The existence of god and
evil is completely relevant without a «creator» based simply upon the general benefit (good) or harm (evil) done to society.
The writer of this strange apocalyptic book regarded the millennium as an interlude before the final cosmic battle — an interlude in which peace and joy reign supreme and
all evil is completely, if temporarily, suppressed.
Niebuhr dismissed them by saying that «the «cultural lag» theory of human
evil is completely irrelevant to the analysis of... sin (NDM 250).»
Maybe it's the result of some or all «sins», but
evil is completely derived and carried out by humanity.
Not exact matches
The greatest discomfort for us
is that in speculative, overvalued, overbought, overbullish markets, we'll often look like idiots, lose credibility, and later recover a flood of followers who
were bloodied in a
completely predictable collapse that makes us look like
evil geniuses.
but like JW said, it sometimes
is the lesser of the
evils and to remove that choice
completely is unethical.
The manner in which a Christian must act
is completely devoid of selfish and
evil acts, with the most important rules involving showing love for all others.
There
are evils in this world, but their presence doesn't mean that God
is completely absent.
It
's silly) And since the belief and the book can
be used to justify
evil actions, then it
's really about how YOU interpret the belief, because others can interpret it in a
completely different way and act «immoral» by their exegesis.
That «The God of Christianity
is so weak that He could allow such an
evil thing to happen to His own Son»
is a concept or idea that he found
completely repulsive and a complete insult to the power of God.
It
is a good thing that racism
is completely eliminated in America because I would have said that it played an critical and
evil role in assisting the current condition of black people.
It
is quite clear that if Allah wanted to He would have created man wholly good and
completely ignorant of all
evil.
Justice itself
is not
completely served because
evil still exists although tormented.
Robert Jewett has long pointed out the American infatuation with superhero figures with mythic powers whose sole purpose
is to rid the world of
evil, though they never seem to succeed
completely.
To
completely correct or repair the damage done at the moment in time that the
evil deed
was done, would take a divine altering of history and the destruction of every human.
And the Good will eradicate the
evil completely; their co-existence
is never permanent.
«YAHWEH the Mighty One of peace,» this
is a key to the New Covenant; what you can not do YAHWEH will work in you, «Set you Apart from
evil completely, «this you can ask for and expect», and your entire spirit, inner
being and body
be kept blameless in the presence of our Master YAHSHUA the MESSIYAH.»
the golden rule came from Kong Fuzi an (Atheist) which which
was brought over from the Shinto golden rule (love others as you love your self) which you cant really love others until you love your self,... and the idea of tolerance and acceptance
is a Pagan ideal not a christian who
are completely intolerant of evething not in the bible or mention in the bible as
evil,..
If the
evil presence
were completely banished from this house, how would the dream
be different?
Thus
evil is in one way or another recognized as having reality, even if only that of a temporary accompaniment of unredeemed creation, but its reality
is never permanent, nor
is it ever
completely divorced from the good.
It
is sufficient, and in fact more enlivening, for us simply to trust that the back of
evil has
been broken, and not to imagine that the final victory has
been completely won.
Just as the Church never failed in its works of charity, so it
was never
completely blind to the social
evils and economic injustice of the day.
So, I
'm to believe that all the things that
completely debunk the world's largest control scheme
were fake and added by
evil men, but all the other stuff
is totally true?
Anyway, the middle east
was completely overrun by the Romans and the
evil philosophizing Greeks and the Jewish people
were super oppressed and confused and
were looking desperately for the Messiah to set them free from this tyranny and wondering what God
was up to.
But this means that God
is completely unmoved and untouched by any good or
evil which man may do and that man can make absolutely no difference to God.
As Christian documents so well, God's initial conformal feelings
are perfect, re-enacting the same feeling with all of the intimacy and poignancy that the creature felt, without any loss or distortion.16 Here God
is completely vulnerable,
completely open to all the
evil and the tragedy that the world has seen.
Not sure about
evil, but same alleged god, that so far
is purely imaginary and
completely unfounded.
What Jesus said to do has
been completely obscured by the
evil gibberish from Rove, Cheney, Norquist and the entire Pantheon of extremist idiots.
A person can disguise the hidden
evil in his intentions (perhaps even without
being completely aware of it himself) in his verbalizations and utterances, but he can not hide or disguise the spirit behind his utterances, and if it
is the Spirit of Christ speaking to the sinner, it can never
be disguised or hidden.
Their leaders
are either
completely clueless or just plain
evil, yet people continue to follow them by the millions.
Given the only understanding of omnipotence that makes any sense (the social view), the conclusion
is, rather, that not even an omnipotent
being could
completely determine the activities of other
beings and thus guarantee a world lacking
evil.
Mackie concludes: «From these it follows that a good omnipotent thing eliminates
evil completely, and then the propositions that a good omnipotent thing exists, and that
evil exists,
are incompatible.»
However, if we now agree that Premise X
is only metaphysically false (and not logically false), i.e., if we agree that it
is only metaphysically impossible (and not logically impossible) for one
being's activities to
be completely determined by another, given the analysis of «X
is omnipotent» with which we have
been working, there would
be no apparent reason for supposing that it
is not within the power of an omnipotent
being to
completely determine each of the activities of all other
beings and thus to bring about a world devoid of
evil.
I
completely agree, atheists aren't «
evil», most people I know
are just like me and just don't choose to believe theres a magical
being in the clouds that controls our lives.
There
is, of course, wide disagreement on these issues, some holding that war
is sometimes necessary for the restraint of
evil and the winning of time for positive steps toward peace, others holding that war itself erects such barriers to these steps that it
is completely futile as well as unchristian.
No
completely satisfying answer has yet
been given to the question why, if God
is a reality, powerful and benevolent,
evil is allowed to exist.
The old «Christianity
is evil because Christianity has killed millions» argument... If you read the Bible, there
are many times that God commanded His people to destroy other groups of people through, gasp, violent means, because those people had rejected Him
completely and
were ruining the earth, which He had made.
He says that even though all humanity
is completely evil from their youth, He will never again destroy every living thing as He has done in the flood.
The first
is to avoid it
completely as an instrument of
evil.
But I know almost nothing about Native religion or theology, having
been completely cut off from it by my own family since it
was seen as something
evil and dangerous.
The men who wrote the book took the liberty to create a something that
was completely false and
evil.
What makes his act so
evil is the fact he took it beyond a targeted political assassination to the wholesale slaughter of the
completely innocent.
I share Father Berrigan's repugnance toward those in high intellectual and religious places who apologize for or ignore gross historical
evil, and I have insisted that Auschwitz bears a commandment to Jews also not to destroy their fellow human
beings, that the necessity for Jewish survival, illuminated and commanded by the Holocaust, can not justify the principle that it
is better to do than to suffer injustice — that this goes
completely counter to the spirit and teaching of the Jewish religio - ethical tradition.
There
is evil in the world because there
is a
completely evil being that constantly causes suffering and pain.
To
completely have free will, I must
be able to make an
evil choice (to hate the person) as well as good choices (to love or respect the person).
And by the fact that God will infuse Himself
completely in them,
evil will not
be possible though all individuals will retain their agency.
Perhaps the defender of the doctrine, «God exists»
is possible, need only conceive a set of circumstances to require Deity, while the opponent of the doctrine need only conceive a set of circumstances incompatible with divine existence, e.g., a
completely evil universe.
The three of you
completely fill the profile of those who
are filled with
evil based on your continued hateful and mocking comments.
in the case of our club the powers that
be sees us as a necessary
evil... believe me if they could figure out a way to take our money without ever having to deal with us they would... instead they simply gauge our concerns then manufacture an aggressive PR campaign addressing said concerns so as to sell season tickets and the like... so whether it
's about Sanchez staying, transfer budgets, lengthy player injuries, club expectations etc... this team has treated us like a petulant teenager that should
be seen and not heard, which
is a
completely disrespectful way to treat incredibly loyal fans who pay some of the highest ticket prices in the world... this
is why this team doesn't get the benefit of the doubt, this
is why they don't get a pass when they screw up and this
is why they don't deserve our respect when it comes time to show them the door... that time
is NOW
They tended to give birth at home in a lying - in chamber which
was basically their own homes
completely closed off to create a warm environment and sometimes ward off
evil spirits.