The belief in the redemption of
evil does not mean any security of salvation.
To most of those involved, the icon
of evil did not present itself whole.
If evil does not exist, then it is impossible to say that something is wrong.
I think one dangerous thought is the grand assumption in most of humanity that true
black evil doesn't exist.
The presence
of evil does not lead inevitably to a greater good.
«But you would have us believe that good and
evil didn't exist before the fall» On this we can agree, good and evil existed before the fall.
Whether if it does what the original
Resident Evil did by making an HD version of the game, or the «over the shoulder RE4 - inspired» gameplay is anyone's guess.
Only on the basis of God's terrible willingness to accept responsibility
for evil do we have grounds to trust God's promise to redeem evil.
Jesus is the consummation of all of creation, in Him there is no evil
as evil does not come from God and was Not created by Him.
However I do not enjoy «scientific» atheist myths like «believers are stupid, atheists r smart» the theory of evolution of viruses, Hitler was a Christian, God is evil and above all God does not exist
because evil does».
@Gaunt Good and
evil do matter, however, just being good doesn't get you into heaven.
«The God that I worship would never, ever want to
see evil done,» he said.
I only observe that the ballpark is a paradise into which
evil does occasionally come, whenever the Yankees are in town, and this occasionally lends the game a cosmic significance that it would not be improper to call «apocalyptic.»
Without going all biblical on you,
apparently evil doesn't work so well without good, and, gulp, vice versa, and most of the film unfolds around Megamind trying to resolve that issue.
I've made it a point to read what I could in depth about the Holocaust, and the
incredible evil done to so many innocents breaks my heart.
Given the above analysis,
nonmoral evils do not have to be seen as incompatible with the goodness of the classical God.
The major «temptation» that religious people fall into is illusion — and the
outright evils done in its name.
One's inner encounter
with evil does not presuppose that «self - analysis» of modern psychology which seeks to penetrate «behind» the experience, «to «reduce» it to the real elements assumed to have been «repressed.»»
Evil does wield a certain power when individuals allow themselves to become a receptacle through which it can operate.
That is, it seems to me that while the standard free - will explanation for
natural evil does allow the FWT to maintain logical consistency, it is not an explanation that flows in some obvious, natural sense from the basic tenets of free - will theism.
Whitehead's solution for the problem of
evil does acknowledge the reality of genuine evils, and I intend to pinpoint these evils.
In response to Hasker's fourth proposition, however, I argued against his contention that the notion of
gratuitous evil does not provide the needed criterion.
As William Rowe points out, when a fawn burns to death in a forest fire and no human being ever knows about it, this apparently
unnecessary evil does nothing to build the character of human beings.
The ball never got to Eduardo, Rosicky and Nasri together didn't quite look right, and because of
previous evils done upon our team Denilson, Vela and Theo were not quite ready.
These officials are suppose to be the «people» protectors from «EVIL» doers and not part of the «
EVIL DOING SYSTEM»
Tucker and Dale
vs Evil did the dark comedy horror genre better.
Contract evil does not necessarily arise out of bad intent or a genuine attempt to defraud.
In the first Austin Powers movie,
Dr. Evil didn't obtain a nuclear warhead and hold the world ransom for 70 % of his pre-retirement income.
As for the Sins player they follow more or less the same procedure, except they don't get any defensive symbols because
clearly evil doesn't believe in not getting itself killed stupidly.