Last week, private school head teachers launched a scathing attack on
the exam marking system, accusing it of too often delivering «frankly unbelievable marks or grades».
Exams manager Paula Wood says confidence is at an all - time low in
the exam marking system, but will Ofqual's recent moderation announcements change that?
Not exact matches
The Chinese national educational
system has won high praise as an efficient
system with national standards, a narrow curriculum, a high - stakes test (the college entrance
exam), and a clearly defined set of gateways to
mark students» transitions from one stage to another.
Under the new
system, schools are charged # 10 for a clerical check to see if
marks were added up correctly and # 29.75 for a
marking review, but the charges only apply if there is no change to the
exam grade.
Mark Dawe, chief executive of OCR, said: «The shortage of examiners is a
system - wide problem which has affected all
exam boards in recent years.
NAHT are working with the
exam boards and other professional associations to improve and expand
marking capacity in the
system.»
Exam boards and the
marking system are checked and include moderation to ensure all papers are
marked to the same standard, but if you do not feel your grades are right, speak to your school about options for re-marks.
Shoddy
marking standards mean that hundreds of teenagers are wrongly missing out on places at their first - choice universities and eroding public confidence in Britain's
exam system, the leader of Britain's top independent schools will warn.
In response, a spokeswoman for the
exam regulator Ofqual said: «We are ourselves looking closely at the quality of
marking in the
exam system.
Mr Andrews later said he believed the
exam system was being «politicised» in England - and that
exam boards had been pressured to
mark more harshly.
And the HMC - representing 250 of some of the most famous independent schools - has launched its own broadside against the
exams system, in a report that says there are deep - rooted problems with unreliable, unfair and inaccurate
marking.
Under proposed reforms to the
system by which schools can challenge results, set out recently by the
exams regulator Ofqual,
exam boards will eventually have to accept requests from schools for access to
marked GCSE papers, as they already currently do for A levels, but it is not yet know when this will be implemented.
«These
exams are vital to the life chances of young people and the
marking system has to be improved.
This seems to be a definite move towards a clearer and more open
system, with the
exam boards held accountable for inaccurate
marking and having to explain any changes.
The regulator has also decided not to introduce a «red alert»
system to try and catch erroneous
marks before they are released to students, and says it has no power to ask
exam boards to lower the price of
marking appeals in deprived areas.
If there is any doubt about the
marking or results then our
exam system is in danger of falling into disrepute.»
Mr King, head teacher of Leicester Grammar School, says
marking remains a «cottage industry» that is unable to cope with the scale and stresses of the modern
exam system.