Also, it seems intellectually dishonest to advocate a carbon tax when the public is learning that the global warming advocates grossly
exaggerated the effect of carbon dioxide on the climate and satellite data show no global warming for the past eighteen years.
Science is advancing, and overwhelming the mass delusion, the folies a beaucoup, about
the exaggerated effect of carbon dioxide.
Not exact matches
All
of this makes it increasingly clear that the models greatly
exaggerate the warming
effect of carbon dioxide.
While the computer climate models
exaggerate the warming
effect of atmospheric
carbon dioxide, they plausibly simulate that greater economic development driven by growing use
of fossil fuels will add more
carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
To any unprejudiced person reading this account, the facts should be obvious: that the non-climatic
effects of carbon dioxide as a sustainer
of wildlife and crop plants are enormously beneficial, that the possibly harmful climatic
effects of carbon dioxide have been greatly
exaggerated, and that the benefits clearly outweigh the possible damage.
This position does not appear to be supported by any observational evidence, much like the highly
exaggerated claims concerning the
effects of human
carbon dioxide emissions on climate.