Sentences with phrase «evolution because»

For example, biology professors are not allowed teach creationism or intelligent design as an alternative to evolution because only evolution conforms to what we know about reality.

I understand the resistance to evolution because people are so insecure, they would rather continue to be wrong than to admit that they have changed their mind.

The proponents of evolution because they are destroying our faith in God, the proponents of global warming because they are subversives destroying our fat, happy society.

Larsen says that the archaeological evidence is biased towards the later stages of dog evolution because dogs probably didn't start looking like dogs as we know them until relatively recently.

Living in the wine country has been the best evolution because I have had learned to focus on flavor in a different way.

Such broad functionality compounds studies of their reproductive evolution because the selective pressures driving their evolution may be due to critical somatic functions, and not a reproduction - related function.

«Microbes can play a role in evolution because we are showing that they affect behavior, and behavior is a primary target of selection,» Theis said.

New research suggests evolution is favoring the disorder: A study in PLOS Genetics says certain genetic mutations that are associated with an increased risk of autism were passed on during evolution because they are also associated with improved cognitive abilities.

«And shrimp are a great test case for evolution because you can find different species all over the world living at various depths and with a range of adaptation requirements.»

As long as they understand that there is pressure, environmental pressure, on organisms to adapt — antibiotic resistance by bacteria represent a form of evolution — but let's not call it evolution because that buzz word turns people off.

A lot of teachers are wary of teaching evolution because of the controversy, and I was in that group — I didn't know if I could cover it, what I could say or couldn't say.

A genetic variant that increases the risk of testicular cancer may be favored by evolution because it helps protect those with fair skin from the sun's damaging ultraviolet rays, according to a new study.

The ancient skull is butting up against theories of human evolution because of its incredible antiquity and unexpected human features.

Darwin only believed that you could study the effects of evolution because it was so slow.

One problem, the researchers say: breaking the «cycle of ignorance,» in which teaching students lack good role models for teaching evolution because they weren't taught the subject well in high school or college.

Astronomers rarely capture a star in this phase of its evolution because it occurs within the blink of an eye — in astronomical terms.

and many religious students appeared to reject evolution because of their faith even though they understand that the scientific community accepts evolutionary theory as valid.

Leah wrote: «I've had several uncomfortable conversations with pastors who have decried the evils of evolution because when I was teaching labs in graduate school I taught evolution.

In one sense, it is creationism because from our perspective it was designed and brought to fruition, but in another sense, it is evolution because it was produced by an evolved life form.

Reason is a beautiful evolution because it allows humans to survive and live through a deeper understanding of the universe focused on answering the question WHY?

I am yet to hear an evolutionary biologist claim that they accept Darwin's Theory of Evolution because:

Even major church denominations have embraced theistic evolution because they choose not to stay in darkness and lie to their flock about the threat of literal interpretation of the Bible.

I could go on all day with positive evidence indicating evolution because that's what science deals in, actual evidence.

Are you raising the validity of evolution because you can not name such a university?

There is no foundation to support evolution because no explanation is given for the origin of life

Some organisms have undergone relatively little evolution because they're already extremely well adapted to their environment, so they don't need to fine tune anything.

Pedro --» There is no foundation to support evolution because no explanation is given for the origin of life»

It's one thing to reject evolution because you don't think it's proven.

Scientists from all walks of life, around the world accept evolution because of the evidence and where it leads.

It does take faith in evolution because that is not a repeatable experiment in relation to human existence.

That proves no evolution because they couldn't get those animals unless the Lord asked them to.

You don't «believe» in evolution because of your stupidity, and I hope you're a christian, too, for the same reason.

Are you blindly assuming there is zero proof of evolution because it fits neatly in to your worldview?

However, you can not deny evolution because of that belief unless you deny the reality of the world around you.

Also the classroom should present what modern scientists teach on evolution because the theory has changed over the years.

It is completely made up by creationist because they can't argue against micro evolution because it is continually happening right in front of them.

@WASP Ok a good claim but who gave you that adrenalin gland to produce adrenalin it came from GOD and not evolution because evolution states that things can adapt to survive not that we came from monkeys

Ok we cant deny it anymore the church said, so lets say GOD created evolution but we will not calll it evolution because thats just is admitting that science was right, lets call it Smart design, and so creationism was born, its no surprise that any great discovery gets hijacked and twisted and changed to fit with the religious when so long before proven it gets denied by the same people.

Creationist have trouble separating the big bang from evolution because they believe that all creation occurred in one moment.

As a scientist, I'm always asking questions about the world we live in and I don't fault other scientists trying to prove evolution because that is the question they are passionate about.

(For example: «I don't believe in evolution because, unlike you, I believe in the authority of scripture.»)

Now I believe in evolution because I was brainwashed as a child and in college that it was fact.

Evolution and Creation Dear Fr Editor, Evangelical Creationists, I believe, can not accept the theory of evolution because it appears to conflict with Genesis 1.

Fox News has more credibility than a bible hugger who wants to attack evolution because it is bad for church attendence, but not much.

Of course no creationist will honestly research evolution because it describes a natualistic origin for mankind.

You may object to one or more particular consequences of evolution because they defy the antiquated fairytale you choose to believe in.

I brought up evolution because it's one of many pieces of evidence that makes it clear the earth is much older than thousands of years.

Do you reject evolution because christianity tells you so or do you have a valid theory that is different and can be backed up with evidence?

The rest of Nye's argument that believers in creation need to accept evolution because everyone else supposedly does is ludicrous.

DNA being uniquely different proves evolution because tens of thousands of mutations take place during conception.