«So I think that by extending the market in this sense, we can still have the numbered titles keep their identity about what Resident
Evil is supposed to be, but still expand and hit other markets as well.»
Not exact matches
Deuteronomy 17:2 - 5
Suppose a man or woman among you, in one of your towns that the LORD your God
is giving you, has done
evil in the sight of the LORD your God and has violated the covenant by serving other gods or by worshiping the sun, the moon, or any of the forces of heaven, which I have strictly forbidden.
It
is written; «If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which
is according to godliness; he
is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings,
evil surmisings, perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth,
supposing that gain
is godliness»
Sorry, it
is supposed to
be «To err
is human», to repeat it needs
evil inside us or sanction from religion or both.
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they
are supposed to
be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it
is said Abraham believed God and it
was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you
are on about that men use to justify their
evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance
is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i
am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there
are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more
is discovered.I find it amazing that God
is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
That
was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently
been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear
's when I hallucinate it
's likes they
are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they
are trying to get me just as they
are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there
's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they
are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they
are saying the only way I can explain it
is emotions comfort joy love
is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't
evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I
'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look
evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I»
am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it
's time for change I've lost my faith I've
been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I
am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it
's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to
be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I
'm not
supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I
'm up for the challenge like I said I
'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I
'm going to hang around for a wee while there
's lots of good information to
be plundered loll
''... the right of holding slaves
is clearly established in the Holy Scriptures, both by precept and example... Had the holding of slaves
been a moral
evil, it can not
be supposed that the inspired Apostles... would have tolerated it for a moment in the Christian Church.
Lem me see here, according to your holy book your God personally ordered more infant killings than all American abortion doctors combined, ordered the annihilation of half a dozen civilizations, routinely taunted and tortured humanity, introduced
evil into the world then blamed the things he created for it (even though he
's supposed to
be omniscient and omnipotent), then abandoned humanity for at least a couple thousand years while making plans to come back and slaughter 2/3 of Earth
's inhabitants so that he can judge them and throw most of them into a torturous hell for all of eternity... for not
being able to overcome the nature your book says he gave them... Just so he can have non-free will - having cloud gnomes sing his praises for eternity.
Logic
is evil, we
are just
supposed to accept what a bunch of ignorant men wrote down two thousand years ago, makes perfect sence.
It makes you feel imprisoned no matter whether your jailer
is supposed to
be benevolent or
evil.
Suppose that you
are only too aware of
evil in yourself which vitiates relationships and dries up the springs of compassion.
A unique pastoral task concerns the parishioner who inclines to do good openly while doing
evil secretly.45
Suppose you have a parishioner who has a wide public reputation for generosity, liberality, and mercy, yet secretly
is doing something despicable.
he or she would go into slavery, and it
was not an
evil thing as you
suppose, in fact as
was the custom he or she could remain in slavery by having his ear awled to the doorway.
I
suppose that
's where we'll have to part ways, tiggy: I believe that human
beings ARE bad,
evil even, by nature and inclination.
Little boys playing with a pig skin while their
supposed «coaches»
were the personification of
evil.
Futhermore, where experience
is mixed, as with our experience of the world's good and
evil, a priori reasoning can
be of considerable importance in supporting our confidence that some
supposed «felt concrete redemption
is no illusion but an authentic experience of what really
is (and perhaps even must
be) the case.
The NRA
is not as unmitigatedly
evil as the Mafia, but neither
is it as patriotic as it
supposes.
And now
suppose the best the atheologian can do by way of an antitheistic argument from
evil is to point out that theists do not have an explanation for
evil: then theism has nothing to fear from him.
If God
is good and powerful as the theist believes, then he will indeed have a good reason for permitting
evil; but why
suppose the theist must
be in a position to figure out what it
is?
1Ti 6:3 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, [even] the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which
is according to godliness; 1Ti 6:4 He
is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings,
evil surmisings, 1Ti 6:5 Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth,
supposing that gain
is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.
I
suppose people who owned slaves felt pretty discriminated against as the social tide change and America progressed and realized the
evil that
was slavery.
As we have already pointed out, the system of power culture must eventually fall because of its inner contradictions, and in this we can take comfort, but our sense of comfort
is premature if we
suppose the failure of one
evil system means the reinstitution of that which sensitive men have most prized.
He hoped to show that America
was not as virtuous in her foreign policy as she
supposed, nor the Soviet Union as
evil as Americans
supposed she
was.
I
suppose you
are referring to the devil... again teh beast
is a symbol of
evil and he
is also described as many other symbolic things throughout the Bible and they show his
evil nature and how he decieves mankind into defying God as Eve did with the apple and as you
are still doing right now.
Hers
were sins of commission — she committed the
evil she
was not
supposed to.
We
are not to
suppose that Jesus
was counseling his disciples to
be indifferent to such
evil or acquiescent in it; his entire ministry looks in the opposite direction.
I
suppose my question
is given there
is the existence of good an
evil — what can we do about it so that we end up doing more good than harm?
(2)
Suppose, to avoid these
evils, we conceive God's first temporal decision to
be perfect and complete.
I
suppose i agree that man can not
be trusted with his own moral freedom, since it has
been shown that certain individuals tend to perform «
evils» while claiming to
be righteous.
What, do you
suppose,
was the
evil that the Founders had in mind when they adopted the First Amendment's Religion Clause with its «free exercise» and «no establishment» provisions?
If the thing exists it
's some kind of
evil spirit; certainly not worthy of worship, which means Jesus, for all his
supposed good qualities,
was wrong about THAT too.
Churchfolk contradict Deuteronomy 30 and the whole message of the Bible when they
suppose that an imminent cataclysm
is inevitable, and that efforts to address collective
evils are a waste of time.
However, if we now agree that Premise X
is only metaphysically false (and not logically false), i.e., if we agree that it
is only metaphysically impossible (and not logically impossible) for one
being's activities to
be completely determined by another, given the analysis of «X
is omnipotent» with which we have
been working, there would
be no apparent reason for
supposing that it
is not within the power of an omnipotent
being to completely determine each of the activities of all other
beings and thus to bring about a world devoid of
evil.
The standard polemics against capitalism, imperialism, racism, militarism, and whatever
are now marginally recast in terms of the
supposed threat such
evils pose to Our Planet» or, as it
is now said, «The Earth Community.»
Since all agree that a world devoid of
evil is consistently describable, it
is thus
supposed that it
is within the power of an omnipotent
being to bring about a world devoid of
evil.
Out of loyalty to both the gods and to the memory of the murdered father, the mother must
be destroyed, the mother who represents security, warmth, religion, authority, but who has become corrupt and an
evil bearer of all that she
is supposed to represent.
On the one side, Christians
were to exercise undiscourageable goodwill toward
evil men, even praying for those who slew them when no other manner of expressing goodwill remained; but, on the other side, the new faith retained the hopeless torture chamber of Gehenna, where punishment
was supposed to go on in endless agony long after moral purpose in the torture had
been lost.
They know abortions
are only 3 % of planned parenthoods activity but they need their base to believe it
's all
evil because it
's provides a safe environment for a women to get advice and aid apart from their religious conservative male heads of the household who
are supposed to make all the decisions!!
The question
is whether the mixture of good and
evil in the world as such can provide the basis for
supposing its maker to
be absolutely good.
The bottom line
is that any decent religion
is supposed to
be about understanding people's issues and trying to make them better people, without resorting to bullying, threats, excommunication, etc. for those times when it doesn't hold, because people
are human, not
evil.
If you really want to, I
suppose you can fry them up, but just know that I'll
be giving you the
evil nutrition eye.
The man we
are meant to boo has done almost nothing
evil, while the people we
are supposed to cheer for have
been consistently petty and behaving like hatin» - ass haters.
The bottom - line
is the move from the Highbury
was based on lies, it
's clear to see that what
was supposed to
be a necessary
evil to compete at the highest levels,
was in fact an elaborate ruse concocted by the filthy rich as a means to increase their wealth at our expense.
That
supposed evil begins the very second you assert there
are some people who
are English and some who
are either not or less so not whether or not they live here.
I
suppose the argument will
be made that without the
evil Cahill gumming up the works (in exchange for Safety Net and election expense relief of the towns), the county would have pulled in at least another $ 3.8 million.
It will
be just like the credit card bill of rights or whatever they called that joke that
was the last act that
was supposed to save us from the
evil bankers / hedge funders / insurance companies.
My understanding could
be way off (it must
be, I
suppose, for me to view it as
evil).
The connection between
evil and money has
been a principal bane of democracy, turning democracy, that same vehicle that
is supposed to bring good tidings into a vehicle of mixed blessings — the good and the ugly.
These officials
are suppose to
be the «people» protectors from «
EVIL» doers and not part of the «
EVIL DOING SYSTEM»
But I
suppose those who
are determined, no matter what, to vote Labour will burnish the myth of Ed as the hapless innocent who
is continually duped by the
evil, Progress - packed PLP.