Sentences with phrase «evil people without»
Stalin, Mao, and, Pol Pot were evil people without a doubt, but a non-belief in a di.ety doesn't drive someone to ki.ll people.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
«The whole point about behavioural analysis,» explained Peter St. John, a retired professor of international relations with expertise in aviation security, «is that people can't intend evil like bombing planes and so on without showing some of it in their behaviour.»
Religion is a very bad mental disease, without religion there would be fewer starving people in the world, we would have settled Mars by now, and the abusive GOP and it's greedy banker uber - rich masters would be disempowered, as it is their veil of religion that disguises their evil, immoral and unethical nature.
@Raptor: With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things.
Some evils may be derivative from earlier evils (e.g. evil choices by people) rather than necessarily always directly imputed from without by Satan, but for classical Christian cosmology, especially in the Roman Catholic system of inherited guilt, the one (Satan's rebellion and successful tempting of Adam and Eve) causes the other (the Fall and subsequent evils).
@ 3rdMLNM: With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things.
hen discussing the possible existence of objective (divine) «truths», people like truthfollower / Theo appeal to their audience with various examples attempting to get the reader to agree to a non-qualifed value of «evil / incorrect / bad / good», as if this will lock in an agreement of an objective «truth» value (without it being explicitly specified).
The problem is that the Christians have labeled all non-christians as wicked and evil and they want to be free to live without non-christians around them, so in essence, they want the freedom to stomp and grind other peoples freedoms into the ground.
People are evil, and in need of a savior, and no atheist can make an exclusive claim otherwise without claiming to have a basis for their «objective» truth.
«With or without religion, good people will do good things and evil people will do evil things; but for good people to do evil — that takes religion».
The purpose of evil was to survive it and they determined (without ever knowing they had made up their minds to do it) to survive floods, white people, tuberculosis, famine and ignorance.
workingcopy12 Not all evil, but even without religion good people would continue to do good things.
«Without religion, we'd have good people doing good things, and evil people doing evil things.
«With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil — that takes religion.»
I'm speaking from personal expirence from my encounter with evil and none believers of GOD... Last there is a list which you can draw from to know if a person is possessed but the only way you could know that is to go through it yourself without turning your back on God and keeping God 1st at all times even in the darkest of times....
God called his people to be a light without trying to run the world... «Evil» will always exist and it will get worse.
People are becoming more and more evil, warped in their hearts and minds, and so unlike human beings, yet more resembling beasts, without a conscience....
People can be fragile without being evil.
Think of it, no judgement for the millions of people who live their lives without perpetrating major evils, yet would be sure to be found wanting by the God (s) of most religions.
These people can say what they want, treat others in the most despicable, cruel and out right evil ways, and their supporters, (friends and other leaders) will justify the wrong doing without any regard to the word of God.
There are far more people who go through life without doing anything evil than there are people who do do commit evil.
Even if the human person is most himself and freest when least encumbered with social, traditional, religious or familial ties, society is a necessary evil which protects as much as possible the freedom of the individual without being much of a threat to it.
We have to deal with the people on the sidewalks with their bible's and pamphlets telling us how horrible we are, how without god every human is inherently evil.
If a person wanted others to be unhappy at any point in time (without a reason of a greater good) that person was, and ever will be, evil.
Editors condemned the evil of liquor without much recognition of the social circumstances that might drive some people to drink.
Without religion, the world would be full of good people doing good things, and evil people doing evil things.
The rights of people can not be ensured and fostered today without a struggle against the evil aspects of capitalistic globalization.
To paraphrase one of my favorite quotes from Steven Weinberg: «With or without religion, good people will do good things and evil people will do evil things; but for good people to do evil — that takes religion». . .
Without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things.
I've known Jesus for as long as I've known my name, and still I use other people like capital to advance my own interest, still I gossip to make myself feel important, still I curse my brothers and sisters in one breath and sing praise songs in the next, still I sit in church with arms folded and cynicism coursing through my bloodstream, still I talk a big game about caring for the poor without doing much to change my own habits, still I indulge in food I'm not hungry for and jewelry I don't need, still I obsess over what people say about me on the internet, still I forget my own privilege, still I talk more than I listen and complain more than I thank, still I commit acts of evil, still I make a great commenter on Christianity and a lousy practitioner of it.
A person can disguise the hidden evil in his intentions (perhaps even without being completely aware of it himself) in his verbalizations and utterances, but he can not hide or disguise the spirit behind his utterances, and if it is the Spirit of Christ speaking to the sinner, it can never be disguised or hidden.
As Griffin himself finally acknowledges, Plantinga does maintain that without some plausible explanation «for the evil we find,» a person may face a «spiritual crisis» (PS 11:28).
As to why this happened, G - D said that the people of the earth in that time were evil, so much so that they continually had evil thoughts and performed evil actions without any righteous thoughts or actions, whatsoever.
With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things.
We had been praying for an impossible thing: that God would make evil disappear by magic, without the conversion of evil people.
Without constantly being told we are going to heII or that we must be evil people who are incapable of kindness and love without a deity enforcing our good behavior we would likely just have more time in our day to enjoy being kind and loving to others as we tend to be with no top down morality being forced uWithout constantly being told we are going to heII or that we must be evil people who are incapable of kindness and love without a deity enforcing our good behavior we would likely just have more time in our day to enjoy being kind and loving to others as we tend to be with no top down morality being forced uwithout a deity enforcing our good behavior we would likely just have more time in our day to enjoy being kind and loving to others as we tend to be with no top down morality being forced upon us.
How wrong is it to believe that people are not born evil miscreants looking to do harm to all without god in their life?
Oh yes and the believers just allow the non-believers to live their life without running smears like teaching that non-believers are evil people who can do no good, and attempting to force their doctrines into our laws.
Maybe the point is that even when all the people you know say that you are crazy and / or evil... When life gives you blow after blow without a chance to catch your breath... God still loves you and wants to bring good into your life.
I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
Even this test would be somewhat unfair to process theism because of religious conditioning by traditional theism, which makes it difficult for many people to take seriously the idea of a God without omnipotence in the traditional sense (see Griffin, God 258 - 59; Griffin, Evil 209 - 13).
Furthermore, without the deterrent that the death penalty provides, many people are emboldened to do evil they would not otherwise do.
The bottom line is that any decent religion is supposed to be about understanding people's issues and trying to make them better people, without resorting to bullying, threats, excommunication, etc. for those times when it doesn't hold, because people are human, not evil.
Hack opinion writers without conscience are the ultimate evil because they draw their ink from the blood of innocent people whose reputation they are paid to attack.
«There will be more and more people who will have to rely on the cognitive system entirely, without using their emotional memory, in order to decide what's good and what's evil.»
In her landmark book, she documented a litany of evils observed after DDT and other organochlorine insecticides were sprayed on landscapes, rivers, and lawns: dead birds and paralyzed birds, pigeons dropping from the sky, bird nests without eggs and eggs that did not hatch, dead fish and fish swimming in circles, cancers in humans, and a buildup of DDT in the fat of animals and people.
People who publish leaked documents without winding up endorsing a president who is evil and stupid.
Assuming the date goes without a hitch, then there is the complication that comes with actually latching on to that special person, because the life of the superhero's significant other will be in constant jeopardy should the evil villains discover that the superhero has an Achilles» heel — a helpless person that they care about.
To take other examples: people can relish murder mysteries without the reality of killing; they can watch suffering in a tragedy and still savor the presentation; they can observe evil characters in a film plotting horrible deeds and be hooked; a medieval painting of the tortures in Hell can draw tourists in droves.
To address my political header, if you are dumb enough to call people evil without being brave enough to have an open discussion with them first, then you are as dumb as burnt toast.