Sentences with phrase «exactly point you are making»

They would call us and complain and said that those rates were negotiable — which was exactly the point we were making.

Not exact matches

Exactly how much taxpayers would save — or how much more they would pay — depends on many factors, and as Business Insider's Josh Barro pointed out, tax cuts for middle - class Americans aren't likely to be as sweeping as Republicans make it sound.

Read through the outline for the chapter in order to refresh your memory about exactly the point the chapter is making.

«The point of this bill in those states that get a waiver to do what they need to do to make it work better in their particular states has support exactly for that very person who, if, in the course between a year, get extra aid for support for pre-existing conditions,» Ryan explained, citing what he said were successful examples in Wisconsin and Maine.

The point the swimmer made was exactly that: Atheist certainly can enjoy that feeling as much as any religious type.

For your own sake, for their sake and exactly because of the point you made at the beginning of this statement: God is bigger.]-RSB-

That is exactly the point I make in the post.

For your own sake, for their sake and exactly because of the point you made at the beginning of this statement: God is bigger.

The points you make are all exactly right.

It goes into a lot of depth on exactly how to construct the boat... seems an odd point to make if the boat was never really supposed to be built.

last comment @ jun de, not ken, who made an excellent point, and whose irritation at my reasoning is exactly what I wanted someone to take part in.

Nonetheless, we can conclude that it really doesn't matter, the context doesn't make it clear exactly what it is to «baptize for the dead» but it does make it clear what point he was illustrating with it anyways:

You make my point exactly, when you say that it takes no faith to believe that all life is decendant from a single celled organism through random chance.

On the other hand, if you want to display the crossed beams because you feel the symbol makes a point and you want people to know that YOUR god was there, or that the attack was on YOUR religion... then that is exactly the reason * not * to display the crossed beams.

This reply here is just what you wanted, not exactly as you wanted it, but really, it's all there... blast away... and understand that it's right... and God is there... and you reject no matter what is told to you... at any point in time, past, present or future... so it makes no difference who said it, or when you're told.

But of course Tosh (with his particular humor) is making exactly the same point the author is.

Today, I hope to point out that Jesus is not exactly «raising the bar» on the law, or making the law more difficult so that we all see how sinful and evil we are and realize we need God's grace.

This is exactly the point that John Calvin made in treating the issue of political authority.

I return the charge: in that post aimed falsely at society, you were facetious, you did not engage with my points, you did not specify what exactly was wrong with my attitude, you psycho - analysed my words, you made broad sweeping generalisations.

And what point are you trying to make with Tiktaalik exactly?

@Jon exactly so — this is the point many people have been making.

I still say that it makes me laugh when first some Atheist will throw out the point that there are so many Christian denominations... but in an attempt to win sympathy the same Atheist will state that all of the denominations all think exactly the same.

I was just trying to take the idea to another level, but JW you make a good point that if they allow one group they should allow all groups and what exactly happens if a brother / sister relationship creates a child?

Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a point of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A) in a position of influence and B) spending money to fight the opposing view... and it's to stop two people who love each other from wedding in the eyes of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last point about slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who supported, or fought against slavery... many justified slavery because of their perverted interpretation of the bible... most people can't tell a simple story from one person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s of years... yup you must be right that God is against two people loving each other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?

St. Paul is making exactly the same point when he speaks of the «likeness of sinful flesh» (Rom.

Dear PATIAT, (In response) Exactly!!!! I can't give the author any points for «making an effort» to offer a carnal spin on something spiritual and i never said «It's not like that» God's word does that for her BUT she must read it with a spiritual mind and let go of her carnal one.

Anyway, I think that Christians should make a point of going to church, and of trying to find a church that is not EXACTLY like what they want it to be.

Cardinal O'Brien made exactly the same point, and it's worth considering why he argued that gay marriage would be «a grotesque subversion of a universal human right»; note exactly where the language of human rights comes from here:

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

My point is, I rarely make a dish exactly to the recipe due to lack of ingredients or some other random reason and this came out beautifully.

Yes that is exactly why we are doing this — the whole point is to be able to use the ratios to make them your own, and be able to tweak to whatever suits you.

At this point I make my own ketchup, mayo, and mustard, because I like to know exactly what I am eating, and I like to have control over the kinds of fats I consume.

And he may have made a (really) good point that I'm not exactly the best judge considering I am not the hugest fan of no - bake cheesecake or mint in desserts...

So what exactly is the point of qualifying, For the money I suppose.The only reason why qualification will make sense is if the team will be adequately strengthened in January but you and I both know that is never going to happen coz helloooooo, Wenger is still in charge

Forget everything else... if the game went over exactly as it did, but with the Spurs hitting their season average from 3 (35.2 %, which is about league average), we would have won last night's game by three points (10 made threes for 30 points, versus 4 made threes for 12 points).

What was it exactly that you saw that made you believe that a player with a.290 wOBA over 1,930 PA going into this season could turn in a wOBA that was 75 points higher?

There are about eight big plays or so that he made including his two sacks against the Ravens that I am going to point out to you so you can understand exactly why he is getting the Hoss Of The Week for Week 9, but in the interest of not boring the hell out of you with too many words (reading is hard), I will try to make the descriptions of those plays as brief as possible.

While I see your point I think it's been made pretty clear by everyone Wenger has complete control when it comes to footballing matters at arsenal and as Charlie Nicholas said a few seasons back it is arsene who decides to buy or walk away for example holding was told of arsenal's interest in him and it took three weeks for Wenger to agree to sign him for # 2million, that's not exactly a lot of money to arsenal is it.

After the West Ham game he put on a tweet stating something similar to «Made some mistakes and no points today, but looking to the next game», which is exactly the kind of mentality we need.

Ospina has been near flawless so far and that is exactly the point the boss was trying to make.

nobody, one cant always somebody and point the finger at someone... Thats exactly the roots of many problems, of course for some problems we can blame the people but not everything should have causal relation... there are too many factors included to make such a call, there are judgements of the opposite defenderes, the referee and last but not least PROBABILITY and CHANCE, they define the world ^ ^

And what makes it worse is that there's no way to tell exactly how much damage has occurred at any point, so unlike an ankle injury, say, there's no clearcut diagnosis, or prognosis.

During the game against Chelsea he proved that point exactly, by tracking back to help Bellerin on various occasions, as well as proving pretty well that he is capable of making a decent interception or two.

I thought I was the only one who felt Coquelin was the MOM.He made it look easy today.It's like he's coming back again.When he's like this he's just so good.If only he could carry the ball with authority he would be untouchable but of course that's life.Iwobi said he had a point to prove this season and he's doing exactly that with his hunger to impress.What a player we have on our hands.

If i recall exactly we had a whole argument over the valuation of Sterling, you refuted on numerous ocassions when i stated that Sterling would cost more than 35 million the point i made over 2 months ago and still make now and im sure most fans would agree is not that gnabry is better its just he is promising talent, and for the value City paid for Raheem (which is almost criminal considering Di Maria, cost PSG less) it would have been better to see Gnabry given a run out or sign someone actually worth 50 million

I think you point you make about how it never «went wrong» but instead went stale is exactly right — it's like that relationship that doesn't satisfy you but you are too dependant on it to break from.

The only Arsenal fan with a twisted mind is yourself and others like you, loyalty to a club is old news and past tense, exactly why Clichy and Nasri left for Citeh, it, s the weekly pay cheque that makes the difference, if Chelsea, Ci teh or Real Madrid offer van Persie a better weekly wage so be it as his manager Arsene Wenger has shown he can not take the club any further than a mediocre 3rd place and only one point ahead of Spuds, football in 2012 is big bu siness, get with the times or go away mister, your child ish unalytical mind won, t pay Robin, s monthly bils etc..?

Make it a point to tell the team what exactly it is you expect from them during training sessions.

Interestingly, I made it clear in the article that I was exactly jumping to conclusions and when I pointed that out he accused me of writing a misleading headline.

The issue with Pat is that he isn't exactly a superstar and while the MNF format rewards long - form analysis, he can sometimes take an age to make his point.