Sentences with phrase «evil sides of»

I consider that men DID create and write the bible, but both Christ and satan are metaphors... christ is the metaphor for the potential good in a person, satan the metaphor for the potential of bad or evil... given that this is MY definition, and makes much more sense that most other beleifs, then the bible WAS written by satan, or rather it was inspired by the bad / evil side of the minds of the writers.

While Vader was referring to the evil side of a mystical «Force,» this quote is equally applicable to many microscopy experiments with fluorescent proteins (FPs) localized to compartments other than the cytoplasm.

On the evil side of things, Chris D'Amico (Christopher Mintz - Plasse), the son of a mob boss who Kick - Ass killed with rocket launcher, has decided to get revenge by dressing up in a bondage outfit and dubbing himself a vulgarism that expresses maternal incest.

Mario got his mirrored - nemesis in the form of Wario, so they decided they needed to come up with someone to be the evil side of the coin for Luigi.

««The Economist» Examines Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Law Firms Main The Evil Side of Social Media: Flash Mob Thefts»

Not exact matches

Why did Charlie Munger recently say: «The current US health care system runs out of control on the cost side and leads to behavior that's not just regrettable, but evil.»

«The existing system runs out of control on the cost side and it causes a lot of behavior, which is not only regrettable, it's evil,» Munger, 94, said at the Daily Journal's (DJCO) annual meeting.

In comparison to Whitehat, this is the «evil side» of the playing field.

Satan never wrote his own bible explaining his side of the story, yet christians call him evil.

The film is also clear that JPII did not see the Cold War in terms of Evil Empire A v. Evil Empire B; instead, he sided with the Americans over the Soviets.

Evil grows and bears fruit, which is understandable, because it has logic and probability on its side and also, of course, strength.

Evil persecutes God and his followers... but can not harm any of God's children or God who is existence - only when evil perverts them individuals or confused them individuals by deceit can then harm mankind when the individual departs from the side of the lord our Heavenly God... San Peter denied Jesus one's or twice but never God himself... not oncEvil persecutes God and his followers... but can not harm any of God's children or God who is existence - only when evil perverts them individuals or confused them individuals by deceit can then harm mankind when the individual departs from the side of the lord our Heavenly God... San Peter denied Jesus one's or twice but never God himself... not oncevil perverts them individuals or confused them individuals by deceit can then harm mankind when the individual departs from the side of the lord our Heavenly God... San Peter denied Jesus one's or twice but never God himself... not once...

NOt all who call themselves prophets are true believers... some are just for the gains... those are persecuted... cause their evil gets them... those who don't separate themselves from God's side and wisdom can not be harm by evil... evil bows to them and allows them to pass by him unharmed... Cause evil can not harm God... it's the law of Nature... only evil can be harmed by evil...

15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.

In Harris» narrative, it's hard to see exactly how she comes to the conclusion that concerns for «the poor's rights» demand aligning with liberal politics rather than those of Christian conservatives, but by the end, Harris finds herself on the opposite side of the political spectrum, voting with those she had envisioned as the manifestation of evil while growing up.

Judging before knowing more how it should be right in Islam, or to know who is out of the righteous way of Islam or is being of Evil Deeds taking Islam as undercover... there are those are the worse Danger to any Religion or Islam within it, more than any others from out side... As they are the worse danger than any Combined forces put together... They are to their «Nation» as «Termites to Woods»..!!

He showed that communism and Nazism were but two sides of the same evil coin.

But the other side of this is that God is also involved, profoundly, palpably, personally involved, in suffering, in the suffering caused by evil.

And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

For now it's just a wish of mine & again to vote for the lesser of the evils on both sides.

On the level of reality, the good is impotent; all power is on the side of evil.»

In this way, we can accept Jesus, as we accept the «good» side of ourselves, and thereby save ourselves from «evil».

I find, on the contrary, that it is much more difficult today for the knowing person to approach God from history, from the spiritual side of the world, and from morals; for there we encounter the suffering and evil in the world, which it is difficult to bring into harmony with an all «merciful and almighty God.

A terrible duty had to be done and a terrible price had to be paid, and, in doing that duty and paying that price, good and evil were to be found on both sides of the conflict.

No one who knows anything of the darker side of human life will deny that acceptance in itself can pass easily into a sentimental condonation of evil which obscures the truth of human existence.

On the other side of the ledger, such traditional female «goods» as childbearing or housekeeping can be evil if their circumstances induce pain, separation, or helplessness.

I know very well that there are dark sides to every city — I experienced the dark side to Cambridge when I as running a hostel there, but that doesn't deny the fact that the majority of people in a city are not evil.

Clearly my bias is showing, and there's obviously a lot more nuance to both partiest, the main issue though is that parties can be hijacked and have been on both sides which leaves the large majority of moderates voting for the lesser of two evils and hoping that the candidate that they vote for will drop the pandering they did to the fringe and go moderate.

So we're at the place where we can say a couple - four things from the existential side of the problem of evil: [1] from the perspective that pain exists, and we perceive it, we as human beings (you could say «people») have an urge to do something about it when we see it.

@HeavenSent — «Evil folks are on the wrong side of the divide when they die.

The answer is simple: do the opposite of what catholics want because you can always expect to find them on the wrong side of any question regarding ethics and morals, especially if science is involved or it shows them to be evil.

and the history of your corrupt and evil church shows that those who believe in god are no more moral than anyone else for having» god» on their side.

The crucial religious experiences of man do not take place in a sphere in which creative energy operates without contradiction, but in a sphere in which evil and good, despair and hope, the power of destruction and the power of rebirth, dwell side by side.

Although shadings from the two extremes exist and are recognized, neither side recognizes the independent reality of the position between — the dialectical attitude toward evil which sees it as both real and redeemable.

There is an «already»: Christ has already come; God is on humanity's side; death has been vanquished once, and therefore once for all; evil has been vanquished once, and therefore once for all, and we can live in the certainty of love and hope.

The first step of finding the middle ground is to accept that both sides exist and are not evil incarnate.

Ogden, for example, tells us that «God is not neutral or indifferent to creaturely conflict but always sides with what makes for the good of his creatures as against all that makes for evil» (FF 94).

To summarize, to literalize the apocalyptic passages in the New Testament, is to run counter to all we know of astronomy and the world of space; they are tied in with the then - current Jewish eschatology and Persian dualism which saw evil in command of creation; as commonly accepted, they encourage passivity about the evils of the present world; they emphasize only one side of the message of Jesus to the exclusion of essential elements; they are grounded at least in part on a misconstruction of biblical poetry and drama.

The Cold War was a period of moral clarity when the other side really was an evil empire, and when armed resolve for once succeeded in defeating the expansion of evil in the world.

Nickles also states the other side of the dilemma of the problem of evil, «If God is good, he is not God.»

On the other hand Evil, in all its forms — injustice, inequality, suffering, death itself — ceases theoretically to be outrageous from the moment when, Evolution becoming a Genesis, the immense travail of the world displays itself as the inevitable reverse side — or better, the condition — or better still, the price — of an immense triumph.

Usually it is all the afflictions and difficulties of the finite which like evil spirits separate the lovers, but love has heaven on its side, and therefore this holy alliance overcomes all enemies.

I mean come on... you only see one side of it... a loving God takies the children out of the evil society as part of the plan and gives them eternal life... a society that molested them and threw thenm in the fire, etc....

@Doug Since I consider myself to be a warrior fighting for truth, honesty, and the good of humanity, you appear to be on the wrong or «evil» side of this war, because most religions avoid truthfulness and honesty and logic and reason like the plague.

The other side of this Slate - inspired hypothetical brings to light the characteristic evils of heterosexuality.

Only when it is too late, when much blood has been spilled, is it discovered that there was virtue on both sides, along with a considerable admixture of evil.

We should be clear, however, that the police, like many of us, often think like men of the apocalypse, assuming they are on the side of the angels against the forces of evil.

If one side prevails, the evil continues by virtue of having been established through the means used.

On the one side, Christians were to exercise undiscourageable goodwill toward evil men, even praying for those who slew them when no other manner of expressing goodwill remained; but, on the other side, the new faith retained the hopeless torture chamber of Gehenna, where punishment was supposed to go on in endless agony long after moral purpose in the torture had been lost.

In other words, running side by side we have the sea as something evil and something good, and the monster as a supernatural evil being, a symbol of anti-God forces, and a magnificent testimony to God's wisdom and power.