Other high scorers, particularly in East Asia, are assumed — rightly or wrongly — to apply great pressures on students and to «force feed» answers to
examination questions rather than to prepare students for broader modes of inquiry.
Not exact matches
The «overwhelming evidence for naturalistic evolution» no longer overwhelms when the naturalistic worldview is itself called into
question, and that worldview is as problematical as any other set of metaphysical assumptions when it is placed on the table for
examination rather than being taken for granted as «the way we think today.»
Of course, there's a place for an
examination of legal theory, justice and all kinds of other things; the
question is perhaps one of emphasis
rather than anything else.
Furthermore, even the legal tests applied for the assessment of PFD agreements were contiguous insofar as the Commission did not adopt a «quick look» approach in order to characterise the agreements in Lundbeck as restrictive «by object»;
rather, it did so following an individual and detailed
examination of the measures in
question having regard to their content, purpose and context.
Do not rush through your
examination questions;
rather, you should read them carefully before answering them.