a correlation and not a causal relationshihp between depiction of violence and subsequent violent
behaviour by children.
Detailed and thorough cross-examination of the complainant
by defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger focused on instances of past aggressive
behaviour by the complainant including previously biting the client and implausible and exaggerated aspects of her
evidence.
The government's avowed determination to eradicate myths about supposedly true victim
behaviour, in spite of there being no UK research
evidence of a negative impact
by such myths on the conviction rate, makes a stark contrast with their apparent insouciance about the potentially negative impact on the conviction rate as a cumulative result of potential jurors reading lurid media accounts of the exposure of false rape claims.
[133] Yet experience has shown that prosecutors will occasionally put forward as
evidence of guilt, post-offence conduct that is essentially equivocal — such as the accused's strange
behaviour when first spoken to
by the police or the fact he failed to render assistance to the victim.
An assessment based on «information» is not restricted to «
evidence», and the information to be taken into account when making the assessment is not limited to the offender's previous convictions or a pattern of
behaviour established
by them, or information about the offender which is limited to them.
It is useful to quote key observations
by Stadlen J [at paras 126 - 129]: «In my view, notwithstanding the absence in the FTPP proceedings of some of the statutory and non-statutory safeguards which apply to criminal proceedings... [I] n deciding whether it would be fair to admit the hearsay
evidence, the requirements both of Article 6 and of the common law obliged the FTPP to take into account the absence of all those [safeguards]... [I] n my judgment, no reasonable panel in the position of the FTPP could have reasonably concluded that there were factors outweighing the powerful factors pointing against the admission of the hearsay
evidence... The means
by which the claimant can challenge the hearsay
evidence are... not in my judgment capable of outweighing those factors... The reality would appear to be that the factor which the FTPP considered decisive in favour of admitting the hearsay
evidence was the serious nature of the allegations against the claimant coupled with the public interest in investigating such allegations and the FTPP's duty to protect the public interest in protecting patients, maintaining public confidence in the profession and declaring and upholding proper standards of
behaviour... However, that factor on its own does not in my view diminish the weight which must be attached to the procedural safeguards to which a person accused of such allegations is entitled both at common law and under Article 6... The more serious the allegation, the greater the importance of ensuring that the accused doctor is afforded fair and proper procedural safeguards.
It goes further
by allowing, subject to judicial discretion,
evidence of disposition which falls short of a conviction or acquittal but represents a type of
behaviour, referred to as «other reprehensible
behaviour» within CJA 2003.
At the ancillary relief proceedings
evidence was given
by the wife, her daughters and the husband's relatives of instances of the husband's
behaviour towards them and its effects on them and their families.
The House of Lords has clearly recognised that hearsay
evidence has a crucial role to play in the presentation of a public authority's case to deal with problems caused to local communities, whether
by way of anti-social
behaviour in its many forms committed
by individuals — many of whom are young and disaffected — or
by the general nuisance which often attaches to premises where drugs are being used unlawfully.
The routine use of hearsay
evidence in applications for anti-social
behaviour orders (ASBOs) has been addressed
by the Divisional Court in R (on the application of Cleary) v Highbury Corner Magistrates» Court [2006] EWHC 1869 (Admin), [2007] 1 All ER 270.
Hearsay
evidence offers a rare respite to communities seriously affected
by anti-social
behaviour.
«Why 82 % of clients choose more expensive firms» written
by Paul Hugh - Jones, my partner, explains a crucial piece of empirical
evidence about the buying
behaviour of clients of larger law firms.
Expert
evidence is particularly prevalent where inferences must be drawn from a wide variety of human behaviour: see, for example, R. v. McIntosh (1997), 35 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), at pp. 101 - 103, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused R. v. McCarthy, [1998] 1 S.C.R. xii [leave sought by second appellant in McIntosh, Mr. McCarthy]; David M. Paciocco, «Coping With Expert Evidence About Human Behaviour» (1999) 25 Queen's L.J. 305, at pp. 307 - 308; S. Casey Hill et al. at para. 12:30.10; R. v. Olscamp (1994), 95 C.C.C. (3d) 4
evidence is particularly prevalent where inferences must be drawn from a wide variety of human
behaviour: see, for example, R. v. McIntosh (1997), 35 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), at pp. 101 - 103, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused R. v. McCarthy, [1998] 1 S.C.R. xii [leave sought by second appellant in McIntosh, Mr. McCarthy]; David M. Paciocco, «Coping With Expert Evidence About Human Behaviour» (1999) 25 Queen's L.J. 305, at pp. 307 - 308; S. Casey Hill et al. at para. 12:30.10; R. v. Olscamp (1994), 95 C.C.C. (3d)
behaviour: see, for example, R. v. McIntosh (1997), 35 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), at pp. 101 - 103, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused R. v. McCarthy, [1998] 1 S.C.R. xii [leave sought
by second appellant in McIntosh, Mr. McCarthy]; David M. Paciocco, «Coping With Expert
Evidence About Human Behaviour» (1999) 25 Queen's L.J. 305, at pp. 307 - 308; S. Casey Hill et al. at para. 12:30.10; R. v. Olscamp (1994), 95 C.C.C. (3d) 4
Evidence About Human
Behaviour» (1999) 25 Queen's L.J. 305, at pp. 307 - 308; S. Casey Hill et al. at para. 12:30.10; R. v. Olscamp (1994), 95 C.C.C. (3d)
Behaviour» (1999) 25 Queen's L.J. 305, at pp. 307 - 308; S. Casey Hill et al. at para. 12:30.10; R. v. Olscamp (1994), 95 C.C.C. (3d) 466 (Ont.
Adaptability is the capacity to change old
behaviours in light of new
evidence as well as dealing with adverse conditions
by choosing the right course of action.
This study provides
evidence that a diversity of family background (socioeconomic deprivation, housing tenure, family disruption and parental interest), health and development (cognition and
behaviour) measures gives powerful independent childhood indications for general health and mental well - being in early adulthood, whereas limiting long - standing illness in adulthood is most strongly indicated
by health difficulties in childhood.
This case study demonstrates preliminary
evidence which suggests sensory based intervention such as SAS may be effective for managing sensory - based challenging
behaviours demonstrated
by children with ASD in a classroom setting.