Sentences with phrase «evil is not»

Resident Evil is not a game designed for the adventure purist in mind.

I am thrilled to report that OUIJA: ORIGIN OF EVIL is not a pile of shit!

What if the cause of all evil is not a matter of what, but who?

The gist here is that the figure of evil is not quite so interested simply in your demise, per se, which would be one thing, but rather in how well it can scare the living daylights out of you before, er, your demise.

Only someone like you would say that serving evil filth out of devotion to your god of horror and evil is not evil.

The Dean of Southwark Cathedral has said «Evil is not stronger than good», as the church opened its doors for the first time since the London Bridge terror attacks.

The distinction between justice and injustice, virtue and evil is not always sharp.

(3) Evil is not an inherent or necessary part of existence or human nature (creation was created good), but neither are humans wholly free to choose the good at any given moment.

(2) Evil is not an inherent or necessary part of existence or human nature, but rather a choice, freely exercised at any given moment.

From this perspective, the Problem of Evil is not merely an intellectual problem, but an intuitive one, a problem that might be solved on paper, but never within the deep heart of man.

I can think of many other adjectives, but evil is not one of them...

Instead of a richly ironic story in which even Jesus» enemies are caught up in the symphony of grace, we get a Manichean morality play, in which evil is not so much transformed by God's love as merely beaten by it.

The question, then, of apparent evil is not whether Whitehead's God builds upon every evil in the attempt to perfect the world and Godself.

What the social view of omnipotence is telling us is that a world devoid of evil is not a possible value of S in that last mentioned formula.

Fourth, occasional intervention with coercive efficient causation to counteract excess evil is not as equitable to all occasions in the world as the constant intervention in every occasion with final cause tending to overcome evil.

The proper definition of apparent evil, however, is prima facie evil which when judged from an ultimate frame of reference is that in the place of which no other realistically possible occurrence could be better.2 «Apparent» evil is not only a means to perfection, but also a morally necessary and justified means.

The case of the symbolism of evil is not an exception, one tributary of the gloomy experience of evil.

In both cases the evil results causally from my action, and in both cases the evil is not desired for its own sake.

«The doctrine of absolute non-resistance to evil is not enunciated here: the issue is one of individual conduct in specific circumstances» (Hill, p. 127).

While evil is not radical, if by that is intended «at the root of things» — for it can not be, if God is love and is Himself «at the root of things» through His creativity at work in them — it is most certainly not to be dismissed or minimized or talked away.

Evil is not within Him.

One reason for fascination with such forms of evil is not perverse but understandable: we'd prefer to believe that evil looks like that than to face the fact that it may look, and feel, almost harmless.

I would have to exist before I could be evil and that would (by definition) mean that anyone who thinks I'm evil is not an atheist.

Evil is not some intrisic property.

The way to combat evil is not to be unyielding or uncompromising, the way to combat evil is to study its motivation, the doer's history, understand their perspective and then, with compassion, offer them another alternative.

«Evil is not a problem to be solved,» as she would later say, «but a mystery to be endured.»

Evil is not in command of creation.

C. S. Lewis suggested that a modern version of the Fall in the Garden of An Eden (coming to «know good and evil») might be interpreted this way — coming to know that one's own view of good and evil is not the only one and may not be the correct one.

Ely expresses this negatively by saying that «evil is not really transcended in the world.»

Evil is not a positive reality, but a lack of some good quality that should be present, rather as blindness is not something positive, but the privation of the power of sight.

Evil is not the same thing as immorality.

The mystery of evil is not the mystery of suffering per se, but the mystery of destructive, apparently senseless suffering.

Chateaubriant, Oradour, the Rue des Saussaies, Tulle, Dachau, and Auschwitz have all demonstrated to us that Evil is not an appearance, that knowing its causes does not dispel it, that it is not opposed to Good as a confused idea is to a clear one, that it is not the effect of passions which might be cured, of a fear which might be overcome, of a passing aberration which might be excused, of an ignorance which might be enlightened, that it can in no way be turned, brought back, reduced, and incorporated into idealistic humanism....

Evil is not the result of a decision, for true decision is not partial but is made with the whole soul.

The Dean of Southwark Cathedral has said «Evil is not stronger than good», as the church opened its doors... More

Evil is not quantifiable.

«The belief in a supernatural source of evil is not necessary; men alone are quite capable of every wickedness.»

One would be to insist — as Plantinga does in his reply to the Basingers» article (PS 11:25 - 29)-- that they are concerned only with showing that admitting the existence of evil is not inconsistent with adherence to a «C» - omnipotent classical idea of God.

Evil is not out there; it is in our neighborhoods.

This does not mean that there is no real loss; and it may be that some evil is not as such «redeemable».

Today, we will see why the death that will come from eating of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is not a punishment from God, but is actually a blessing... and we will also see how the command to not eat from the tree is the final touch on the temple that God has built.

It seems to have been proved within out time that the problem of human evil is not much affected by better education, better housing, higher wages, and holidays with pay — desirable as all these things may be for other good reasons.

God's allowance of evil is not his morally intending it: God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.

Although I am very far from subscribing to the doctrine of the total depravity of man, it does seem to me to have been proved within my own lifetime that the problem of human evil is not much affected by better education, better housing, higher wages, holidays with pay, and the National Health Service — desirable as all these things may be for other good reasons.

But this evil is not the expression of the new testament.

It does imply, however, that unlike God the king, the God who suffers with the world can not wipe out evil; evil is not only part of the process but its power also depends on us, God's partners in the way of inclusive, radical love.

Evil is not something to be created... evil is like darkness... as darkness is absence of light..

Likewise, evil is not exclusive to catholics priest therefore my point that instead of complaining about catholicism and bashing «catholics», we should all condemn pedophiles, regardless of who they are or their roles in their communitiies.

The question of the reality of evil is not normally where the debate is.

Just because a preach appears in your eyes as displaying the fruit of the spirit does not mean that evil is not their companion.