Sentences with phrase «evil is supposed»

«So I think that by extending the market in this sense, we can still have the numbered titles keep their identity about what Resident Evil is supposed to be, but still expand and hit other markets as well.»

Not exact matches

Deuteronomy 17:2 - 5 Suppose a man or woman among you, in one of your towns that the LORD your God is giving you, has done evil in the sight of the LORD your God and has violated the covenant by serving other gods or by worshiping the sun, the moon, or any of the forces of heaven, which I have strictly forbidden.
It is written; «If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; he is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness»
Sorry, it is supposed to be «To err is human», to repeat it needs evil inside us or sanction from religion or both.
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll
''... the right of holding slaves is clearly established in the Holy Scriptures, both by precept and example... Had the holding of slaves been a moral evil, it can not be supposed that the inspired Apostles... would have tolerated it for a moment in the Christian Church.
Lem me see here, according to your holy book your God personally ordered more infant killings than all American abortion doctors combined, ordered the annihilation of half a dozen civilizations, routinely taunted and tortured humanity, introduced evil into the world then blamed the things he created for it (even though he's supposed to be omniscient and omnipotent), then abandoned humanity for at least a couple thousand years while making plans to come back and slaughter 2/3 of Earth's inhabitants so that he can judge them and throw most of them into a torturous hell for all of eternity... for not being able to overcome the nature your book says he gave them... Just so he can have non-free will - having cloud gnomes sing his praises for eternity.
Logic is evil, we are just supposed to accept what a bunch of ignorant men wrote down two thousand years ago, makes perfect sence.
It makes you feel imprisoned no matter whether your jailer is supposed to be benevolent or evil.
Suppose that you are only too aware of evil in yourself which vitiates relationships and dries up the springs of compassion.
A unique pastoral task concerns the parishioner who inclines to do good openly while doing evil secretly.45 Suppose you have a parishioner who has a wide public reputation for generosity, liberality, and mercy, yet secretly is doing something despicable.
he or she would go into slavery, and it was not an evil thing as you suppose, in fact as was the custom he or she could remain in slavery by having his ear awled to the doorway.
I suppose that's where we'll have to part ways, tiggy: I believe that human beings ARE bad, evil even, by nature and inclination.
Little boys playing with a pig skin while their supposed «coaches» were the personification of evil.
Futhermore, where experience is mixed, as with our experience of the world's good and evil, a priori reasoning can be of considerable importance in supporting our confidence that some supposed «felt concrete redemption is no illusion but an authentic experience of what really is (and perhaps even must be) the case.
The NRA is not as unmitigatedly evil as the Mafia, but neither is it as patriotic as it supposes.
And now suppose the best the atheologian can do by way of an antitheistic argument from evil is to point out that theists do not have an explanation for evil: then theism has nothing to fear from him.
If God is good and powerful as the theist believes, then he will indeed have a good reason for permitting evil; but why suppose the theist must be in a position to figure out what it is?
1Ti 6:3 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, [even] the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; 1Ti 6:4 He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, 1Ti 6:5 Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.
I suppose people who owned slaves felt pretty discriminated against as the social tide change and America progressed and realized the evil that was slavery.
As we have already pointed out, the system of power culture must eventually fall because of its inner contradictions, and in this we can take comfort, but our sense of comfort is premature if we suppose the failure of one evil system means the reinstitution of that which sensitive men have most prized.
He hoped to show that America was not as virtuous in her foreign policy as she supposed, nor the Soviet Union as evil as Americans supposed she was.
I suppose you are referring to the devil... again teh beast is a symbol of evil and he is also described as many other symbolic things throughout the Bible and they show his evil nature and how he decieves mankind into defying God as Eve did with the apple and as you are still doing right now.
Hers were sins of commission — she committed the evil she was not supposed to.
We are not to suppose that Jesus was counseling his disciples to be indifferent to such evil or acquiescent in it; his entire ministry looks in the opposite direction.
I suppose my question is given there is the existence of good an evil — what can we do about it so that we end up doing more good than harm?
(2) Suppose, to avoid these evils, we conceive God's first temporal decision to be perfect and complete.
I suppose i agree that man can not be trusted with his own moral freedom, since it has been shown that certain individuals tend to perform «evils» while claiming to be righteous.
What, do you suppose, was the evil that the Founders had in mind when they adopted the First Amendment's Religion Clause with its «free exercise» and «no establishment» provisions?
If the thing exists it's some kind of evil spirit; certainly not worthy of worship, which means Jesus, for all his supposed good qualities, was wrong about THAT too.
Churchfolk contradict Deuteronomy 30 and the whole message of the Bible when they suppose that an imminent cataclysm is inevitable, and that efforts to address collective evils are a waste of time.
However, if we now agree that Premise X is only metaphysically false (and not logically false), i.e., if we agree that it is only metaphysically impossible (and not logically impossible) for one being's activities to be completely determined by another, given the analysis of «X is omnipotent» with which we have been working, there would be no apparent reason for supposing that it is not within the power of an omnipotent being to completely determine each of the activities of all other beings and thus to bring about a world devoid of evil.
The standard polemics against capitalism, imperialism, racism, militarism, and whatever are now marginally recast in terms of the supposed threat such evils pose to Our Planet» or, as it is now said, «The Earth Community.»
Since all agree that a world devoid of evil is consistently describable, it is thus supposed that it is within the power of an omnipotent being to bring about a world devoid of evil.
Out of loyalty to both the gods and to the memory of the murdered father, the mother must be destroyed, the mother who represents security, warmth, religion, authority, but who has become corrupt and an evil bearer of all that she is supposed to represent.
On the one side, Christians were to exercise undiscourageable goodwill toward evil men, even praying for those who slew them when no other manner of expressing goodwill remained; but, on the other side, the new faith retained the hopeless torture chamber of Gehenna, where punishment was supposed to go on in endless agony long after moral purpose in the torture had been lost.
They know abortions are only 3 % of planned parenthoods activity but they need their base to believe it's all evil because it's provides a safe environment for a women to get advice and aid apart from their religious conservative male heads of the household who are supposed to make all the decisions!!
The question is whether the mixture of good and evil in the world as such can provide the basis for supposing its maker to be absolutely good.
The bottom line is that any decent religion is supposed to be about understanding people's issues and trying to make them better people, without resorting to bullying, threats, excommunication, etc. for those times when it doesn't hold, because people are human, not evil.
If you really want to, I suppose you can fry them up, but just know that I'll be giving you the evil nutrition eye.
The man we are meant to boo has done almost nothing evil, while the people we are supposed to cheer for have been consistently petty and behaving like hatin» - ass haters.
The bottom - line is the move from the Highbury was based on lies, it's clear to see that what was supposed to be a necessary evil to compete at the highest levels, was in fact an elaborate ruse concocted by the filthy rich as a means to increase their wealth at our expense.
That supposed evil begins the very second you assert there are some people who are English and some who are either not or less so not whether or not they live here.
I suppose the argument will be made that without the evil Cahill gumming up the works (in exchange for Safety Net and election expense relief of the towns), the county would have pulled in at least another $ 3.8 million.
It will be just like the credit card bill of rights or whatever they called that joke that was the last act that was supposed to save us from the evil bankers / hedge funders / insurance companies.
My understanding could be way off (it must be, I suppose, for me to view it as evil).
The connection between evil and money has been a principal bane of democracy, turning democracy, that same vehicle that is supposed to bring good tidings into a vehicle of mixed blessings — the good and the ugly.
These officials are suppose to be the «people» protectors from «EVIL» doers and not part of the «EVIL DOING SYSTEM»
But I suppose those who are determined, no matter what, to vote Labour will burnish the myth of Ed as the hapless innocent who is continually duped by the evil, Progress - packed PLP.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z